Literature DB >> 28280864

Measuring antenatal care use in Europe: is the content and timing of care in pregnancy tool applicable?

Katrien Beeckman1,2, Lucy Frith3, Helga Gottfreðsdóttir4, Annette Bernloehr5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Measuring of antenatal care utilisation is important from a public health perspective. The Content and Timing of care in Pregnancy tool (CTP) focuses on the care process and includes aspects on quality of care. The aim of the study is to gain insight in the applicability of the CTP tool across Europe.
METHODS: National guidelines for routine antenatal care were examined, analysing the degree to which the four items in the CTP tool were included in these guidelines.
RESULTS: From the 30 countries, 22 had a national guideline for routine antenatal care. The CTP tool is applicable in over 60% of the European countries with a national guideline.
CONCLUSIONS: The CTP tool can be used to measure antenatal care delivery in Europe. The tool is useful to evaluate the care process, focusing on rates of interventions as the closest approximation to the delivery of health care, with a focus on content of visits rather than simply the number of visits. Together with indicators measuring structure and outcome of health care, conclusions about the quality of care can be made.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antenatal care; Care process indicators; Clinical guidelines; Content of care; Health services research; Quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28280864     DOI: 10.1007/s00038-017-0959-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Public Health        ISSN: 1661-8556            Impact factor:   3.380


  32 in total

1.  Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Antenatal care in the European Union: a survey on guidelines in all 25 member states of the Community.

Authors:  Annette Bernloehr; Pam Smith; Vasso Vydelingum
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 3.  Group versus conventional antenatal care for women.

Authors:  Christine J Catling; Nancy Medley; Maralyn Foureur; Clare Ryan; Nicky Leap; Alison Teate; Caroline S E Homer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-04

4.  The relationship between antenatal care and preterm birth: the importance of content of care.

Authors:  Katrien Beeckman; Fred Louckx; Soo Downe; Koen Putman
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.367

5.  The content of prenatal care and its relationship to preterm birth in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Deborah E White; Nonie J Fraser-Lee; Suzanne Tough; Christine V Newburn-Cook
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2006-10

6.  An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.

Authors:  M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Clinical, provider and sociodemographic determinants of the number of antenatal visits in England and Wales.

Authors:  S Petrou; E Kupek; S Vause; M Maresh
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Maternal long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid status during early pregnancy and children's risk of problem behavior at age 5-6 years.

Authors:  Eva M Loomans; Bea R H Van den Bergh; Maaike Schelling; Tanja G M Vrijkotte; Manon van Eijsden
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  A comparison of four prenatal care indices in birth outcome models: comparable results for predicting small-for-gestational-age outcome but different results for preterm birth or infant mortality.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; John D Lantos; Juned Siddique; Diane S Lauderdale
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Adequacy of prenatal care among women living with human immunodeficiency virus: a population-based study.

Authors:  Ryan Ng; Erin M Macdonald; Mona R Loutfy; Mark H Yudin; Janet Raboud; Khatundi-Irene Masinde; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Wangari E Tharao; Jason Brophy; Richard H Glazier; Tony Antoniou
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Developing measures for WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience: a conceptual framework and scoping review.

Authors:  Samantha R Lattof; Özge Tunçalp; Allisyn C Moran; Maurice Bucagu; Doris Chou; Theresa Diaz; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.