Literature DB >> 3971636

CT evaluation of interbody fusion.

S L Rothman, W V Glenn.   

Abstract

Reformatted computed tomography (CT) of the spine is very useful in the evaluation of patients who have previously been treated by lumbar or cervical interbody fusions. It allows incontrovertible evidence of failure of osseous fusion as well as defines the major causes of residual or recurrent symptoms. As CT methodology becomes a routine procedure, it will be the primary diagnostic aid in evaluating postoperative posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3971636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  13 in total

Review 1.  CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts.

Authors:  Alan L Williams; Matthew F Gornet; J Kenneth Burkus
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Large volume inside the cage leading incomplete interbody bone fusion and residual back pain after posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Mikinobu Takeuchi; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Norimitsu Wakao; Atsuhiko Hirasawa; Katsuhisa Kawanami; Koji Osuka; Masakazu Takayasu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: review and update for radiologists.

Authors:  Kimia Khalatbari Kani; Felix S Chew
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Anterior cervical spine fusion: struts, plugs, and plates.

Authors:  D Karasick
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Utility of 18F sodium fluoride PET/CT imaging in the evaluation of postoperative pain following surgical spine fusion.

Authors:  D Pouldar; S Bakshian; R Matthews; V Rao; M Manzano; S Dardashti
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-02-06

6.  Extension CT scan: its suitability for assessing fusion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nakashima; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Keigo Ito; Yumiko Horie; Masaaki Machino; Shunsuke Kanbara; Daigo Morita; Shiro Imagama; Naoki Ishiguro; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Fusion rate after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with carbon fiber implant: 1-year follow-up of 51 patients.

Authors:  T Tullberg; B Brandt; J Rydberg; P Fritzell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  [Fusion criteria for cages as vertebral body replacement in thoracolumbar fractures].

Authors:  K J Schnake; T Görler; F Kandziora
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  The memory metal minimal access cage: a new concept in lumbar interbody fusion-a prospective, noncomparative study to evaluate the safety and performance.

Authors:  D Kok; R D Donk; F H Wapstra; A G Veldhuizen
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-04-08

10.  Reliability analysis of radiographic methods for determination of posterolateral lumbossacral fusion.

Authors:  Alberto Ofenhejm Gotfryd; Felipe de Moraes Pomar; Nicola Jorge Carneiro Neto; Fernando José Franzin; Luciano Miller Reis Rodrigues; Patricia Rios Poletto
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.