Literature DB >> 21377939

Early follow-up outcomes after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the discover cervical disc prosthesis.

Junjie Du1, Mo Li, Hao Liu, Hao Meng, Qizhen He, Zhuojing Luo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although anterior cervical decompression and fusion has been used successfully in the treatment of symptomatic radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, biomechanical studies have suggested possible deleterious effects of cervical fusion on adjacent level kinematics. The emergence of cervical arthroplasty as an alternative to arthrodesis may restore a more normal spinal movement and reduces a kinematic strain on adjacent segments. To date, with existing prostheses, the risk adjacent segment disease has not been proven to be reduced using artificial disc replacement.
PURPOSE: The study was designed to investigate the surgical techniques and clinical effects of the Discover artificial cervical disc prosthesis in a Chinese population and observe the stability and range of movement in the early and immediate postoperative period. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: Our clinical study design was prospective, concurrently enrolled, and single-center trial of the artificial cervical disc prosthesis (DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA, USA) in the treatment of patients with single- and two-level degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine. PATIENT SAMPLE: Procedure was performed in 25 patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: The functional spinal unit (FSU) and global angles, segmental and overall range of motion, FSU heights, and clinical parameters checked with Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Odom's scale, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score were assessed.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients (26 discs) consecutively underwent cervical arthroplasty using the Discover artificial cervical disc in our hospital. Clinical and radiologic follow-up was performed. The radiographic parameters evaluated included the treated segments and the overall curvature of the cervical spine.
RESULTS: All the patients were assessed between 12 months and 18 months after surgery (average 15.3 months). According to Odom's scale, all 25 patients (26 levels) had good to excellent outcomes by independent assessment. Mean NDI, JOA, and VAS scores showed statistical improvements in the early and immediate postoperative period. The range of movement recovered to the preoperative value during the follow-up. The treated segment ultimately showed preservation of movement when compared with preoperative levels. No prosthesis subsidence or excursion was identified, and no heterotopic ossification was found in the replaced levels.
CONCLUSION: These early results from a small cohort demonstrate that cervical arthroplasty with the Discover artificial cervical disc for the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease may provide a good clinical outcome and preserves some motion postoperatively. Although early outcomes are promising, this is also a relatively new technology and prosthesis, long-term follow-up studies with larger patient numbers are required to assess safety and efficacy compared with alternative treatments.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21377939     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.01.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  11 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Rocco Papalia; Erika Albo; Leonardo Cortesi; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Does design matter? Cervical disc replacements under review.

Authors:  Michael D Staudt; Kaushik Das; Neil Duggal
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Hybrid Solutions for the Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Disk Disease.

Authors:  Stefan Alexander König; Sebastian Ranguis; Uwe Spetzger
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2015-11-19

4.  Cervical arthroplasty with Discover prosthesis: clinical outcomes and analysis of factors that may influence postoperative range of motion.

Authors:  Jun Li; Lei Liang; Xiao-fei Ye; Min Qi; Hua-jiang Chen; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  In vivo analysis of cervical kinematics after implantation of a minimally constrained cervical artificial disc replacement.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Juliane Zenner; Michael Mayer; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Kinematic analysis following implantation of the PRESTIGE LP.

Authors:  Izabela Kowalczyk; Navjot Chaudhary; Neil Duggal
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2013-12-01

7.  Footprint mismatch of cervical disc prostheses with Chinese cervical anatomic dimensions.

Authors:  Liang Dong; Ming-Sheng Tan; Qin-Hua Yan; Ping Yi; Feng Yang; Xiang-Sheng Tang; Qing-Ying Hao
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Preoperative T1 Slope as a Predictor of Change in Cervical Alignment and Range of Motion After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jianhui Zhao; Rui Jiang; Yuhui Yang; Rui Gu; Zhongli Gao; Jianlin Xiao; Shangjun Chen; Modi Yang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-12-09

9.  The Changes in Cervical Biomechanics After CTDR and Its Association With Heterotopic Ossification: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas Hui; Kevin Phan; Mei-Yi Lee; Jack Kerferd; Telvinderjit Singh; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-06-03

10.  Comparison of 2 Zero-Profile Implants in the Treatment of Single-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Preliminary Clinical Study of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty versus Fusion.

Authors:  Sheng Shi; Shuang Zheng; Xin-Feng Li; Li-Li Yang; Zu-De Liu; Wen Yuan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.