Literature DB >> 21351315

The role of the c-statistic in variable selection for propensity score models.

Daniel Westreich1, Stephen R Cole, Michele Jonsson Funk, M Alan Brookhart, Til Stürmer.   

Abstract

The applied literature on propensity scores has often cited the c-statistic as a measure of the ability of the propensity score to control confounding. However, a high c-statistic in the propensity model is neither necessary nor sufficient for control of confounding. Moreover, use of the c-statistic as a guide in constructing propensity scores may result in less overlap in propensity scores between treated and untreated subjects; this may require the analyst to restrict populations for inference. Such restrictions may reduce precision of estimates and change the population to which the estimate applies. Variable selection based on prior subject matter knowledge, empirical observation, and sensitivity analysis is preferable and avoids many of these problems.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21351315      PMCID: PMC3081361          DOI: 10.1002/pds.2074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  27 in total

1.  Data, design, and background knowledge in etiologic inference.

Authors:  J M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Paul Grootendorst; Geoffrey M Anderson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials.

Authors:  Donald B Rubin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Robert W Platt; Enrique F Schisterman; Haitao Chu; Daniel Westreich; David Richardson; Charles Poole
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Timing of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent initiation and adverse outcomes in nondialysis CKD: a propensity-matched observational study.

Authors:  Stephen Seliger; Kathleen M Fox; Shravanthi R Gandra; Brian Bradbury; Van Doren Hsu; Loreen Walker; Chiun-Fang Chiou; Jeffrey C Fink
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Invited commentary: positivity in practice.

Authors:  Daniel Westreich; Stephen R Cole
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Propensity score estimation: neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees (CART), and meta-classifiers as alternatives to logistic regression.

Authors:  Daniel Westreich; Justin Lessler; Michele Jonsson Funk
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning.

Authors:  Brian K Lee; Justin Lessler; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  44 in total

1.  Improving propensity score estimators' robustness to model misspecification using super learner.

Authors:  Romain Pirracchio; Maya L Petersen; Mark van der Laan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Evaluating large-scale propensity score performance through real-world and synthetic data experiments.

Authors:  Yuxi Tian; Martijn J Schuemie; Marc A Suchard
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Consistent causal effect estimation under dual misspecification and implications for confounder selection procedures.

Authors:  Susan Gruber; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Time-dependent propensity score and collider-stratification bias: an example of beta2-agonist use and the risk of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  M Sanni Ali; Rolf H H Groenwold; Wiebe R Pestman; Svetlana V Belitser; Arno W Hoes; A de Boer; Olaf H Klungel
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  The role of prediction modeling in propensity score estimation: an evaluation of logistic regression, bCART, and the covariate-balancing propensity score.

Authors:  Richard Wyss; Alan R Ellis; M Alan Brookhart; Cynthia J Girman; Michele Jonsson Funk; Robert LoCasale; Til Stürmer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Propensity Score: an Alternative Method of Analyzing Treatment Effects.

Authors:  Oliver Kuss; Maria Blettner; Jochen Börgermann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Utilization of nebulized 3% saline in infants hospitalized with bronchiolitis.

Authors:  Todd A Florin; Terri Byczkowski; Richard M Ruddy; Joseph J Zorc; Matthew Test; Samir S Shah
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Single-arm trial of the second version of an acceptance & commitment therapy smartphone application for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Jonathan B Bricker; Wade Copeland; Kristin E Mull; Emily Y Zeng; Noreen L Watson; Katrina J Akioka; Jaimee L Heffner
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Propensity scores for confounder adjustment when assessing the effects of medical interventions using nonexperimental study designs.

Authors:  T Stürmer; R Wyss; R J Glynn; M A Brookhart
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 10.  Propensity score methods to control for confounding in observational cohort studies: a statistical primer and application to endoscopy research.

Authors:  Jeff Y Yang; Michael Webster-Clark; Jennifer L Lund; Robert S Sandler; Evan S Dellon; Til Stürmer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 9.427

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.