Literature DB >> 11707101

"Voxel-based morphometry" should not be used with imperfectly registered images.

F L Bookstein1.   

Abstract

John Ashburner and Karl Friston (2000) introduced a standardized method of "voxel-based morphometry" (VBM) for comparisons of local concentrations of gray matter between two groups of subjects. Segmented images of gray matter from grossly normalized high-resolution images are smoothed and their group differences analyzed by the now-conventional voxelwise Worsley approach to Gaussian random fields of differences. This comment concerns an unfortunate interaction between the algorithm's spatial normalization and voxelwise comparison steps, whereby several obvious quantitative confounds are injected at the core of the inference engine the authors put forward. Specifically, the statistics of the resulting voxelwise comparisons are uninformative about group differences wherever the spatial normalization algorithm has failed to register on any robustly appearing image gradient. The method of Ashburner and Friston is defensible only far from all image gradients. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11707101     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  203 in total

1.  Default network correlations analyzed on native surfaces.

Authors:  Tyler M Seibert; James B Brewer
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Asymmetry of the brain surface from deformation field analysis.

Authors:  Jack L Lancaster; Peter V Kochunov; Paul M Thompson; Arthur W Toga; Peter T Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  [Mrt-based morphometry. A current assessment].

Authors:  M Tittgemeyer; D Y von Cramon
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  Structural abnormalities in the dyslexic brain: a meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies.

Authors:  Fabio Richlan; Martin Kronbichler; Heinz Wimmer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Feature-based morphometry.

Authors:  Matthew Toews; William M Wells; D Louis Collins; Tal Arbel
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2009

Review 6.  Computational analysis of cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Hidemasa Takao; Osamu Abe; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 7.  Shifting from region of interest (ROI) to voxel-based analysis in human brain mapping.

Authors:  Loukas G Astrakas; Maria I Argyropoulou
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-05-13

8.  Structural consequences of diffuse traumatic brain injury: a large deformation tensor-based morphometry study.

Authors:  Junghoon Kim; Brian Avants; Sunil Patel; John Whyte; Branch H Coslett; John Pluta; John A Detre; James C Gee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Impact of interacting functional variants in COMT on regional gray matter volume in human brain.

Authors:  Robyn Honea; Beth A Verchinski; Lukas Pezawas; Bhaskar S Kolachana; Joseph H Callicott; Venkata S Mattay; Daniel R Weinberger; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Second-language learning and changes in the brain.

Authors:  Lee Osterhout; Andrew Poliakov; Kayo Inoue; Judith McLaughlin; Geoffrey Valentine; Ilona Pitkanen; Cheryl Frenck-Mestre; Julia Hirschensohn
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.