Literature DB >> 19168692

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer localization.

A S N Jackson1, S A Reinsberg, S A Sohaib, E M Charles-Edwards, S Jhavar, T J Christmas, A C Thompson, M J Bailey, C M Corbishley, C Fisher, M O Leach, D P Dearnaley.   

Abstract

Radiotherapy dose escalation improves tumour control in prostate cancer but with increased toxicity. Boosting focal tumour only may allow dose escalation with acceptable toxicity. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy can deliver this, but visualization of the tumour remains limiting. CT or conventional MRI techniques are poor at localizing tumour, but dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) may be superior. 18 patients with prostate cancer had T(2) weighted (T2W) and DCE-MRI prior to prostatectomy. The prostate was sectioned meticulously so as to achieve accurate correlation between imaging and pathology. The accuracy of DCE-MRI for cancer detection was calculated by a pixel-by-pixel correlation of quantitative DCE-MRI parameter maps and pathology. In addition, a radiologist interpreted the DCE-MRI and T2W images. The location of tumour on imaging was compared with histology, and the accuracy of DCE-MRI and T2W images was then compared. Pixel-by-pixel comparison of quantitative parameter maps showed a significant difference between the benign peripheral zone and tumour for the parameters K(trans), v(e) and k(ep). Calculation of areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the pharmacokinetic parameters were only "fair" discriminators between cancer and benign gland. Interpretation of DCE-MRI and T2W images by a radiologist showed DCE-MRI to be more sensitive than T2W images for tumour localization (50% vs 21%; p = 0.006) and similarly specific (85% vs 81%; p = 0.593). The superior sensitivity of DCE-MRI compared with T2W images, together with its high specificity, is arguably sufficient for its use in guiding radiotherapy boosts in prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19168692     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/89518905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  35 in total

Review 1.  Focal therapy of prostate cancer: evidence-based analysis for modern selection criteria.

Authors:  Michael R Abern; Matvey Tsivian; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Device for sectioning prostatectomy specimens to facilitate comparison between histology and in vivo MRI.

Authors:  Bryn Drew; Edward C Jones; Stefan Reinsberg; Andrew C Yung; S Larry Goldenberg; Piotr Kozlowski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and pharmacokinetic models in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tobias Franiel; Bernd Hamm; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Pathology: the lottery of conventional prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  A Giant Thoracic Duct Cyst as the Cause of Abdomen Pain: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Xinyue Wan; Zhongyin Zhou
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 6.  Optimum slicing of radical prostatectomy specimens for correlation between histopathology and medical images.

Authors:  Li Hong Chen; Henry Ho; Richie Lazaro; Choon Hua Thng; John Yuen; Wan Sing Ng; Chris Cheng
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging.

Authors:  Seung Hwan Lee; Kyung Kgi Park; Kyung Hwa Choi; Beom Jin Lim; Joo Hee Kim; Seung Wook Lee; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Overview of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Sadhna Verma; Baris Turkbey; Naira Muradyan; Arumugam Rajesh; Francois Cornud; Masoom A Haider; Peter L Choyke; Mukesh Harisinghani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Linda M Johnson; Baris Turkbey; William D Figg; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Change in Salvage Radiotherapy Management Based on Guidance With FACBC (Fluciclovine) PET/CT in Postprostatectomy Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Oladunni O Akin-Akintayo; Ashesh B Jani; Oluwaseun Odewole; Funmilayo I Tade; Peter T Nieh; Viraj A Master; Leah M Bellamy; Raghuveer K Halkar; Chao Zhang; Zhengjia Chen; Mark M Goodman; David M Schuster
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.794

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.