Literature DB >> 10896690

Which neuropsychiatric and behavioural features distinguish frontal and temporal variants of frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease?

S Bozeat1, C A Gregory, M A Ralph, J R Hodges.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of changes in mood, personality, and behaviour in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) and hence, which features reliably distinguish between them. To establish whether the frontal and temporal variants of FTD are characterised by different behavioural changes.
METHODS: A questionnaire was designed to assess a wide range of neuropsychiatric changes; it incorporated features reported in previous studies of FTD and components of the neuropsychiatric inventory.(1) This was completed by 37 carers of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 33 patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), comprising 20 with temporal variant FTD (tv FTD) or semantic dementia and 13 with frontal variant FTD (fv FTD). An exploratory principal components factor analysis and discriminant function analysis was applied.
RESULTS: Factor analysis showed four robust and meaningful symptom clusters: factor 1-stereotypic and eating behaviour; factor 2-executive dysfunction and self care; factor 3-mood changes; factor 4-loss of social awareness. Only stereotypic and altered eating behaviour and loss of social awareness reliably differentiated AD from FTD with no effect of disease severity. By contrast, executive dysfunction, poor self care, and restlessness showed a significant effect of disease severity only, with the more impaired patients scoring more highly. Changes in mood were found to be equally prevalent in the three patient groups. Analysis of individual symptoms showed increased rates of mental rigidity and depression in the patients with semantic dementia compared with those with fv FTD. Conversely, the latter group showed greater disinhibition. Discriminant function analysis correctly classified 71.4% overall and 86.5% of the patients with AD.
CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire disclosed striking differences between patients with FTD and AD, but only stereotypic behaviour, changes in eating preference, disinhibition, and features of poor social awareness reliably separated the groups. The patients with fv FTD and semantic dementia were behaviourally very similar, reflecting the involvement of a common network, the ventral frontal lobe, temporal pole, and amygdala. Dysexecutive symptoms and poor self care were found to be affected by the severity of the disease, reflecting perhaps spread to dorsolateral prefrontal areas relatively late in the course of both FTD and AD. This questionnaire may be of value in the diagnosis and the monitoring of therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10896690      PMCID: PMC1737062          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.69.2.178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  48 in total

1.  A voxel-based morphometry study of semantic dementia: relationship between temporal lobe atrophy and semantic memory.

Authors:  C J Mummery; K Patterson; C J Price; J Ashburner; R S Frackowiak; J R Hodges
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 2.  Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  D Neary; J S Snowden; L Gustafson; U Passant; D Stuss; S Black; M Freedman; A Kertesz; P H Robert; M Albert; K Boone; B L Miller; J Cummings; D F Benson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  The psychiatric differentiation of senility and arteriosclerosis.

Authors:  D P Birkett
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 9.319

4.  Specific impairments of planning.

Authors:  T Shallice
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1982-06-25       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia.

Authors:  C P Hughes; L Berg; W L Danziger; L A Coben; R L Martin
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 9.319

6.  Loss of social group affinity following prefrontal lesions in free-ranging macaques.

Authors:  R E Myers; C Swett; M Miller
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1973-12-21       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects.

Authors:  H E Nelson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  G McKhann; D Drachman; M Folstein; R Katzman; D Price; E M Stadlan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Slowly progressive aphasia without generalized dementia.

Authors:  M M Mesulam
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Regional pattern of degeneration in Alzheimer's disease: neuronal loss and histopathological grading.

Authors:  A Brun; E Englund
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 5.087

View more
  138 in total

1.  Changes in appetite, food preference, and eating habits in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  M Ikeda; J Brown; A J Holland; R Fukuhara; J R Hodges
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Characterization of apathy in persons with frontotemporal dementia and the impact on family caregivers.

Authors:  Jennifer Merrilees; Glenna A Dowling; Erin Hubbard; Judy Mastick; Robin Ketelle; Bruce L Miller
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.703

3.  Emotion regulation deficits in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Madeleine S Goodkind; Anett Gyurak; Megan McCarthy; Bruce L Miller; Robert W Levenson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-03

4.  Neuropsychiatric symptoms in primary progressive aphasia: phenomenology, pathophysiology, and approach to assessment and treatment.

Authors:  Mandana Modirrousta; Bruce H Price; Bradford C Dickerson
Journal:  Neurodegener Dis Manag       Date:  2013-04-01

5.  Alzheimer's disease and frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia-- a very brief battery for cognitive and behavioural distinction.

Authors:  Roberta Perri; Giacomo Koch; Giovanni A Carlesimo; Laura Serra; Lucia Fadda; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Carla Pettenati; Carlo Caltagirone
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Neuropsychological differences between frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a review.

Authors:  Michal Harciarek; Krzysztof Jodzio
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.444

7.  Sensitivity of current criteria for the diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  O Piguet; M Hornberger; B P Shelley; C M Kipps; J R Hodges
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  "Everything hurts!" Distress in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Megan S Barker; Hannah E Silverman; Rachel Fremont; Masood Manoochehri; Stephanie Cosentino; Edward D Huey
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Clinicopathologic differences among patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Mario F Mendez; Aditi Joshi; Kanida Tassniyom; Edmond Teng; Jill S Shapira
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 10.  Diagnosis and management of behavioral issues in frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Masood Manoochehri; Edward D Huey
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.