Literature DB >> 21351144

WHO absolute fracture risk models (FRAX): do clinical risk factors improve fracture prediction in older women without osteoporosis?

Teresa A Hillier1, Jane A Cauley, Joanne H Rizzo, Kathryn L Pedula, Kristine E Ensrud, Douglas C Bauer, Li-Yung Lui, Kimberly K Vesco, Dennis M Black, Meghan G Donaldson, Erin S Leblanc, Steven R Cummings.   

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) is a strong predictor of fracture, yet most fractures occur in women without osteoporosis by BMD criteria. To improve fracture risk prediction, the World Health Organization recently developed a country-specific fracture risk index of clinical risk factors (FRAX) that estimates 10-year probabilities of hip and major osteoporotic fracture. Within differing baseline BMD categories, we evaluated 6252 women aged 65 or older in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures using FRAX 10-year probabilities of hip and major osteoporotic fracture (ie, hip, clinical spine, wrist, and humerus) compared with incidence of fractures over 10 years of follow-up. Overall ability of FRAX to predict fracture risk based on initial BMD T-score categories (normal, low bone mass, and osteoporosis) was evaluated with receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analyses using area under the curve (AUC). Over 10 years of follow-up, 368 women incurred a hip fracture, and 1011 a major osteoporotic fracture. Women with low bone mass represented the majority (n = 3791, 61%); they developed many hip (n = 176, 48%) and major osteoporotic fractures (n = 569, 56%). Among women with normal and low bone mass, FRAX (including BMD) was an overall better predictor of hip fracture risk (AUC = 0.78 and 0.70, respectively) than major osteoporotic fractures (AUC = 0.64 and 0.62). Simpler models (eg, age + prior fracture) had similar AUCs to FRAX, including among women for whom primary prevention is sought (no prior fracture or osteoporosis by BMD). The FRAX and simpler models predict 10-year risk of incident hip and major osteoporotic fractures in older US women with normal or low bone mass.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21351144      PMCID: PMC3622725          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  25 in total

1.  Clodronate reduces the incidence of fractures in community-dwelling elderly women unselected for osteoporosis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study.

Authors:  Eugene V McCloskey; Monique Beneton; Diane Charlesworth; Karthik Kayan; Dominic deTakats; Abhijit Dey; Jane Orgee; Robert Ashford; Martin Forster; Jennifer Cliffe; Linda Kersh; John Brazier; Jon Nichol; Sakari Aropuu; Tarja Jalava; John A Kanis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Evaluating the value of repeat bone mineral density measurement and prediction of fractures in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Teresa A Hillier; Katie L Stone; Doug C Bauer; Joanne H Rizzo; Kathryn L Pedula; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud; Marc C Hochberg; Steve R Cummings
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-01-22

3.  Effects of estrogen plus progestin on risk of fracture and bone mineral density: the Women's Health Initiative randomized trial.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley; John Robbins; Zhao Chen; Steven R Cummings; Rebecca D Jackson; Andrea Z LaCroix; Meryl LeBoff; Cora E Lewis; Joan McGowan; Joan Neuner; Mary Pettinger; Marcia L Stefanick; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Nelson B Watts
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Should there be a fracas over FRAX and other fracture prediction tools?: Comment on "A comparison of prediction models for fractures in older women".

Authors:  Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Kenneth W Lyles
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

5.  FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures.

Authors:  Ethel S Siris; Ya-Ting Chen; Thomas A Abbott; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Paul D Miller; Lois E Wehren; Marc L Berger
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-24

7.  Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX--assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; E V McCloskey; H Johansson; O Strom; F Borgstrom; A Oden
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  FRAX and risk of vertebral fractures: the fracture intervention trial.

Authors:  Meghan G Donaldson; Lisa Palermo; John T Schousboe; Kristine E Ensrud; Marc C Hochberg; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of treatments to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis.

Authors:  Catherine MacLean; Sydne Newberry; Margaret Maglione; Maureen McMahon; Veena Ranganath; Marika Suttorp; Walter Mojica; Martha Timmer; Alicia Alexander; Melissa McNamara; Sheetal B Desai; Annie Zhou; Susan Chen; Jason Carter; Carlo Tringale; Di Valentine; Breanne Johnsen; Jennifer Grossman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Updated fracture incidence rates for the US version of FRAX.

Authors:  B Ettinger; D M Black; B Dawson-Hughes; A R Pressman; L J Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  25 in total

1.  Correspondence (letter to the editor): Paradigm shift.

Authors:  Peter Schneider
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Predictive value of FRAX for fracture in obese older women.

Authors:  Melissa Premaor; Richard A Parker; Steve Cummings; Kris Ensrud; Jane A Cauley; Li-Yung Lui; Theresa Hillier; Juliet Compston
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  The circulating sphingosine-1-phosphate level predicts incident fracture in postmenopausal women: a 3.5-year follow-up observation study.

Authors:  S J Bae; S H Lee; S H Ahn; H-M Kim; B-J Kim; J-M Koh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Limited clinical utility of a genetic risk score for the prediction of fracture risk in elderly subjects.

Authors:  Joel Eriksson; Daniel S Evans; Carrie M Nielson; Jian Shen; Priya Srikanth; Marc Hochberg; Shannon McWeeney; Peggy M Cawthon; Beth Wilmot; Joseph Zmuda; Greg Tranah; Daniel B Mirel; Sashi Challa; Michael Mooney; Andrew Crenshaw; Magnus Karlsson; Dan Mellström; Liesbeth Vandenput; Eric Orwoll; Claes Ohlsson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  Pitfalls in the external validation of FRAX.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  From fracture risk prediction to evaluating fracture patterns: recent advances in the epidemiology of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nicole C Wright; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 7.  Low-trauma fractures without osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Lespessailles; B Cortet; E Legrand; P Guggenbuhl; C Roux
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine.

Authors:  Nicole C Wright; Anne C Looker; Kenneth G Saag; Jeffrey R Curtis; Elizabeth S Delzell; Susan Randall; Bess Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  The impact of the new National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of osteoporosis in the USA.

Authors:  N C Wright; K G Saag; B Dawson-Hughes; S Khosla; E S Siris
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : A report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Helena Johansson; Anders Odén; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.