Literature DB >> 21360747

Arterial input functions determined from MR signal magnitude and phase for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the human pelvis.

Greg O Cron1, Claire Foottit, Thomas E Yankeelov, Leonard I Avruch, Mark E Schweitzer, Ian Cameron.   

Abstract

Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI is often used to measure the transfer constant (Ktrans) and distribution volume (ve) in pelvic tumors. For optimal accuracy and reproducibility, one must quantify the arterial input function (AIF). Unfortunately, this is challenging due to inflow and signal saturation. A potential solution is to use MR signal phase (ϕ), which is relatively unaffected by these factors. We hypothesized that phase-derived AIFs (AIFϕ) would provide more reproducible Ktrans and ve values than magnitude-derived AIFs (AIF|S|). We tested this in 27 prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies (echo time=2.56 ms, temporal resolution=13.5 s), using muscle as a standard. AIFϕ peak amplitude varied much less as a function of measurement location (inferior-superior) than AIF|S| (5.6±0.6 mM vs. 2.6±1.5 mM), likely as a result of ϕ inflow insensitivity. However, our main hypothesis was not confirmed. The best AIF|S| provided similar reproducibility versus AIFϕ (interpatient muscle Ktrans=0.039±0.021 min(-1) vs. 0.037±0.025 min(-1), ve=0.090±0.041 vs. 0.062±0.022, respectively).
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21360747      PMCID: PMC5556949          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  27 in total

1.  Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts.

Authors:  P S Tofts; A G Kermode
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Comparison of a reference region model with direct measurement of an AIF in the analysis of DCE-MRI data.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Greg O Cron; Christina L Addison; Julia C Wallace; Ruth C Wilkins; Bruce A Pappas; Giles E Santyr; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as a predictor of tumour response to radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mark A Zahra; Kieren G Hollingsworth; Evis Sala; David J Lomas; Li T Tan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Pharmacokinetics of GdDTPA/dimeglumine after intravenous injection into healthy volunteers.

Authors:  H J Weinmann; M Laniado; W Mützel
Journal:  Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR       Date:  1984

5.  Determination of the venous output function from MR signal phase: feasibility for quantitative DCE-MRI in human brain.

Authors:  Claire Foottit; Greg O Cron; Matthew J Hogan; Thanh Binh Nguyen; Ian Cameron
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Functional imaging of colorectal cancer angiogenesis.

Authors:  Vicky Goh; Anwar R Padhani; Shahnawaz Rasheed
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic MRI of normal human tissues.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Carmel Hayes; Sabine Landau; Martin O Leach
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Cellular-interstitial water exchange and its effect on the determination of contrast agent concentration in vivo: dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of human internal obturator muscle.

Authors:  David L Buckley; Lucy E Kershaw; Greg J Stanisz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Use of cardiac output to improve measurement of input function in quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Jeff L Zhang; Henry Rusinek; Louisa Bokacheva; Qun Chen; Pippa Storey; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer localization.

Authors:  A S N Jackson; S A Reinsberg; S A Sohaib; E M Charles-Edwards; S Jhavar; T J Christmas; A C Thompson; M J Bailey; C M Corbishley; C Fisher; M O Leach; D P Dearnaley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  8 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging using a phase-derived vascular input function in the preoperative grading of gliomas.

Authors:  T B Nguyen; G O Cron; J F Mercier; C Foottit; C H Torres; S Chakraborty; J Woulfe; G H Jansen; J M Caudrelier; J Sinclair; M J Hogan; R E Thornhill; I G Cameron
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Correction of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver.

Authors:  Hesheng Wang; Yue Cao
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Differentiation between glioblastoma and primary CNS lymphoma: application of DCE-MRI parameters based on arterial input function obtained from DSC-MRI.

Authors:  Koung Mi Kang; Seung Hong Choi; Park Chul-Kee; Tae Min Kim; Sung-Hye Park; Joo Ho Lee; Soon-Tae Lee; Inpyeong Hwang; Roh-Eul Yoo; Tae Jin Yun; Ji-Hoon Kim; Chul-Ho Sohn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI to Study Atherosclerotic Plaque Microvasculature.

Authors:  Raf H M van Hoof; Sylvia Heeneman; Joachim E Wildberger; M Eline Kooi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.113

5.  Use of Indicator Dilution Principle to Evaluate Accuracy of Arterial Input Function Measured With Low-Dose Ultrafast Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Shiyang Wang; Xiaobing Fan; Yue Zhang; Milica Medved; Dianning He; Ambereen Yousuf; Ernest Jamison; Aytekin Oto; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2019-06

6.  Improved repeatability of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using the complex MRI signal to derive arterial input functions: a test-retest study in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Edzo M E Klawer; Petra J van Houdt; Frank F J Simonis; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Floris J Pos; Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Sofie Isebaert; Karin Haustermans; Uulke A van der Heide
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Phantom Validation of DCE-MRI Magnitude and Phase-Based Vascular Input Function Measurements.

Authors:  Warren Foltz; Brandon Driscoll; Sangjune Laurence Lee; Krishna Nayak; Naren Nallapareddy; Ali Fatemi; Cynthia Ménard; Catherine Coolens; Caroline Chung
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2019-03

8.  Quantifying MRI T1 relaxation in flowing blood: implications for arterial input function measurement in DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Matthew N Gwilliam; David J Collins; Martin O Leach; Matthew R Orton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.039

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.