Literature DB >> 27465393

Does design matter? Cervical disc replacements under review.

Michael D Staudt1, Kaushik Das2, Neil Duggal3.   

Abstract

The present article reviews the design rationale of currently available cervical disc replacements. Recent prospective randomized control trials comparing cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion have demonstrated safety as well as equal or superior clinical results. Increasingly, more devices are becoming available on the market. Understanding design rationale will provide context for the surgeon to optimize decision making for the most appropriate prosthesis. Cervical arthroplasty is a technique that is undergoing rapid design refinement and development. Further improvements in device design will enable patient-specific device selection. Understanding the design rationale and complication profile of each device will improve clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial cervical disc; Biomaterials; Cervical arthroplasty; Complications; Design; Kinematics; Kyphosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27465393     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-016-0765-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  43 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of the degenerative diseases of cervical spine.

Authors:  U Agrillo; F Faccioli; P Fachinetti; G Gambardella; G Guizzardi; G Profeta
Journal:  J Neurosurg Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Seok Woo Kim; Jae Hyuk Shin; Jose Joefrey Arbatin; Moon Soo Park; Yung Khee Chung; Paul C McAfee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cervical Disk Replacement With Discover Versus Fusion in a Single-Level Cervical Disk Disease: A Prospective Single-Center Randomized Trial With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Marjan Rožanković; Sergej M Marasanov; Miroslav Vukić
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.876

4.  Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article.

Authors:  Reginald J Davis; Kee D Kim; Michael S Hisey; Gregory A Hoffman; Hyun W Bae; Steven E Gaede; Ralph F Rashbaum; Pierce Dalton Nunley; Daniel L Peterson; John K Stokes
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-09-06

5.  Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc.

Authors:  Gwynedd E Pickett; Jeffrey P Rouleau; Neil Duggal
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.

Authors:  Yang Hou; Yang Liu; Wen Yuan; Xinwei Wang; Huajiang Chen; Lili Yang; Ying Zhang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 7.  History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Heather A Gawel; Jasmine D Patel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Mid- to long-term outcomes after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chunpeng Ren; Yueming Song; Youdi Xue; Xi Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.

Authors:  Daniel Murrey; Michael Janssen; Rick Delamarter; Jeffrey Goldstein; Jack Zigler; Bobby Tay; Bruce Darden
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Cervical artificial disc replacement versus fusion in the cervical spine: a systematic review comparing multilevel versus single-level surgery.

Authors:  Christopher K Kepler; Erika D Brodt; Joseph R Dettori; Todd J Albert
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2012-02
View more
  8 in total

1.  Ranges of Cervical Intervertebral Disc Deformation During an In Vivo Dynamic Flexion-Extension of the Neck.

Authors:  Yan Yu; Haiqing Mao; Jing-Sheng Li; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Liming Cheng; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li; Thomas D Cha
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Editorial on "Long-term clinical outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial" by Sasso et al.

Authors:  Heeren S Makanji; Kenneth Nwosu; Christopher M Bono
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12

3.  Current Concepts of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.

Authors:  David Turkov; Alan Job; Cesar Iturriaga; Rohit B Verma
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

4.  In cervical arthroplasty, only prosthesis with flexible biomechanical properties should be used for achieving a near-physiological motion pattern.

Authors:  Manfred Muhlbauer; Ernst Tomasch; Wolfgang Sinz; Siegfried Trattnig; Hermann Steffan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Comparison of in vivo kinematic and radiological parameters of three cervical disc prostheses.

Authors:  Nicholas Chang; Ralph Mobbs; Nicholas Hui; Henry Lin
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-03-09

6.  Clinical Efficacy of Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Decompression for Symptomatic Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Xiao-Bing Zhao; Ya-Jie Ma; Hai-Jun Ma; Xin-Yu Zhang; Hong-Gang Zhou
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  In vitro biomechanical comparison after fixed- and mobile-core artificial cervical disc replacement versus fusion.

Authors:  Jigang Lou; Yuanchao Li; Beiyu Wang; Yang Meng; Tingkui Wu; Hao Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Normal intervertebral segment rotation of the subaxial cervical spine: An in vivo study of dynamic neck motions.

Authors:  Yan Yu; Jing-Sheng Li; Tao Guo; Zhao Lang; James D Kang; Liming Cheng; Guoan Li; Thomas D Cha
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 5.191

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.