| Literature DB >> 21386699 |
Clay B Holroyd1, Olav E Krigolson, Seung Lee.
Abstract
A recent theory holds that a component of the human event-related brain potential called the reward positivity reflects a reward prediction error signal. We investigated this idea in gambling-like task in which, on each trial, a visual stimulus predicted a subsequent rewarding or nonrewarding outcome with 80% probability. Consistent with earlier results, we found that the reward positivity was larger to unexpected than to expected outcomes. In addition, we found that the predictive cues also elicited a reward positivity, as proposed by the theory. These results indicate that the reward positivity reflects the initial assessment of whether a trial will end in success or failure and the reappraisal of that information once the outcome actually occurs.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21386699 DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328345441d
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroreport ISSN: 0959-4965 Impact factor: 1.837