Literature DB >> 18760654

Biomechanical comparison between lumbar disc arthroplasty and fusion.

Shih-Hao Chen1, Zheng-Cheng Zhong, Chen-Sheng Chen, Wen-Jer Chen, Chinghua Hung.   

Abstract

The artificial disc is a mobile implant for degenerative disc replacement that attempts to lessen the degeneration of the adjacent elements. However, inconsistent biomechanical results for the neighboring elements have been reported in a number of studies. The present study used finite element (FE) analysis to explore the biomechanical differences at the surgical and both adjacent levels following artificial disc replacement and interbody fusion procedures. First, a three-dimensional FE model of a five-level lumbar spine was established by the commercially available medical imaging software Amira 3.1.1, and FE software ANSYS 9.0. After validating the five-level intact (INT) model with previous in vitro studies, the L3/L4 level of the INT model was modified to either insert an artificial disc (ProDisc II; ADR) or incorporate bilateral posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) cages with a pedicle screw fixation system. All models were constrained at the bottom of the L5 vertebra and subjected to 150N preload and 10Nm moments under four physiological motions. The ADR model demonstrated higher range of motion (ROM), annulus stress, and facet contact pressure at the surgical level compared to the non-modified INT model. At both adjacent levels, ROM and annulus stress were similar to that of the INT model and varied less than 7%. In addition, the greatest displacement of posterior annulus occurred at the superior-lateral region. Conversely, the PLIF model showed less ROM, less annulus stress, and no facet contact pressure at the surgical level compared to the INT model. The adjacent levels had obviously high ROM, annulus stress, and facet contact pressure, especially at the adjacent L2/3 level. In conclusion, the artificial disc replacement revealed no adjacent-level instability. However, instability was found at the surgical level, which might accelerate degeneration at the highly stressed annulus and facet joint. In contrast to disc replacement results, the posterior interbody fusion procedure revealed possibly accelerative degeneration of the annulus and facet joint at both adjacent levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18760654     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  22 in total

1.  The influence of intrinsic disc degeneration of the adjacent segments on its stress distribution after one-level lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Heoung-Jae Chun; Choon-Ki Lee; Bong-Soon Chang; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Effect of the cord pretension of the Dynesys dynamic stabilisation system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Chien-Lin Liu; Zheng-Cheng Zhong; Hung-Wei Hsu; Shih-Liang Shih; Shih-Tien Wang; Chinghua Hung; Chen-Sheng Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  In silico evaluation of a new composite disc substitute with a L3-L5 lumbar spine finite element model.

Authors:  Jérôme Noailly; Luigi Ambrosio; K Elizabeth Tanner; Josep A Planell; Damien Lacroix
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Prediction of complications and fusion outcomes of fused lumbar spine with or without fixation system under whole-body vibration.

Authors:  Qing-Dong Wang; Li-Xin Guo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Effect of sacral slope on the biomechanical behavior of the low lumbar spine.

Authors:  Yugang Jiang; Xiaojiang Sun; Xiongqi Peng; Jie Zhao; Kai Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Biomechanical analysis and design of a dynamic spinal fixator using topology optimization: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hung-Ming Lin; Chien-Lin Liu; Yung-Ning Pan; Chang-Hung Huang; Shih-Liang Shih; Shun-Hwa Wei; Chen-Sheng Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Biomechanical analysis of a new lumbar interspinous device with optimized topology.

Authors:  Chen-Sheng Chen; Shih-Liang Shih
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  How does lumbar degenerative disc disease affect the disc deformation at the cephalic levels in vivo?

Authors:  Shaobai Wang; Qun Xia; Peter Passias; Weishi Li; Kirkham Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Sheep cervical spine biomechanics: a finite element study.

Authors:  Nicole A DeVries Watson; Anup A Gandhi; Doug C Fredericks; Joseph D Smucker; Nicole M Grosland
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2014

10.  Quantifying Range of Motion and Stress Patterns at the Transitional Lumbosacral Junction: Pilot Study Using a Computational Model for Load-Bearing at Accessory L5-S1 Articulation.

Authors:  Niladri Kumar Mahato; Raja Dhason; Dv Raghu Ram
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.