Literature DB >> 21357427

Effects of methanogenic inhibitors on methane production and abundances of methanogens and cellulolytic bacteria in in vitro ruminal cultures.

Zhenming Zhou1, Qingxiang Meng, Zhongtang Yu.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate and compare the effects of select antimethanogen compounds on methane production, feed digestion and fermentation, and populations of ruminal bacteria and methanogens using in vitro cultures. Seven compounds, including 2-bromoethanesulphonate (BES), propynoic acid (PA), nitroethane (NE), ethyl trans-2-butenoate (ETB), 2-nitroethanol (2NEOH), sodium nitrate (SN), and ethyl-2-butynote (EB), were tested at a final concentration of 12 mM. Ground alfalfa hay was included as the only substrate to simulate daily forage intake. Compared to no-inhibitor controls, PA, 2NEOH, and SN greatly reduced the production of methane (70 to 99%), volatile fatty acids (VFAs; 46 to 66%), acetate (30 to 60%), and propionate (79 to 82%), with 2NEOH reducing the most. EB reduced methane production by 23% without a significant effect on total VFAs, acetate, or propionate. BES significantly reduced the propionate concentration but not the production of methane, total VFAs, or acetate. ETB or NE had no significant effect on any of the above-mentioned measurements. Specific quantitative-PCR (qPCR) assays showed that none of the inhibitors significantly affected total bacterial populations but that they did reduce the Fibrobacter succinogenes population. SN reduced the Ruminococcus albus population, while PA and 2NEOH increased the populations of both R. albus and Ruminococcus flavefaciens. Archaeon-specific PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) showed that all the inhibitors affected the methanogen population structure, while archaeon-specific qPCR revealed a significant decrease in methanogen population in all treatments. These results showed that EB, ETB, NE, and BES can effectively reduce the total population of methanogens but that they reduce methane production to a lesser extent. The results may guide future in vivo studies to develop effective mitigation of methane emission from ruminants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21357427      PMCID: PMC3126374          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02779-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  32 in total

1.  Development and application of real-time PCR assays for quantification of erm genes conferring resistance to macrolides-lincosamides-streptogramin B in livestock manure and manure management systems.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Zhongtang Yu; Frederick C Michel; Thomas Wittum; Mark Morrison
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A vaccine against rumen methanogens can alter the composition of archaeal populations.

Authors:  Yvette J Williams; Sam Popovski; Suzanne M Rea; Lucy C Skillman; Andrew F Toovey; Korinne S Northwood; André-Denis G Wright
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Preliminary observations on the relationship between gas production and microbial protein synthesis in vitro.

Authors:  U Krishnamoorthy; H Steingass; K H Menke
Journal:  Arch Tierernahr       Date:  1991-06

4.  Methane emissions from beef cattle: effects of fumaric acid, essential oil, and canola oil.

Authors:  K A Beauchemin; S M McGinn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effect of tea saponin on methanogenesis, microbial community structure and expression of mcrA gene, in cultures of rumen micro-organisms.

Authors:  Y Q Guo; J-X Liu; Y Lu; W Y Zhu; S E Denman; C S McSweeney
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.858

6.  Investigating unsaturated fat, monensin, or bromoethanesulfonate in continuous cultures retaining ruminal protozoa. I. Fermentation, biohydrogenation, and microbial protein synthesis.

Authors:  S K R Karnati; J T Sylvester; C V D M Ribeiro; L E Gilligan; J L Firkins
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Effects of several inhibitors on pure cultures of ruminal methanogens.

Authors:  E M Ungerfeld; S R Rust; D R Boone; Y Liu
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Methane emissions from cattle.

Authors:  K A Johnson; D E Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples.

Authors:  Zhongtang Yu; Mark Morrison
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.993

10.  Inhibition of methanogens by bromochloromethane: effects on microbial communities and rumen fermentation using batch and continuous fermentations.

Authors:  Gunjan Goel; Harinder P S Makkar; Klaus Becker
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.718

View more
  29 in total

1.  Targeting methanogenesis with a nitrooxypropanol bullet.

Authors:  Stephen W Ragsdale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effects of essential oils on methane production and fermentation by, and abundance and diversity of, rumen microbial populations.

Authors:  Amlan K Patra; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  A volatile relationship: profiling an inter-kingdom dialogue between two plant pathogens, Ralstonia Solanacearum and Aspergillus Flavus.

Authors:  Joseph E Spraker; Kelsea Jewell; Ludmila V Roze; Jacob Scherf; Dora Ndagano; Randolph Beaudry; John E Linz; Caitilyn Allen; Nancy P Keller
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  A Win-Loss Interaction on Fe0 Between Methanogens and Acetogens From a Climate Lake.

Authors:  Paola Andrea Palacios; Warren Russell Francis; Amelia-Elena Rotaru
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Effects of Nitrate Addition on Rumen Fermentation, Bacterial Biodiversity and Abundance.

Authors:  Liping Zhao; Qingxiang Meng; Liping Ren; Wei Liu; Xinzhuang Zhang; Yunlong Huo; Zhenming Zhou
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Isolation of microorganisms involved in reduction of crystalline iron(III) oxides in natural environments.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Hori; Tomo Aoyagi; Hideomi Itoh; Takashi Narihiro; Azusa Oikawa; Kiyofumi Suzuki; Atsushi Ogata; Michael W Friedrich; Ralf Conrad; Yoichi Kamagata
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Effects of Flavonoid-rich Plant Extracts on In vitro Ruminal Methanogenesis, Microbial Populations and Fermentation Characteristics.

Authors:  Eun T Kim; Le Luo Guan; Shin J Lee; Sang M Lee; Sang S Lee; Il D Lee; Su K Lee; Sung S Lee
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.509

8.  Microbial ecology in anaerobic digestion at agitated and non-agitated conditions.

Authors:  Zhuoli Tian; Léa Cabrol; Gonzalo Ruiz-Filippi; Pratap Pullammanappallil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Spatial and temporal variations of microbial community in a mixed plug-flow loop reactor fed with dairy manure.

Authors:  Yueh-Fen Li; Po-Hsu Chen; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.813

10.  Effects of Adaptation of In vitro Rumen Culture to Garlic Oil, Nitrate, and Saponin and Their Combinations on Methanogenesis, Fermentation, and Abundances and Diversity of Microbial Populations.

Authors:  Amlan K Patra; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.