Literature DB >> 21377735

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of the Spectralis, Cirrus, and RTVue optical coherence tomography devices in glaucoma.

Mauro T Leite1, Harsha L Rao, Linda M Zangwill, Robert N Weinreb, Felipe A Medeiros.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracies of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements obtained with the Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering, Dossenheim, Germany), Cirrus (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), and RTVue (Optovue Inc., Fremont, CA) devices for the detection of glaucoma.
DESIGN: Diagnostic, case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 233 (107 healthy, 126 glaucomatous) of 149 participants from the longitudinal Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) and from the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES).
METHODS: All participants underwent RNFL thickness imaging with the Spectralis, Cirrus, and RTVue devices in the same visit. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves adjusted for age and race were obtained for quadrants (superior, nasal, inferior, temporal) and global RNFL thickness for all instruments. Areas under ROC (AUC) and sensitivities at fixed specificities (80% and 95%) were calculated and compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy using AUCs and sensitivities at fixed specificities of 80% and 95%.
RESULTS: The RNFL thickness parameter with the largest AUCs was the superior quadrant for the Spectralis (0.88) and the global RNFL thickness for the Cirrus (0.88) and the RTVue (0.87). The pairwise comparison among the ROC curves showed no statistical difference for all parameters except for the nasal quadrant, which had significantly larger AUC in the Spectralis and RTVue compared with the Cirrus (P<0.03 for both comparisons). There were no significant differences in sensitivities among the best parameters from each instrument (P>0.05). The superior quadrant thickness measured with the Spectralis had sensitivity of 81.9% at a fixed specificity of 80% and 70% at a fixed specificity of 95%. The global thickness measured by the Cirrus had a sensitivity of 80.3% at a fixed specificity of 80% and 65.6% at a fixed specificity of 95%. For the RTVue, the global thickness had a sensitivity of 77.9% at a fixed specificity of 80% and 62.1% at a fixed specificity of 95%.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the spectral-domain optic coherence tomography (SD-OCT) instruments have different resolution and acquisition rates, their ability to detect glaucoma was similar.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21377735      PMCID: PMC3881436          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.11.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  32 in total

1.  Effect of disease severity on the performance of Cirrus spectral-domain OCT for glaucoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Mauro T Leite; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Harsha L Rao; Luciana M Alencar; Pamela A Sample; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Comparison of glaucoma diagnostic Capabilities of Cirrus HD and Stratus optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Seong Bae Park; Kyung Rim Sung; Sung Yong Kang; Kyung Ri Kim; Michael S Kook
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-12

3.  The effects of study design and spectrum bias on the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Diana Ng; Linda M Zangwill; Pamela A Sample; Christopher Bowd; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Use of progressive glaucomatous optic disk change as the reference standard for evaluation of diagnostic tests in glaucoma.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Pamela A Sample; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 5.  Limitations of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, and bayes' theorem in assessing diagnostic probabilities: a clinical example.

Authors:  K G Moons; G A van Es; J W Deckers; J D Habbema; D E Grobbee
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  [Diagnostic value of nerve fibre layer photography in glaucoma].

Authors:  J Herrmann; J Funk
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography a study on diagnostic agreement with Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph.

Authors:  Christopher Kai-shun Leung; Cong Ye; Robert N Weinreb; Carol Yim Lui Cheung; Quanliang Qiu; Shu Liu; Guihua Xu; Dennis Shun Chiu Lam
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and optic disc imaging for diagnosing glaucoma in patients suspected of having the disease.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Gianmarco Vizzeri; Linda M Zangwill; Luciana M Alencar; Pamela A Sample; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Scan quality effect on glaucoma discrimination by glaucoma imaging devices.

Authors:  K R Sung; G Wollstein; J S Schuman; R A Bilonick; H Ishikawa; K A Townsend; L Kagemann; M L Gabriele
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Comparison of retinal nerve fibre layer measurements from time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography systems.

Authors:  Davin E Johnson; Sherif R El-Defrawy; David R P Almeida; Robert J Campbell
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.882

View more
  74 in total

1.  2-D pattern of nerve fiber bundles in glaucoma emerging from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Mona K Garvin; Michael D Abràmoff; Kyungmoo Lee; Meindert Niemeijer; Milan Sonka; Young H Kwon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Quantitative analysis of the intraretinal layers and optic nerve head using ultra-high resolution optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yuhong Wang; Hong Jiang; Meixiao Shen; Byron L Lam; Delia Cabrera DeBuc; Yufeng Ye; Ming Li; Aizhu Tao; Yilei Shao; Jianhua Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Better performance of RTVue than Cirrus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in detecting band atrophy of the optic nerve.

Authors:  Makoto Nakamura; Kumiko Ishikawa-Tabuchi; Akiyasu Kanamori; Yuko Yamada; Akira Negi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement bias and imprecision across three spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices.

Authors:  Nancy M Buchser; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Richard A Bilonick; Yun Ling; Lindsey S Folio; Larry Kagemann; Robert J Noecker; Eiyass Albeiruti; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  The comparison of manual vs automated disc margin delineation using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  S M Iverson; M Sehi
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Reproducibility of SD-OCT-based ganglion cell-layer thickness in glaucoma using two different segmentation algorithms.

Authors:  Mona K Garvin; Kyungmoo Lee; Trudy L Burns; Michael D Abràmoff; Milan Sonka; Young H Kwon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Rates of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Loss in Contralateral Eyes of Glaucoma Patients with Unilateral Progression by Conventional Methods.

Authors:  Ting Liu; Andrew J Tatham; Carolina P B Gracitelli; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  Ultra high-resolution anterior segment optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis and management of ocular surface squamous neoplasia.

Authors:  Benjamin J Thomas; Anat Galor; Afshan A Nanji; Fouad El Sayyad; Jianhua Wang; Sander R Dubovy; Madhura G Joag; Carol L Karp
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 9.  Optic nerve head and fibre layer imaging for diagnosing glaucoma.

Authors:  Manuele Michelessi; Ersilia Lucenteforte; Francesco Oddone; Miriam Brazzelli; Mariacristina Parravano; Sara Franchi; Sueko M Ng; Gianni Virgili
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-30

10.  Glaucoma progression detection using nonlocal Markov random field prior.

Authors:  Akram Belghith; Christopher Bowd; Felipe A Medeiros; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.