| Literature DB >> 21387376 |
Olivier Piguet1, Asa Petersén, Bonnie Yin Ka Lam, Sanaz Gabery, Karen Murphy, John R Hodges, Glenda M Halliday.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a progressive neurodegenerative brain disorder, clinically characterized by changes in cognition, personality, and behavior. Marked disturbances in eating behavior, such as overeating and preference for sweet foods, are also commonly reported. The hypothalamus plays a critical role in feeding regulation, yet the relation between pathology in this region and eating behavior in FTD is unknown. This study aimed to address this issue using 2 complementary approaches.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21387376 PMCID: PMC3084499 DOI: 10.1002/ana.22244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Neurol ISSN: 0364-5134 Impact factor: 10.422
FIGURE 1Diagrammatic representation of the appetite-stimulating (green) and appetite-suppressing (red) pathways between the periphery and the hypothalamus, and of their connections within hypothalamic nuclei. PVN = paraventricular nucleus; LHA = lateral hypothalamic area; DMN = dorsomedial nucleus; DHA = dorsal hypothalamic area; VMN = ventromedial nucleus; NPY = neuropeptide Y; CART = cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript; ARC = arcuate nucleus.
Clinical Characteristics of the Neuroimaging and Postmortem Cohorts (mean ± standard deviation)
FIGURE 2Volumetric changes in the hypothalamus of patients with behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) compared to healthy controls. Volumes are standardized to a percentage of the mean hypothalamic volume of the healthy control group (the gray band reflecting the standard deviation). (A) In vivo anterior and posterior hypothalamic volumes in bvFTD corrected for head size. Significant atrophy in the posterior hypothalamus atrophy is observed in bvFTD at presentation. (B) In vivo hypothalamic volumes in bvFTD patients exhibiting high or low feeding disturbance corrected for head size. Greater atrophy of the posterior hypothalamus (white bar, right) is present in bvFTD patients with high feeding disturbances at presentation compared to bvFTD patients with low feeding disturbance and compared with healthy controls. (C) Postmortem absolute anterior and posterior hypothalamic volumes in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Significant posterior hypothalamic atrophy in FTLD is observed. (D) Postmortem absolute hypothalamic volumes in FTLD patients exhibiting different inclusion pathologies. More severe posterior hypothalamic atrophy is observed in the FTLD-TDP group (white bar, right) compared with the FTLD-tau group, and compared with healthy controls. MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; TDP-43 = TAR-DNA–binding protein 43. *Posterior hypothalamus in this group is significantly smaller than that of healthy controls; ** posterior hypothalamus in this group is significantly smaller than those of the other two groups.
FIGURE 3Comparisons of the posterior hypothalamic regions (the dorsomedial [DM] and lateral hypothalamus [LH] nuclei) involved in appetite stimulation between controls and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) cases with tau or TAR-DNA–binding protein (TDP) pathology reveals neuronal loss in FTLD-TDP compared to both controls and FTLD-tau (row 1) in Nissl-stained sections (0.5% aqueous cresyl violet [CV] and 0.1% Luxol fast blue [LFB]). Insets illustrate tau (column 2) and TDP-43 (column 3) immunopositive inclusion pathology observed in these regions. Immunoperoxidase staining with cocaine- and amphetamine-regulating transcript (CART, rows 2 and 4) and orexin (rows 3 and 5) reveal no evident differences in the density or morphology of neurons containing these neuropeptides across groups in either the DM (rows 2 and 3) or the LH (rows 4 and 5).
Hypothalamic Volumes and Neuronal and Glial Counts in FTLD-TDP, FTLD-Tau, and Healthy Controls (mean ± standard deviation)
FIGURE 4Comparison of the arcuate nucleus (Arc) between controls and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) cases with tau or TAR-DNA–binding protein (TDP) pathology. Nissl staining (0.5% aqueous cresyl violet [CV] and 0.1% Luxol fast blue) reveals no noticeable differences in neuron density in Arc (row 1). Immunoperoxidase staining for cocaine- and amphetamine-regulating transcript (CART, row 2) within appetite-suppressing neurons and neuropeptide Y (NPY, row 3) within appetite-stimulating neurons show no noticeable degeneration of these neurons across groups. Similarly, there were no apparent differences in the staining for vasopressin and CART in the periventricular nucleus (PVN) between the groups.