Literature DB >> 21380745

Extension CT scan: its suitability for assessing fusion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Hiroaki Nakashima1, Yasutsugu Yukawa, Keigo Ito, Yumiko Horie, Masaaki Machino, Shunsuke Kanbara, Daigo Morita, Shiro Imagama, Naoki Ishiguro, Fumihiko Kato.   

Abstract

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is a popular procedure for treating lumbar canal stenosis with spinal instability, and several reports concerning fusion assessment methods exist. However, there are currently no definitive criteria for diagnosing a successful interbody fusion in the lumbar spine. We suggested evaluating fusion status using computed tomography (CT) in extension position to detect pseudoarthrosis more precisely. The purpose of this study was to evaluate its usefulness for determining bone union quality after PLIF. Eighty-one patients who underwent PLIF at 97 levels were retrospectively enrolled. The study population included 48 men and 33 women (mean age 58.9 years, range 21-85 years). Patients were followed up for more than 12 months after surgery. The mean follow-up period was 27.6 months (range 14-49 months). Fusion status was evaluated using three ways: flexion-extension radiographs, CT images in flexion and extension position. In the flexion-extension radiographs, mobility of more than 3°, a remaining clear zone, or an uncertain bone connection constituted an incomplete union. For CT images, a remaining clear zone, a gas pattern, or an uncertain bone connection constituted an incomplete union. Flexion-extension radiographs demonstrated a solid fusion in 90.7% of the 97 levels at 10.7 months postoperatively. When fusion was demonstrated on flexion-extension radiographs, the rate of fusion affirmed by flexion CT and extension CT was 87.6 and 69.1% of the levels assessed, respectively. The rate of pseudoarthrosis detected on extension CT images was significantly higher than that on flexion-extension radiographs (P < 0.001) and flexion CT (P < 0.01). The rate of fusion achieved on extension CT was 85.6% at 15.1 months postoperatively. Extension CT could detect pseudoarthrosis more clearly than flexion-extension radiography and flexion CT. The CT images are influenced by body position and dilating anterior disc space in extension CT contributes to detect pseudoarthrodesis. Thus, extension CT was a useful method for assessing fusion status after PLIF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21380745      PMCID: PMC3175889          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1739-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  15 in total

Review 1.  Symposium: a critical discrepancy-a criteria of successful arthrodesis following interbody spinal fusions.

Authors:  P C McAfee; S D Boden; J W Brantigan; R D Fraser; S D Kuslich; T R Oxland; M M Panjabi; C D Ray; T A Zdeblick
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion using carbon fiber cages.

Authors:  Edward R G Santos; David G Goss; Russel K Morcom; Robert D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Comparison of methods for determining the presence and extent of anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Stephen D Cook; Laura P Patron; Petros M Christakis; Kirk J Bailey; Charles Banta; Paul A Glazer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Effect of sagittal spinal balance, levels of posterior instrumentation, and length of follow-up on low back pain in patients undergoing posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease: a multifactorial analysis.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Thomas Repantis; Zisis Papazisis; Panagiotis Iliopoulos
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  CT evaluation of interbody fusion.

Authors:  S L Rothman; W V Glenn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Failed lumbar disc surgery requiring second operation. A long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  J W Frymoyer; R E Matteri; E N Hanley; D Kuhlmann; J Howe
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Comparison of plain radiographs with CT scan to evaluate interbody fusion following the use of titanium interbody cages and transpedicular instrumentation.

Authors:  Rajesh R Shah; Saeed Mohammed; Asif Saifuddin; Benjamin A Taylor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Pseudarthrosis following lumbar fusion: detection by direct coronal CT scanning.

Authors:  N Chafetz; C E Cann; J M Morris; L S Steinbach; H I Goldberg; L Ax
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Low-back pain after lumbar fusion. Surgical and computed tomographic analysis.

Authors:  E M Laasonen; J Soini
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Three-dimensional computed tomography and multiplanar reformations in the assessment of pseudarthrosis in posterior lumbar fusion patients.

Authors:  P Lang; H K Genant; N Chafetz; P Steiger; J M Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  13 in total

1.  Functional computed tomography scanning for evaluating fusion status after anterior cervical decompression fusion.

Authors:  Jun Ouchida; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Keigo Ito; Masaaki Machino; Taro Inoue; Keisuke Tomita; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Large volume inside the cage leading incomplete interbody bone fusion and residual back pain after posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Mikinobu Takeuchi; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Norimitsu Wakao; Atsuhiko Hirasawa; Katsuhisa Kawanami; Koji Osuka; Masakazu Takayasu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Volumetric change in interbody bone graft after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): a prospective study.

Authors:  Zenya Ito; Shiro Imagama; Tokumi Kanemura; Kotaro Satake; Kei Ando; Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Ryuichi Shinjo; Hideki Yagi; Tetsuro Hida; Kenyu Ito; Yoshimoto Ishikawa; Mikito Tsushima; Akiyuki Matsumoto; Hany El Zahlawy; Hidetoshi Yamaguchi; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Approach to interpret images produced by new generations of multidetector CT scanners in post-operative spine.

Authors:  Rania Zeitoun; Manar Hussein
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  M Formica; D Vallerga; A Zanirato; L Cavagnaro; M Basso; S Divano; L Mosconi; E Quarto; G Siri; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-01-01

6.  The use of beta-tricalcium phosphate and bone marrow aspirate as a bone graft substitute in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Martin Thaler; Ricarda Lechner; Michaela Gstöttner; Conrad Kobel; Christian Bach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Patients 80 Years of Age and Older with Lumbar Degenerative Disease: Minimum 2 Years' Follow-Up.

Authors:  Kazunori Hayashi; Akira Matsumura; Sadahiko Konishi; Minori Kato; Takashi Namikawa; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2016-02-19

8.  Hyper-Crosslinked Carbohydrate Polymer for Repair of Critical-Sized Bone Defects.

Authors:  Plamena M Koleva; James H Keefer; Alexandria M Ayala; Isabela Lorenzo; Christine E Han; Kristen Pham; Stacy E Ralston; Kee D Kim; Charles C Lee
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2019-07-01

9.  Fracture healing: a consensus report from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Fracture Working Group.

Authors:  S L Silverman; E S Kupperman; S V Bukata
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Reliability analysis of radiographic methods for determination of posterolateral lumbossacral fusion.

Authors:  Alberto Ofenhejm Gotfryd; Felipe de Moraes Pomar; Nicola Jorge Carneiro Neto; Fernando José Franzin; Luciano Miller Reis Rodrigues; Patricia Rios Poletto
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.