Literature DB >> 16473025

Interactions between ego- and allocentric neuronal representations of space.

S F W Neggers1, R H J Van der Lubbe, N F Ramsey, A Postma.   

Abstract

In the primate brain, visual spatial representations express distances of objects with regard to different references. In the parietal cortex, distances are thought to be represented with respect to the body (egocentric representation) and in superior temporal cortices with respect to other objects, independent of the observer (allocentric representation). However, these representations of space are interdependent, complicating such distinctions. Specifically, an object's position within a background frame strongly biases egocentric position location judgments. This bias, however, is absent for pointing movements towards that same object. More recent theories state that dorsal parietal spatial representations subserve visuomotor processing, whereas temporal lobe representations subserve memory and cognition. Therefore, it may be hypothesized that parietal egocentric representations, responsible for movement control, are not influenced by irrelevant allocentric cues, whereas ventral representations are. In an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study, subjects judged target bar locations relative to their body (egocentric task) or a background bar (allocentric task). Activity in the superior parietal lobule (SPL) was shown to increase during egocentric judgments, but not during allocentric judgments. The superior temporal gyrus (STG) shows a negative BOLD response during allocentric judgments and no activation during egocentric judgments. During egocentric judgments, the irrelevant background influenced activity in the posterior commissure and the medial temporal gyrus. SPL activity was unaffected by the irrelevant background during egocentric judgments. Sensitivity to spatial perceptual biases is apparently limited to occipito-temporal areas, subserving the observed biased cognitive reports of location, and is not found in parietal areas, subserving unbiased goal-directed actions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16473025     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  46 in total

1.  The interplay between posture control and memory for spatial locations.

Authors:  Michael A Riley; Suvobrata Mitra; Nichole Saunders; Adam W Kiefer; Sebastian Wallot
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Asymmetric Influence of Egocentric Representation onto Allocentric Perception.

Authors:  Yang Zhou; Yining Liu; Wangzikang Zhang; Mingsha Zhang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Human body schema perception depends on lateral preferences.

Authors:  A S Zartor; M M Mikheev; S V Afanasiev
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

4.  Configural cue performance in identical twins discordant for posttraumatic stress disorder: theoretical implications for the role of hippocampal function.

Authors:  Mark W Gilbertson; Stephanie K Williston; Lynn A Paulus; Natasha B Lasko; Tamara V Gurvits; Martha E Shenton; Roger K Pitman; Scott P Orr
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 5.  Is our brain hardwired to produce God, or is our brain hardwired to perceive God? A systematic review on the role of the brain in mediating religious experience.

Authors:  Alexander A Fingelkurts; Andrew A Fingelkurts
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-05-27

Review 6.  Multiple reference frames used by the human brain for spatial perception and memory.

Authors:  Gaspare Galati; Gina Pelle; Alain Berthoz; Giorgia Committeri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Locomotor and verbal distance judgments in action and vista space.

Authors:  Johanna Bergmann; Elsa Krauss; Agnes Münch; Reiner Jungmann; Daniel Oberfeld; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Impaired distance perception and size constancy following bilateral occipitoparietal damage.

Authors:  Marian E Berryhill; Robert Fendrich; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The representation of object distance: evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology.

Authors:  Marian E Berryhill; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Social distance evaluation in human parietal cortex.

Authors:  Yoshinori Yamakawa; Ryota Kanai; Michikazu Matsumura; Eiichi Naito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.