Literature DB >> 21358485

Effects of viewing an evidence-based video decision aid on patients' treatment preferences for spine surgery.

Jon D Lurie1, Kevin F Spratt, Emily A Blood, Tor D Tosteson, Anna N A Tosteson, James N Weinstein.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Secondary analysis within a large clinical trial.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the changes in treatment preference before and after watching a video decision aid as part of an informed consent process. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A randomized trial with a similar decision aid in herniated disc patients had shown decreased rate of surgery in the video group, but the effect of the video on expressed preferences is not known.
METHODS: Subjects enrolling in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) with intervertebral disc herniation, spinal stenosis, or degenerative spondylolisthesis at 13 multidisciplinary spine centers across the United States were given an evidence-based videotape decision aid viewed prior to enrollment as part of informed consent.
RESULTS: Of the 2505 patients, 86% (n = 2151) watched the video and 14% (n = 354) did not. Watchers shifted their preference more often than nonwatchers (37.9% vs. 20.8%, P < 0.0001) and more often demonstrated a strengthened preference (26.2% vs. 11.1%, P < 0.0001). Among the 806 patients whose preference shifted after watching the video, 55% shifted toward surgery (P = 0.003). Among the 617 who started with no preference, after the video 27% preferred nonoperative care, 22% preferred surgery, and 51% remained uncertain.
CONCLUSION: After watching the evidence-based patient decision aid (video) used in SPORT, patients with specific lumbar spine disorders formed and/or strengthened their treatment preferences in a balanced way that did not appear biased toward or away from surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21358485      PMCID: PMC3115521          DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182055c1e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Geography and the debate over Medicare reform.

Authors:  John E Wennberg; Elliott S Fisher; Jonathan S Skinner
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2002 Jul-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Helping patients decide about back surgery: a randomized trial of an interactive video program.

Authors:  E A Phelan; R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; J N Weinstein; M A Ciol; W Kreuter; J F Howe
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Involving patients in clinical decisions: impact of an interactive video program on use of back surgery.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; J Weinstein; J Howe; M Ciol; A G Mulley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids.

Authors:  Annette M O'Connor; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; Ann Barry Flood
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 5.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; D Stacey; V Entwistle; H Llewellyn-Thomas; D Rovner; M Holmes-Rovner; V Tait; J Tetroe; V Fiset; M Barry; J Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003
  5 in total
  13 in total

1.  Increased preoperative knowledge reduces surgery-related anxiety: a randomised clinical trial in 100 spinal stenosis patients.

Authors:  Jukka Kesänen; Helena Leino-Kilpi; Teija Lund; Liisa Montin; Pauli Puukka; Kirsi Valkeapää
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Can Decision Support Help Patients With Spinal Stenosis Make a Treatment Choice?: A Prospective Study Assessing the Impact of a Patient Decision Aid and Health Coaching.

Authors:  Stephen Kearing; Susan Z Berg; Jon D Lurie
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Current concepts of shared decision making in orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Klifto; Christopher Klifto; James Slover
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

4.  A comparison between different outcome measures based on "meaningful important differences" in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Maria M Wertli; Franziska Christina Buletti; Ulrike Held; Eva Rasmussen-Barr; Sherri Weiser; Jakob M Burgstaller; Johann Steurer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Shared Decision Making and Choice for Elective Surgical Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Emily F Boss; Nishchay Mehta; Neeraja Nagarajan; Anne Links; James R Benke; Zackary Berger; Ali Espinel; Jeremy Meier; Ellen A Lipstein
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Negative beliefs and psychological disturbance in spine surgery patients: a cause or consequence of a poor treatment outcome?

Authors:  S Havakeshian; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The Impact Of Decision Aids On Adults Considering Hip Or Knee Surgery.

Authors:  Vanessa B Hurley; Hector P Rodriguez; Stephen Kearing; Yue Wang; Ming D Leung; Stephen M Shortell
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Patient involvement in surgical treatment decisions and satisfaction with the treatment results after lumbar intervertebral discectomy.

Authors:  Tõnu Rätsep; Andreas Abel; Ülla Linnamägi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Decision Aid Implementation and Patients' Preferences for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment: Insights from the High Value Healthcare Collaborative.

Authors:  Vanessa B Hurley; Yue Wang; Hector P Rodriguez; Stephen M Shortell; Stephen Kearing; Lucy A Savitz
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 10.  Decision aids for people considering taking part in clinical trials.

Authors:  Katie Gillies; Seonaidh C Cotton; Jamie C Brehaut; Mary C Politi; Zoe Skea
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.