Literature DB >> 23907624

The comparison of manual vs automated disc margin delineation using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

S M Iverson1, M Sehi.   

Abstract

AIMS: To examine the impact of manual vs automated disc margin delineation on optic nerve head (ONH) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) parameters using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT).
METHODS: A prospective cohort study consisting of normal, glaucoma suspect (GS) and glaucoma patients who underwent ONH and RNFL measurements using SDOCT technology (RTVue; Optovue Inc.). The retinal pigment epithelium/Bruch's membrane (RPE/BM) complex end points were automatically determined first, and were manually redefined subsequently. Analysis of variance, coefficient of variation (COV), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and Bland-Altman plots were used for the analyses.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine eyes of 50 subjects (age 68±10 years) consisting of 36 glaucoma, 56 GS, and 7 normal eyes were included. The RNFL thickness measurements were similar (P>0.05) between the two methods of demarcation, except for the inferior-nasal sector (P=0.04). For the ONH measurements, the cup-to-disc (C/D) ratio and rim area showed significant differences between the two methods (P<0.001). COV/CCC values for the ONH parameters were as follows: cup area 17.6%/0.88; cup volume 7.4%/0.91; average C/D ratio 18.1%/0.78; rim area 25.3%/0.69; and rim volume 42.6%/0.71, respectively. CCC/COV values for the RNFL parameters were as follows: average 2.1%/0.98; inferior-temporal quadrant 8.1%/0.79; inferior-nasal quadrant INQ quadrant 12.6%/0.67; SNQ quadrant 7.8%/0.83; and STQ quadrant 7.8%/0.88, respectively.
CONCLUSION: An overall high agreement and moderate-substantial concordance was observed between the demarcation methods. Automated disc margin delineation of SDOCT can be used reliably in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23907624      PMCID: PMC3806575          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2013.163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  29 in total

1.  An optical model of the human retinal nerve fiber layer: implications of directional reflectance for variability of clinical measurements.

Authors:  R W Knighton; C Qian
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Optical coherence tomography disc assessment in optic nerves with peripapillary atrophy.

Authors:  Edward Lai; Gadi Wollstein; Lori Lyn Price; Lelia A Paunescu; Paul C Stark; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

Review 3.  Primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Robert N Weinreb; Peng Tee Khaw
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-05-22       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Comparison of optic disc margin identified by color disc photography and high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Anita Manassakorn; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Jong S Kim; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Larry Kagemann; Michelle L Gabriele; Kyung Rim Sung; Tarkan Mumcuoglu; Jay S Duker; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01

5.  Optic disc parameters from optovue optical coherence tomography: comparison of manual versus automated disc rim determination.

Authors:  Nisreen K Mesiwala; Melike Pekmezci; Travis C Porco; Shan C Lin
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  J S Schuman; T Pedut-Kloizman; E Hertzmark; M R Hee; J R Wilkins; J G Coker; C A Puliafito; J G Fujimoto; E A Swanson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma.

Authors:  H A Quigley; G R Dunkelberger; W R Green
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-05-15       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Morphometric assessment of normal, suspect and glaucomatous optic discs with Stratus OCT and HRT II.

Authors:  M E Iliev; A Meyenberg; J G Garweg
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 10.  State-of-the-art retinal optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Wolfgang Drexler; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 21.198

View more
  6 in total

1.  Optical coherence tomography use in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Kiran Malhotra; Tanyatuth Padungkiatsagul; Heather E Moss
Journal:  Ann Eye Sci       Date:  2020-03-15

Review 2.  An evidence-based approach to the routine use of optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Angelica Ly; Jack Phu; Paula Katalinic; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Regression-Based Strategies to Reduce Refractive Error-Associated Glaucoma Diagnostic Bias When Using OCT and OCT Angiography.

Authors:  Keke Liu; Ou Tan; Qi Sheng You; Aiyin Chen; Jonathan C H Chan; Bonnie N K Choy; Kendrick C Shih; Jasper K W Wong; Alex L K Ng; Janice J C Cheung; Michael Y Ni; Jimmy S M Lai; Gabriel M Leung; Liang Liu; David Huang; Ian Y H Wong
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.048

4.  Effect of Signal Intensity on Measurement of Ganglion Cell Complex and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Scans in Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Xinbo Zhang; Shawn M Iverson; Ou Tan; David Huang
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Optic disc morphology in unilateral branch retinal vein occlusion using spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Andrea Szigeti; Miklós Schneider; Mónika Ecsedy; Zoltán Zs Nagy; Zsuzsanna Récsán
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Artifact Rates for 2D Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Versus 3D Neuroretinal Rim Thickness Using Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Elli A Park; Edem Tsikata; Jenny Jyoung Lee; Eric Shieh; Boy Braaf; Benjamin J Vakoc; Brett E Bouma; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.283

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.