Literature DB >> 22983745

High temporal discounters overvalue immediate rewards rather than undervalue future rewards: an event-related brain potential study.

Avital S Cherniawsky1, Clay B Holroyd.   

Abstract

Impulsivity is characterized in part by heightened sensitivity to immediate relative to future rewards. Although previous research has suggested that "high discounters" in intertemporal choice tasks tend to prefer immediate over future rewards because they devalue the latter, it remains possible that they instead overvalue immediate rewards. To investigate this question, we recorded the reward positivity, a component of the event-related brain potential (ERP) associated with reward processing, with participants engaged in a task in which they received both immediate and future rewards and nonrewards. The participants also completed a temporal discounting task without ERP recording. We found that immediate but not future rewards elicited the reward positivity. High discounters also produced larger reward positivities to immediate rewards than did low discounters, indicating that high discounters relatively overvalued immediate rewards. These findings suggest that high discounters may be more motivated than low discounters to work for monetary rewards, irrespective of the time of arrival of the incentives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22983745     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-012-0122-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  40 in total

Review 1.  Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.

Authors:  G Ainslie
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Joel Myerson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 3.  Neural coding of basic reward terms of animal learning theory, game theory, microeconomics and behavioural ecology.

Authors:  Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Motivation of extended behaviors by anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Clay B Holroyd; Nick Yeung
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  The good, the bad and the neutral: electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli.

Authors:  Clay B Holroyd; Greg Hajcak; Jeff T Larsen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection.

Authors:  W H Miltner; C H Braun; M G Coles
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E Donchin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-04

8.  Hypersensitivity to reward in problem gamblers.

Authors:  Johannes Hewig; Nora Kretschmer; Ralf H Trippe; Holger Hecht; Michael G H Coles; Clay B Holroyd; Wolfgang H R Miltner
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN.

Authors:  Ben Eppinger; Jutta Kray; Barbara Mock; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Dopamine, time, and impulsivity in humans.

Authors:  Alex Pine; Tamara Shiner; Ben Seymour; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  20 in total

1.  What you give is what you get: Payment of one randomly selected trial induces risk-aversion and decreases brain responses to monetary feedback.

Authors:  Barbara Schmidt; Luisa Keßler; Holger Hecht; Johannes Hewig; Clay B Holroyd; Wolfgang H R Miltner
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  High sensation seeking is associated with behavioral and neural insensitivity to increased negative outcomes during decision-making under uncertainty.

Authors:  Sihua Xu; Lijuan Luo; Zhiguo Xiao; Ke Zhao; Hua Wang; Cencen Wang; Hengyi Rao
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Willing to wait: Elevated reward-processing EEG activity associated with a greater preference for larger-but-delayed rewards.

Authors:  Narun Pornpattananangkul; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 4.  Excessive discounting of delayed reinforcers as a trans-disease process: Update on the state of the science.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; Liqa N Athamneh; Julia C Basso; Alexandra M Mellis; William B DeHart; William H Craft; Derek Pope
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-02-06

5.  Blunted Reward Sensitivity and Trait Disinhibition Interact to Predict Substance Use Problems.

Authors:  Keanan J Joyner; Colin B Bowyer; James R Yancey; Noah C Venables; Jens Foell; Darrell A Worthy; Greg Hajcak; Bruce D Bartholow; Christopher J Patrick
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-09-01

6.  Implicit emotion regulation affects outcome evaluation.

Authors:  Qiwei Yang; Ping Tang; Ruolei Gu; Wenbo Luo; Yue-jia Luo
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Elevated outcome-anticipation and outcome-evaluation ERPs associated with a greater preference for larger-but-delayed rewards.

Authors:  Narun Pornpattananangkul; Ajay Nadig; Storm Heidinger; Keegan Walden; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  The delay effect on outcome evaluation: results from an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Chen Qu; Yunyun Huang; Yuru Wang; Yu-Xia Huang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Temporal Fluctuation of Mood in Gaming Task Modulates Feedback Negativity: EEG Study With Virtual Reality.

Authors:  Yusuke Yokota; Yasushi Naruse
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Impaired reward processing by anterior cingulate cortex in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Akina Umemoto; Carmen N Lukie; Kimberly A Kerns; Ulrich Müller; Clay B Holroyd
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.