Todd A Florin1, Terri Byczkowski2, Richard M Ruddy2, Joseph J Zorc3, Matthew Test4, Samir S Shah5. 1. Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH. Electronic address: Todd.Florin@cchmc.org. 2. Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH. 3. Division of Emergency Medicine, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA. 5. Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH; Divisions of Hospital Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe utilization of 3% hypertonic saline (HTS) in hospitalized infants and to evaluate the association between HTS use and length of stay (LOS) in a real-world setting. STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included infants≤12 months hospitalized with bronchiolitis between October 2008 and September 2011 using the Pediatric Health Information System. HTS use was categorized as trial, rescue, daily, or sporadic. Differences in LOS were compared after matching daily HTS recipients and nonrecipients on propensity score. RESULTS: There were 63,337 hospitalizations for bronchiolitis. HTS was used in 24 of 42 hospitals and 2.9% of all hospitalizations. HTS use increased from 0.4% of visits in 2008 to 9.2% of visits in 2011. There was substantial variation in HTS use across hospitals (range 0.1%-32.6%). When used, HTS was given daily during 60.6% of hospitalizations, sporadically in 10.4%, as a trial in 11.3%, and as a rescue in 17.7%. The propensity score-matched analysis of daily HTS recipients (n=953) vs nonrecipients (n=953) showed no difference in mean LOS (HTS 2.3 days vs nonrecipients 2.5 days; β-coefficient -0.04; 95% CI -0.15, 0.07; P=.5) or odds of staying longer than 1, 2, or 3 days. Daily HTS recipients had a 33% decreased odds of staying in the hospital>4 days compared with nonrecipients (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.47, 0.97; P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: Variation in HTS use and the lack of association between HTS and mean LOS demonstrates the need for further research to standardize HTS use and better define the infants for whom HTS will be most beneficial.
OBJECTIVES: To describe utilization of 3% hypertonicsaline (HTS) in hospitalized infants and to evaluate the association between HTS use and length of stay (LOS) in a real-world setting. STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included infants≤12 months hospitalized with bronchiolitis between October 2008 and September 2011 using the Pediatric Health Information System. HTS use was categorized as trial, rescue, daily, or sporadic. Differences in LOS were compared after matching daily HTS recipients and nonrecipients on propensity score. RESULTS: There were 63,337 hospitalizations for bronchiolitis. HTS was used in 24 of 42 hospitals and 2.9% of all hospitalizations. HTS use increased from 0.4% of visits in 2008 to 9.2% of visits in 2011. There was substantial variation in HTS use across hospitals (range 0.1%-32.6%). When used, HTS was given daily during 60.6% of hospitalizations, sporadically in 10.4%, as a trial in 11.3%, and as a rescue in 17.7%. The propensity score-matched analysis of daily HTS recipients (n=953) vs nonrecipients (n=953) showed no difference in mean LOS (HTS 2.3 days vs nonrecipients 2.5 days; β-coefficient -0.04; 95% CI -0.15, 0.07; P=.5) or odds of staying longer than 1, 2, or 3 days. Daily HTS recipients had a 33% decreased odds of staying in the hospital>4 days compared with nonrecipients (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.47, 0.97; P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: Variation in HTS use and the lack of association between HTS and mean LOS demonstrates the need for further research to standardize HTS use and better define the infants for whom HTS will be most beneficial.
Authors: W Clayton Bordley; Meera Viswanathan; Valerie J King; Sonya F Sutton; Anne M Jackman; Laura Sterling; Kathleen N Lohr Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2004-02
Authors: Sherry Weitzen; Kate L Lapane; Alicia Y Toledano; Anne L Hume; Vincent Mor Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Shawn L Ralston; Allan S Lieberthal; H Cody Meissner; Brian K Alverson; Jill E Baley; Anne M Gadomski; David W Johnson; Michael J Light; Nizar F Maraqa; Eneida A Mendonca; Kieran J Phelan; Joseph J Zorc; Danette Stanko-Lopp; Mark A Brown; Ian Nathanson; Elizabeth Rosenblum; Stephen Sayles; Sinsi Hernandez-Cancio Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Dimitri A Christakis; Charles A Cowan; Michelle M Garrison; Richard Molteni; Edgar Marcuse; Danielle M Zerr Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Valerie J King; Meera Viswanathan; W Clayton Bordley; Anne M Jackman; Sonya F Sutton; Kathleen N Lohr; Timothy S Carey Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2004-02