Literature DB >> 19201957

A vaccine against rumen methanogens can alter the composition of archaeal populations.

Yvette J Williams1, Sam Popovski, Suzanne M Rea, Lucy C Skillman, Andrew F Toovey, Korinne S Northwood, André-Denis G Wright.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to formulate a vaccine based upon the different species/strains of methanogens present in sheep intended to be immunized and to determine if a targeted vaccine could be used to decrease the methane output of the sheep. Two 16S rRNA gene libraries were used to survey the methanogenic archaea in sheep prior to vaccination, and methanogens representing five phylotypes were found to account for >52% of the different species/strains of methanogens detected. A vaccine based on a mixture of these five methanogens was then formulated, and 32 sheep were vaccinated on days 0, 28, and 103 with either a control or the anti-methanogen vaccine. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis revealed that each vaccination with the anti-methanogen formulation resulted in higher specific immunoglobulin G titers in plasma, saliva, and rumen fluid. Methane output levels corrected for dry-matter intake for the control and treatment groups were not significantly different, and real-time PCR data also indicated that methanogen numbers were not significantly different for the two groups after the second vaccination. However, clone library data indicated that methanogen diversity was significantly greater in sheep receiving the anti-methanogen vaccine and that the vaccine may have altered the composition of the methanogen population. A correlation between 16S rRNA gene sequence relatedness and cross-reactivity for the methanogens (R(2) = 0.90) also exists, which suggests that a highly specific vaccine can be made to target specific strains of methanogens and that a more broad-spectrum approach is needed for success in the rumen. Our data also suggest that methanogens take longer than 4 weeks to adapt to dietary changes and call into question the validity of experimental results based upon a 2- to 4-week acclimatization period normally observed for bacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19201957      PMCID: PMC2663202          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02453-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  17 in total

1.  Molecular diversity of rumen methanogens from sheep in Western Australia.

Authors:  André-Denis G Wright; Andrew J Williams; Barbara Winder; Claus T Christophersen; Sharon L Rodgers; Kellie D Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness.

Authors:  Patrick D Schloss; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Molecular identification of methanogenic archaea from sheep in Queensland, Australia reveal more uncultured novel archaea.

Authors:  André-Denis G Wright; Andrew F Toovey; Carolyn L Pimm
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 3.331

4.  Reponses of sheep to a vaccination of entodinial or mixed rumen protozoal antigens to reduce rumen protozoal numbers.

Authors:  Yvette J Williams; Suzanne M Rea; Sam Popovski; Carolyn L Pimm; Andrew J Williams; Andrew F Toovey; Lucy C Skillman; André-Denis G Wright
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  Phylogenetic analysis of methanogens from the bovine rumen.

Authors:  M F Whitford; R M Teather; R J Forster
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2001-05-16       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Detection of methanogens and proteobacteria from a single cell of rumen ciliate protozoa.

Authors:  Chagan Irbis; Kazunari Ushida
Journal:  J Gen Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.452

7.  Methanobrevibacter phylotypes are the dominant methanogens in sheep from Venezuela.

Authors:  André-Denis G Wright; Xuanli Ma; Nestor E Obispo
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-12-29       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Reducing methane emissions in sheep by immunization against rumen methanogens.

Authors:  A D G Wright; P Kennedy; C J O'Neill; A F Toovey; S Popovski; S M Rea; C L Pimm; L Klein
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  16S rDNA directed PCR primers and detection of methanogens in the bovine rumen.

Authors:  L C Skillman; P N Evans; C Strömpl; K N Joblin
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.858

10.  Use of phylogenetically based hybridization probes for studies of ruminal microbial ecology.

Authors:  D A Stahl; B Flesher; H R Mansfield; L Montgomery
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  24 in total

1.  Real-time PCR assays for monitoring anaerobic fungal biomass and population size in the rumen.

Authors:  Khin Ohnmar Lwin; Mika Hayakawa; Tomomi Ban-Tokuda; Hiroki Matsui
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 2.  The rumen microbiome: balancing food security and environmental impacts.

Authors:  Itzhak Mizrahi; R John Wallace; Sarah Moraïs
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Effects of methanogenic inhibitors on methane production and abundances of methanogens and cellulolytic bacteria in in vitro ruminal cultures.

Authors:  Zhenming Zhou; Qingxiang Meng; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Examination of the rumen bacteria and methanogenic archaea of wild impalas (Aepyceros melampus melampus) from Pongola, South Africa.

Authors:  Laura M Cersosimo; Hannah Lachance; Benoit St-Pierre; Wouter van Hoven; André-Denis G Wright
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Dissecting the in vivo metabolic potential of two human gut acetogens.

Authors:  Federico E Rey; Jeremiah J Faith; James Bain; Michael J Muehlbauer; Robert D Stevens; Christopher B Newgard; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Effect of phenotypic residual feed intake and dietary forage content on the rumen microbial community of beef cattle.

Authors:  Ciara A Carberry; David A Kenny; Sukkyan Han; Matthew S McCabe; Sinead M Waters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Methanogens: methane producers of the rumen and mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Sarah E Hook; André-Denis G Wright; Brian W McBride
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.273

Review 8.  Toward the identification of methanogenic archaeal groups as targets of methane mitigation in livestock animalsr.

Authors:  Benoit St-Pierre; Laura M Cersosimo; Suzanne L Ishaq; André-Denis G Wright
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Lovastatin production by Aspergillus terreus using agro-biomass as substrate in solid state fermentation.

Authors:  Mohammad Faseleh Jahromi; Juan Boo Liang; Yin Wan Ho; Rosfarizan Mohamad; Yong Meng Goh; Parisa Shokryazdan
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2012-10-14

10.  Immunization against Rumen Methanogenesis by Vaccination with a New Recombinant Protein.

Authors:  Litai Zhang; Xiaofeng Huang; Bai Xue; Quanhui Peng; Zhisheng Wang; Tianhai Yan; Lizhi Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.