PURPOSE: To compare the reproducibility of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT)-based ganglion cell-layer-plus-inner plexiform-layer (GCL+IPL) thickness measurements for glaucoma patients obtained using both a publicly available and a commercially available algorithm. METHODS: Macula SD-OCT volumes (200 × 200 × 1024 voxels, 6 × 6 × 2 mm(3)) were obtained prospectively from both eyes of patients with open-angle glaucoma or with suspected glaucoma on two separate visits within 4 months. The combined GCL+IPL thickness was computed for each SD-OCT volume within an elliptical annulus centered at the fovea, based on two algorithms: (1) a previously published graph-theoretical layer segmentation approach developed at the University of Iowa, and (2) a ganglion cell analysis module of version 6 of Cirrus software. The mean overall thickness of the elliptical annulus was computed as was the thickness within six sectors. For statistical analyses, eyes with an SD-OCT volume with low signal strength (<6), image acquisition errors, or errors in performing the commercial GCL+IPL analysis in at least one of the repeated acquisitions were excluded. RESULTS: Using 104 eyes (from 56 patients) with repeated measurements, we found the intraclass correlation coefficient for the overall elliptical annular GCL+IPL thickness to be 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97-0.99) with the Iowa algorithm and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97) with the Cirrus algorithm; the intervisit SDs were 1.55 μm (Iowa) and 2.45 μm (Cirrus); and the coefficients of variation were 2.2% (Iowa) and 3.5% (Cirrus), P < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: SD-OCT-based GCL+IPL thickness measurements in patients with early glaucoma are highly reproducible.
PURPOSE: To compare the reproducibility of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT)-based ganglion cell-layer-plus-inner plexiform-layer (GCL+IPL) thickness measurements for glaucomapatients obtained using both a publicly available and a commercially available algorithm. METHODS: Macula SD-OCT volumes (200 × 200 × 1024 voxels, 6 × 6 × 2 mm(3)) were obtained prospectively from both eyes of patients with open-angle glaucoma or with suspected glaucoma on two separate visits within 4 months. The combined GCL+IPL thickness was computed for each SD-OCT volume within an elliptical annulus centered at the fovea, based on two algorithms: (1) a previously published graph-theoretical layer segmentation approach developed at the University of Iowa, and (2) a ganglion cell analysis module of version 6 of Cirrus software. The mean overall thickness of the elliptical annulus was computed as was the thickness within six sectors. For statistical analyses, eyes with an SD-OCT volume with low signal strength (<6), image acquisition errors, or errors in performing the commercial GCL+IPL analysis in at least one of the repeated acquisitions were excluded. RESULTS: Using 104 eyes (from 56 patients) with repeated measurements, we found the intraclass correlation coefficient for the overall elliptical annular GCL+IPL thickness to be 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97-0.99) with the Iowa algorithm and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97) with the Cirrus algorithm; the intervisit SDs were 1.55 μm (Iowa) and 2.45 μm (Cirrus); and the coefficients of variation were 2.2% (Iowa) and 3.5% (Cirrus), P < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS:SD-OCT-based GCL+IPL thickness measurements in patients with early glaucoma are highly reproducible.
Authors: Mona K Garvin; Michael D Abràmoff; Kyungmoo Lee; Meindert Niemeijer; Milan Sonka; Young H Kwon Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jean-Claude Mwanza; Mary K Durbin; Donald L Budenz; Fouad E Sayyad; Robert T Chang; Arvind Neelakantan; David G Godfrey; Randy Carter; Alan S Crandall Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Gwénolé Quellec; Kyungmoo Lee; Martin Dolejsi; Mona K Garvin; Michael D Abràmoff; Milan Sonka Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Jean-Claude Mwanza; Robert T Chang; Donald L Budenz; Mary K Durbin; Mohamed G Gendy; Wei Shi; William J Feuer Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jean-Claude Mwanza; Jonathan D Oakley; Donald L Budenz; Robert T Chang; O'Rese J Knight; William J Feuer Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-10-21 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Mauro T Leite; Harsha L Rao; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Felipe A Medeiros Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-03-05 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: P Carpineto; L Toto; R Aloia; V Ciciarelli; E Borrelli; E Vitacolonna; M Di Nicola; L Di Antonio; R Mastropasqua Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Robert A Avery; Avital Cnaan; Joel S Schuman; Chieh-Li Chen; Natalie C Glaug; Roger J Packer; Graham E Quinn; Hiroshi Ishikawa Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Robert A Avery; Avital Cnaan; Joel S Schuman; Chieh-Li Chen; Natalie C Glaug; Roger J Packer; Graham E Quinn; Hiroshi Ishikawa Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-06-28 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Jean-Claude Mwanza; Donald L Budenz; Joshua L Warren; Aaron D Webel; Courtney E Reynolds; Diego T Barbosa; Shan Lin Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Hema L Ramkumar; Brian Nguyen; Dirk-Uwe Bartsch; Luke J Saunders; Ilkay Kilic Muftuoglu; Qisheng You; William R Freeman Journal: Retina Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Xinbo Zhang; Anna Dastiridou; Brian A Francis; Ou Tan; Rohit Varma; David S Greenfield; Joel S Schuman; David Huang Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2017-09-28 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Florian Seidensticker; Lukas Reznicek; Thomas Mann; Irene Hübert; Anselm Kampik; Michael Ulbig; Christoph Hirneiss; Aljoscha S Neubauer; Marcus Kernt Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2014-06-27
Authors: Dirk-Uwe Bartsch; Igor Kozak; Igor Grant; Victoria L Knudsen; Robert N Weinreb; Byung Ro Lee; William R Freeman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 3.240