Literature DB >> 10423021

Prediction of the strength of the elderly proximal femur by bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements of the heel and tibia.

M L Bouxsein1, B S Coan, S C Lee.   

Abstract

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel and tibia have recently been approved in the United States for diagnostic evaluation of low bone mass. The goal of this study was to use human cadaveric specimens to compare correlations among: a) strength of the proximal femur; b) bone mineral density of the femur, tibia, and heel; and c) QUS of the tibia and heel. We obtained 26 proximal femurs and intact lower limbs from 16 female and 10 male cadavers, with a mean age of 81+/-12 years. Bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) of the proximal femur and tibia were assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and BMD (g/cm) of the heel was measured using single-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Ultrasound velocity at the mid-tibia was determined using a contact, gel-coupled ultrasound device. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) of the heel were determined using a transmission ultrasound device with water-based coupling. The femurs were tested to failure in a configuration designed to simulate a fall to the side with impact to the greater trochanter. As in previous studies, the strength of the proximal femur was very strongly correlated with femoral BMD and heel BMD (r2 = 0.78-0.92, p < .0001 for all). BUA and SOS of the heel were also strongly correlated to femoral strength (r2 = 0.70 and 0.67, respectively, p < 0.0001 for both), whereas tibia SOS was only weakly correlated (r2 = 0.19, p = 0.03). The average coefficient of variation for triplicate tibial SOS measurements was 0.50%. This study indicates that, although tibial SOS measurements are precise, they are not strongly correlated with femoral BMD or strength. In contrast, heel QUS measurements are strongly correlated with the strength of the proximal femur. These findings imply that tibial SOS may be of limited use for assessing hip fracture risk. Prospective fracture risk data are needed to define further the clinical utility of tibia ultrasound measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10423021     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00093-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  23 in total

1.  Assessment of the tibia using ultrasonic guided waves in pubertal girls.

Authors:  P Moilanen; P H F Nicholson; T Kärkkäinen; Q Wang; J Timonen; S Cheng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  A poisson process model for hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Zvi Schechner; Gangming Luo; Jonathan J Kaufman; Robert S Siffert
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Use of multiple acoustic wave modes for assessment of long bones: model study.

Authors:  Alexey Tatarinov; Noune Sarvazyan; Armen Sarvazyan
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 4.  Bone geometry and skeletal fragility.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; David Karasik
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Considerations for development of surrogate endpoints for antifracture efficacy of new treatments in osteoporosis: a perspective.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Characterization of the trabecular bone structure using frequency modulated ultrasound pulse.

Authors:  Wei Lin; Yi Xia; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Sideways fall-induced impact force and its effect on hip fracture risk: a review.

Authors:  M Nasiri Sarvi; Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  The factor-of-risk biomechanical approach predicts hip fracture in men and women: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  A B Dufour; B Roberts; K E Broe; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein; M T Hannan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Higher tibial quantitative ultrasound in young female swimmers.

Authors:  B Falk; Z Bronshtein; L Zigel; N Constantini; A Eliakim
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Race and ethnic variation in proximal femur structure and BMD among older men.

Authors:  Lynn M Marshall; Joseph M Zmuda; Benjamin Ks Chan; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud; Thomas F Lang; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.