Literature DB >> 8296842

Differences between black and white women in the use of prenatal care technologies.

K M Brett1, K C Schoendorf, J L Kiely.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the content of prenatal care received by black and white women in the United States differs, as measured by the use of amniocentesis, ultrasonography, and tocolysis. STUDY
DESIGN: This study uses data from birth certificates issued for births occurring in the United States in 1990. Multivariate analyses were used to calculate the relative risk of receipt of each technology by black women compared with white women.
RESULTS: Amniocentesis was used substantially less frequently by black women (relative risk 0.6), whereas ultrasonography was received by black women slightly less frequently than white women (relative risk 0.9). Tocolysis used varied by plurality. Black women with singleton births were slightly more likely to receive tocolysis than were white women (relative risk 1.1), although the risk of idiopathic preterm delivery is estimated to be three times higher in black women. Black women with multiple births received tocolysis two thirds as often as white women.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that differences exist in the content of prenatal care received by black and white women in the United States. This finding should be followed up with more detailed studies to identify its cause and possible interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8296842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  14 in total

1.  Very-low-birthweight infants and income incongruity among African American and white parents in Chicago.

Authors:  J W Collins; A A Herman; R J David
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Maternal age specific risk rate estimates for Down syndrome among live births in whites and other races from Ohio and metropolitan Atlanta, 1970-1989.

Authors:  C A Huether; J Ivanovich; B S Goodwin; E L Krivchenia; V S Hertzberg; L D Edmonds; D S May; J H Priest
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Extent of documented adherence to recommended prenatal care content: provider site differences and effect on outcomes among low-income women.

Authors:  Arden Handler; Kristin Rankin; Deborah Rosenberg; Karabi Sinha
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-02

4.  Closing the Black-White gap in birth outcomes: a life-course approach.

Authors:  Michael C Lu; Milton Kotelchuck; Vijaya Hogan; Loretta Jones; Kynna Wright; Neal Halfon
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.847

5.  Adequacy of prenatal care utilization, maternal ethnicity, and infant birthweight in Chicago.

Authors:  J W Collins; S N Wall; R J David
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Cause-specific trends in neonatal mortality among black and white infants, United States, 1980-1995.

Authors:  S L Carmichael; S Iyasu; K Hatfield-Timajchy
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-06

7.  Racial differences in perceived barriers to prenatal care.

Authors:  S A Tossounian; K C Schoendorf; J L Kiely
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1997-12

8.  Low birth weight across generations.

Authors:  James W Collins; Richard J David; Nikhil G Prachand; Michelle L Pierce
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2003-12

9.  Differing postneonatal mortality rates of African-American and white infants in Chicago: an ecologic study.

Authors:  Ellen M Papacek; James W Collins; Nancy Fisher Schulte; Corrie Goergen; Aimee Drolet
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2002-06

10.  Provider adherence to recommended prenatal care content: does it differ for obese women?

Authors:  Michelle A Kominiarek; Kristin Rankin; Arden Handler
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.