Literature DB >> 20354466

Effect of sagittal spinal balance, levels of posterior instrumentation, and length of follow-up on low back pain in patients undergoing posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease: a multifactorial analysis.

Panagiotis Korovessis1, Thomas Repantis, Zisis Papazisis, Panagiotis Iliopoulos.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective controlled clinical study on low back pain (LBP).
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possible effects of radiographic and other related parameters on LBP in patients underwent decompression and posterolateral instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Sagittal balance of the spine after spine surgery has gained increasing interest regarding its correlation with LBP and fusion rate. To our knowledge, no advanced statistical analysis on the effects of sagittal roentgenographic and other parameters on LBP after lumbar surgery has been published.
METHODS: Forty-five patients with an average age of 63 years, who underwent pedicle-screw fixation in 2, 3, and 4 vertebrae for degenerative lumbar spine disease were selected to be included in this study. Radiographic and self-assessment (bodily pain, short form-36) data were evaluated using advanced statistics (multifactorial analysis) to investigate all possible correlations between a dependent parameter (LBP) and independent parameters (sex, extension of instrumentation, sagittal spinal balance, and angular motion at the adjacent free level above instrumentation).
RESULTS: All patients were observed for an average of 5.5 years (range, 5-7 years). Male patients showed significantly more improvement of LBP than female counterparts (P = 0.024). LBP improved after surgery by the first year (P < 0.000) and thereafter decreased (P < 0.000) at the final evaluation, but remained at levels significantly higher than before surgery (P < 0.000). The deviation of the apical lumbar vertebra from C7-plumbline was correlated with LBP (P < 0.000). Patients, who received third- and fourth- level instrumentation had less LBP (P = 0.0245) than their counterparts, who received second-level instrumentation.
CONCLUSION: Improvement of sagittal deviation of apical lumbar vertebra, instrumentation of third or fourth vertebrae, male gender, and fusion success were correlated with postoperative improvement of LBP after posterior decompression and pedicle screw fixation for symptomatic degenerative lumbar spine disease.This research suggests that the methods directed at the improvement in sagittal spinal balance of the lumbar spine, careful selection of fusion levels, and improvement of fusion rate might be beneficial for decreasing LBP after surgery in degenerative lumbar spine disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20354466     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d51e84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

1.  Large volume inside the cage leading incomplete interbody bone fusion and residual back pain after posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Mikinobu Takeuchi; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Norimitsu Wakao; Atsuhiko Hirasawa; Katsuhisa Kawanami; Koji Osuka; Masakazu Takayasu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Extension CT scan: its suitability for assessing fusion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nakashima; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Keigo Ito; Yumiko Horie; Masaaki Machino; Shunsuke Kanbara; Daigo Morita; Shiro Imagama; Naoki Ishiguro; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Patient-Related Risk Factors for the Development of Lumbar Spine Adjacent Segment Pathology.

Authors:  Eduardo Moreira Pinto; Artur Teixeria; Richado Frada; Filipa Oliveira; Pedro Atilano; Tânia Veigas; António Miranda
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2021-06-24

4.  Postoperative impact of rod bending in the lumbar spine fusion surgery with polyaxial screws - Validation of a study.

Authors:  Sara Elisa Diniz; Filipa Cordeiro; Ana Ribau; João Vale; Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-01

5.  Instrumented posterolateral fusion - clinical and functional outcome in elderly patients.

Authors:  Stefan Endres
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2011-04-06

6.  The impact of sagittal balance on clinical results after posterior interbody fusion for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mi Kyung Kim; Sun-Ho Lee; Eun-Sang Kim; Whan Eoh; Sung-Soo Chung; Chong-Suh Lee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Instrumented intervertebral or posterolateral fusion in elderly patients: clinical results of a single center.

Authors:  Stefan Endres; Rene Aigner; Axel Wilke
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Radiographic Results of Minimally Invasive (MIS) Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LIF) Compared with Conventional Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Jae Kwan Lim; Sung Min Kim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2013-06-30

9.  Segmental and global lordosis changes with two-level axial lumbar interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation.

Authors:  Miguel A Melgar; William D Tobler; Robert J Ernst; Thomas J Raley; Neel Anand; Larry E Miller; Richard J Nasca
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

10.  Does L5-S1 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Improve Sagittal Alignment or Fusion Rates in Long Segment Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity?

Authors:  Andrew J Meyers; Joseph B Wick; Pope Rodnoi; Ahsan Khan; Eric O Klineberg
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.