BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The severity of anemia at which to initiate erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) treatment in nondialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is unclear. Risk of mortality, hospitalizations, and blood transfusion were compared among nondialysis CKD patients with "early" versus "delayed" ESA initiation. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on CKD (estimated GFR <60 ml/min/1.73m(2)) outpatients in the national Veterans Administration who were initiated on ESAs. Patients with ESRD, gastrointestinal bleeding, chemotherapy, or hematologic malignancy were excluded. Patients were characterized as having early [hemoglobin (Hb) 10.0 to 11.0 g/dl] or delayed (Hb 8.0 to 9.9 g/dl) ESA initiation. A propensity score comprising demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables was used to select a 1:1 matched cohort. Cox survival and negative binomial regression were used to compare the matched groups for all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, and blood transfusions. RESULTS: Of 1837 patients who met inclusion criteria, 1410 (77%) were successfully matched. The groups did not differ significantly in 31 characteristics reflecting sociodemographics, comorbidity, healthcare utilization, and renal function. There was no significant difference in mortality with early initiation. Those initiated early had a 17% lower risk of initial hospitalization and a 29% lower risk of transfusion compared with delayed initiation patients. Results did not differ between those with and without pre-ESA transfusion or hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: In nondialysis CKD, ESA initiation at Hb 10.0 to 11.0 g/dl compared with 8.0 to 9.9 g/dl is associated with reduced risk of blood transfusion and initial hospitalization.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The severity of anemia at which to initiate erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) treatment in nondialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is unclear. Risk of mortality, hospitalizations, and blood transfusion were compared among nondialysis CKD patients with "early" versus "delayed" ESA initiation. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on CKD (estimated GFR <60 ml/min/1.73m(2)) outpatients in the national Veterans Administration who were initiated on ESAs. Patients with ESRD, gastrointestinal bleeding, chemotherapy, or hematologic malignancy were excluded. Patients were characterized as having early [hemoglobin (Hb) 10.0 to 11.0 g/dl] or delayed (Hb 8.0 to 9.9 g/dl) ESA initiation. A propensity score comprising demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables was used to select a 1:1 matched cohort. Cox survival and negative binomial regression were used to compare the matched groups for all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, and blood transfusions. RESULTS: Of 1837 patients who met inclusion criteria, 1410 (77%) were successfully matched. The groups did not differ significantly in 31 characteristics reflecting sociodemographics, comorbidity, healthcare utilization, and renal function. There was no significant difference in mortality with early initiation. Those initiated early had a 17% lower risk of initial hospitalization and a 29% lower risk of transfusion compared with delayed initiation patients. Results did not differ between those with and without pre-ESA transfusion or hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: In nondialysis CKD, ESA initiation at Hb 10.0 to 11.0 g/dl compared with 8.0 to 9.9 g/dl is associated with reduced risk of blood transfusion and initial hospitalization.
Authors: A Levin; C R Thompson; J Ethier; E J Carlisle; S Tobe; D Mendelssohn; E Burgess; K Jindal; B Barrett; J Singer; O Djurdjev Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: A Al-Ahmad; W M Rand; G Manjunath; M A Konstam; D N Salem; A S Levey; M J Sarnak Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Marc A Pfeffer; Emmanuel A Burdmann; Chao-Yin Chen; Mark E Cooper; Dick de Zeeuw; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Jan M Feyzi; Peter Ivanovich; Reshma Kewalramani; Andrew S Levey; Eldrin F Lewis; Janet B McGill; John J V McMurray; Patrick Parfrey; Hans-Henrik Parving; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Ajay K Singh; Scott D Solomon; Robert Toto Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-10-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Claudine T Jurkovitz; Jerome L Abramson; L Viola Vaccarino; William S Weintraub; William M McClellan Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Daniel Westreich; Stephen R Cole; Michele Jonsson Funk; M Alan Brookhart; Til Stürmer Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2010-12-09 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Robert Provenzano; Anatole Besarab; Chao H Sun; Susan A Diamond; John H Durham; Jose L Cangiano; Joseph R Aiello; James E Novak; Tyson Lee; Robert Leong; Brian K Roberts; Khalil G Saikali; Stefan Hemmerich; Lynda A Szczech; Kin-Hung Peony Yu; Thomas B Neff Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Anatole Besarab; Robert Provenzano; Joachim Hertel; Raja Zabaneh; Stephen J Klaus; Tyson Lee; Robert Leong; Stefan Hemmerich; Kin-Hung Peony Yu; Thomas B Neff Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2015-08-03 Impact factor: 5.992