Literature DB >> 23547246

A neural signature of the creation of social evaluation.

Roman Osinsky1, Patrick Mussel2, Linda Ohrlein2, Johannes Hewig3.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that receiving an unfair monetary offer in economic bargaining elicits also-called feedback negativity (FN). This scalp-recorded brain potential probably reflects a bad-vs-good evaluation in the medial frontal cortex and has been linked to fundamental processes of reinforcement learning. In the present study, we investigated whether the evaluative mechanism indexed by the FN is also involved in learning who is an unfair vs fair bargaining partner. An electroencephalogram was recorded while participants completed a computerized version of the Ultimatum Game, repeatedly receiving fair or unfair monetary offers from alleged other participants. Some of these proposers were either always fair or always unfair in their offers. In each trial, participants first saw a portrait picture of the respective proposer before the monetary offer was presented. Therefore, the faces could be used as predictive cues for the fairness of the pending offers. We found that not only unfair offers themselves induced a FN, but also (over the task) faces of unfair proposers. Thus, when interaction partners repeatedly behave in an unfair way, their faces acquire a negative valence, which manifests in a basal neural mechanism of bad-vs-good evaluation.
© The Author (2013). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evaluative conditioning; feedback negativity; social evaluation; ultimatum game

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23547246      PMCID: PMC4040096          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nst051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  47 in total

1.  Getting to know you: reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange.

Authors:  Brooks King-Casas; Damon Tomlin; Cedric Anen; Colin F Camerer; Steven R Quartz; P Read Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Error-related negativities elicited by monetary loss and cues that predict loss.

Authors:  Jonathan P Dunning; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 3.  Integrating automatic and controlled processes into neurocognitive models of social cognition.

Authors:  Ajay B Satpute; Matthew D Lieberman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Affective state and decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  Mascha van 't Wout; René S Kahn; Alan G Sanfey; André Aleman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  COMT Val158Met genotype and the common basis of error and conflict monitoring.

Authors:  Roman Osinsky; Johannes Hewig; Nina Alexander; Jürgen Hennig
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Feedback-related potentials are sensitive to sequential order of decision outcomes in a gambling task.

Authors:  Roman Osinsky; Patrick Mussel; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Dopamine effects on human error processing depend on catechol-O-methyltransferase VAL158MET genotype.

Authors:  Erik M Mueller; Scott Makeig; Gerhard Stemmler; Jürgen Hennig; Jan Wacker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Social Comparison Affects Brain Responses to Fairness in Asset Division: An ERP Study with the Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  Yin Wu; Yuqin Zhou; Eric van Dijk; Marijke C Leliveld; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Associative learning of social value.

Authors:  Timothy E J Behrens; Laurence T Hunt; Mark W Woolrich; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  15 in total

1.  Smiling as negative feedback affects social decision-making and its neural underpinnings.

Authors:  Martin Weiß; Patrick Mussel; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game.

Authors:  Laura Kaltwasser; Andrea Hildebrandt; Oliver Wilhelm; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Face-induced expectancies influence neural mechanisms of performance monitoring.

Authors:  Roman Osinsky; Jennifer Seeger; Patrick Mussel; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  The interplay between feedback-related negativity and individual differences in altruistic punishment: An EEG study.

Authors:  Hendrik Mothes; Sören Enge; Alexander Strobel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  You have my word: reciprocity expectation modulates feedback-related negativity in the trust game.

Authors:  Qingguo Ma; Liang Meng; Qiang Shen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Ingroup/outgroup membership modulates fairness consideration: neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations.

Authors:  Yiwen Wang; Zhen Zhang; Liying Bai; Chongde Lin; Roman Osinsky; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Differences in Social Decision-Making between Proposers and Responders during the Ultimatum Game: An EEG Study.

Authors:  Sibylle K Horat; Anne Prévot; Jonas Richiardi; François R Herrmann; Grégoire Favre; Marco C G Merlo; Pascal Missonnier
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-11

8.  Neural evidence for description dependent reward processing in the framing effect.

Authors:  Rongjun Yu; Ping Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Influences of State and Trait Affect on Behavior, Feedback-Related Negativity, and P3b in the Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  Korbinian Riepl; Patrick Mussel; Roman Osinsky; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Impact of Short Social Training on Prosocial Behaviors: An fMRI Study.

Authors:  Evgeniya Lukinova; Mikhail Myagkov
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.