Literature DB >> 21345059

Situativity theory: a perspective on how participants and the environment can interact: AMEE Guide no. 52.

Steven J Durning1, Anthony R Artino.   

Abstract

Situativity theory refers to theoretical frameworks which argue that knowledge, thinking, and learning are situated (or located) in experience. The importance of context to these theories is paramount, including the unique contribution of the environment to knowledge, thinking, and learning; indeed, they argue that knowledge, thinking, and learning cannot be separated from (they are dependent upon) context. Situativity theory includes situated cognition, situated learning, ecological psychology, and distributed cognition. In this Guide, we first outline key tenets of situativity theory and then compare situativity theory to information processing theory; we suspect that the reader may be quite familiar with the latter, which has prevailed in medical education research. Contrasting situativity theory with information processing theory also serves to highlight some unique potential contributions of situativity theory to work in medical education. Further, we discuss each of these situativity theories and then relate the theories to the clinical context. Examples and illustrations for each of the theories are used throughout. We will conclude with some potential considerations for future exploration. Some implications of situativity theory include: a new way of approaching knowledge and how experience and the environment impact knowledge, thinking, and learning; recognizing that the situativity framework can be a useful tool to "diagnose" the teaching or clinical event; the notion that increasing individual responsibility and participation in a community (i.e., increasing "belonging") is essential to learning; understanding that the teaching and clinical environment can be complex (i.e., non-linear and multi-level); recognizing that explicit attention to how participants in a group interact with each other (not only with the teacher) and how the associated learning artifacts, such as computers, can meaningfully impact learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21345059     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.550965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  57 in total

1.  Teaching laboratory rodent research techniques under the tenets of situated learning improves student confidence and promotes collaboration.

Authors:  Tiffany L Whitcomb; Edward W Taylor
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Seeing in different ways: introducing "rich pictures" in the study of expert judgment.

Authors:  Sayra Cristancho; Susan Bidinosti; Lorelei Lingard; Richard Novick; Michael Ott; Tom Forbes
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2014-10-03

3.  The Association Between Sensemaking During Physician Team Rounds and Hospitalized Patients' Outcomes.

Authors:  Luci K Leykum; Hannah Chesser; Holly J Lanham; Pezzia Carla; Ray Palmer; Temple Ratcliffe; Heather Reisinger; Michael Agar; Jacqueline Pugh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Simulation on the job: an intensive care unit's report of how in situ simulation has impacted on human factors and ergonomics in the workplace.

Authors:  Sarah Chetcuti; Kaushik Bhowmick
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2019-12-24

5.  eNEUROANAT-CF: a Conceptual Instructional Design Framework for Neuroanatomy e-Learning Tools.

Authors:  Muhammad Asim Javaid; Harriet Schellekens; John F Cryan; André Toulouse
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-01-22

6.  Case-Based Teaching: Does the Addition of High-Fidelity Simulation Make a Difference in Medical Students' Clinical Reasoning Skills?

Authors:  Mary Kathryn Mutter; James R Martindale; Neeral Shah; Maryellen E Gusic; Stephen J Wolf
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-01-10

7.  GENESISS 2-Generating Standards for In-Situ Simulation project: a systematic mapping review.

Authors:  Kerry Evans; Jenny Woodruff; Alison Cowley; Louise Bramley; Giulia Miles; Alastair Ross; Joanne Cooper; Bryn Baxendale
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.263

Review 8.  Knowledge to action: a scoping review of approaches to educate primary care providers in the identification and management of routine sleep disorders.

Authors:  Svetlana King; Raechel Damarell; Lambert Schuwirth; Andrew Vakulin; Ching Li Chai-Coetzer; R Doug McEvoy
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.062

9.  Workplace-based Assessment Data in Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Teresa M Chan; Stefanie S Sebok-Syer; Warren J Cheung; Martin Pusic; Christine Stehman; Michael Gottlieb
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-11-05

10.  The importance of theory and method: A brief reflection on an innovative program of research examining how situational factors influence physicians' clinical reasoning.

Authors:  Alexis Battista; Abigail Konopasky; Steven J Durning
Journal:  FASEB Bioadv       Date:  2021-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.