OBJECTIVES: To generate a high-resolution atlas of the hippocampal subfields using images acquired from 7 T, multi-echo, gradient-echo MRI for the evaluation of epilepsy and neurodegenerative disorders as well as investigating R2* (apparent transverse relaxation rate) and quantitative volume magnetic susceptibility (QS) of the subfields. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Healthy control subjects (n=17) were scanned at 7 T using a multi-echo gradient-echo sequence and susceptibility-weighted magnitude images, R2* and QS maps were reconstructed. We defined a hippocampal subfield labeling protocol for the magnitude image produced from the average of all echoes and assessed reproducibility through volume and shape metrics. A group-wise diffeomorphic registration procedure was used to generate an average atlas of the subfields for the whole subject cohort. The quantitative MRI maps and subfield labels were then warped to the average atlas space and used to measure mean values of R2* and QS characterizing each subfield. PRINCIPAL OBSERVATIONS: We were able to reliably label hippocampal subfields on the multi-echo susceptibility images. The group-averaged atlas accurately aligns these structures to produce a high-resolution depiction of the subfields, allowing assessment of both quantitative susceptibility and R2* across subjects. Our analysis of variance demonstrates that there are more apparent differences between the subfields on these quantitative maps than the normalized magnitude images. CONCLUSION: We constructed a high-resolution atlas of the hippocampal subfields for use in voxel-based studies and demonstrated in vivo quantification of susceptibility and R2* in the subfields. This work is the first in vivo quantification of susceptibility values within the hippocampal subfields at 7 T.
OBJECTIVES: To generate a high-resolution atlas of the hippocampal subfields using images acquired from 7 T, multi-echo, gradient-echo MRI for the evaluation of epilepsy and neurodegenerative disorders as well as investigating R2* (apparent transverse relaxation rate) and quantitative volume magnetic susceptibility (QS) of the subfields. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Healthy control subjects (n=17) were scanned at 7 T using a multi-echo gradient-echo sequence and susceptibility-weighted magnitude images, R2* and QS maps were reconstructed. We defined a hippocampal subfield labeling protocol for the magnitude image produced from the average of all echoes and assessed reproducibility through volume and shape metrics. A group-wise diffeomorphic registration procedure was used to generate an average atlas of the subfields for the whole subject cohort. The quantitative MRI maps and subfield labels were then warped to the average atlas space and used to measure mean values of R2* and QS characterizing each subfield. PRINCIPAL OBSERVATIONS: We were able to reliably label hippocampal subfields on the multi-echo susceptibility images. The group-averaged atlas accurately aligns these structures to produce a high-resolution depiction of the subfields, allowing assessment of both quantitative susceptibility and R2* across subjects. Our analysis of variance demonstrates that there are more apparent differences between the subfields on these quantitative maps than the normalized magnitude images. CONCLUSION: We constructed a high-resolution atlas of the hippocampal subfields for use in voxel-based studies and demonstrated in vivo quantification of susceptibility and R2* in the subfields. This work is the first in vivo quantification of susceptibility values within the hippocampal subfields at 7 T.
Authors: Andreas Schäfer; Birte U Forstmann; Jane Neumann; Sam Wharton; Alexander Mietke; Richard Bowtell; Robert Turner Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: K Yamada; S Naruse; K Nakajima; S Furuya; H Morishita; O Kizu; T Maeda; K Takeo; K Shimizu Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1997 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Maged Goubran; Boris C Bernhardt; Diego Cantor-Rivera; Jonathan C Lau; Charlotte Blinston; Robert R Hammond; Sandrine de Ribaupierre; Jorge G Burneo; Seyed M Mirsattari; David A Steven; Andrew G Parrent; Andrea Bernasconi; Neda Bernasconi; Terry M Peters; Ali R Khan Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Jannis Hanspach; Michael G Dwyer; Niels P Bergsland; Xiang Feng; Jesper Hagemeier; Nicola Bertolino; Paul Polak; Jürgen R Reichenbach; Robert Zivadinov; Ferdinand Schweser Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Linda Marrakchi-Kacem; Alexandre Vignaud; Julien Sein; Johanne Germain; Thomas R Henry; Cyril Poupon; Lucie Hertz-Pannier; Stéphane Lehéricy; Olivier Colliot; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Marie Chupin Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-05-02 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Juri-Alexander Witt; Roland Coras; Johannes Schramm; Albert J Becker; Christian E Elger; Ingmar Blümcke; Christoph Helmstaedter Journal: J Neurol Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Birgit R Plantinga; Yasin Temel; Alard Roebroeck; Kâmil Uludağ; Dimo Ivanov; Mark L Kuijf; Bart M Ter Haar Romenij Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Jessie Kulaga-Yoskovitz; Boris C Bernhardt; Seok-Jun Hong; Tommaso Mansi; Kevin E Liang; Andre J W van der Kouwe; Jonathan Smallwood; Andrea Bernasconi; Neda Bernasconi Journal: Sci Data Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 6.444