Literature DB >> 21343326

Phantom flashes caused by interactions across visual space.

Garga Chatterjee1, Daw-An Wu, Bhavin R Sheth.   

Abstract

Studies regarding the effects of context on the perception of a visual target's temporal properties have generally addressed the cross-modal integration of auditory context, within a functional or ecological (e.g., Bayesian) framework. A deeper understanding of contextual effects in temporal vision may be gained by drawing connections with the rich models of signal processing developed in the field of spatial vision. To bridge this gap, we investigate a purely visual version of the cross-modal "double-flash" illusion (L. Shams, Y. Kamitani, & S. Shimojo, 2000; J. T. Wilson & W. Singer, 1981). Here, a single target flash can be perceived as several flashes if it is presented in the context of multiple visual inducers. This effect is robust across conditions where the target and inducers are of opposite contrast polarity, in different hemifields, are non-collinear, are presented dichoptically, or are high-frequency Gabor patches. The effect diminishes when target-inducer distance is increased or when the target is moved toward the fovea. When the target is foveated, the effect can still be recovered if the inducers are placed at 3° distance. Finally, we find that multiple target flashes are not "merged" into a smaller number of perceived flashes when presented with singular inducers. These results suggest a cortical mechanism based on isotropic propagation of transient signals or possibly based on higher level event detection. Finally, we find that multiple target flashes are not "merged" into a smaller number of perceived flashes when presented with singular inducers. These results suggest a mechanism based on the propagation of transient signals and argue against the relevance of the cue integration model developed for the cross-modal version of the effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21343326     DOI: 10.1167/11.2.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  8 in total

1.  Unmasking the dichoptic mask by sound: spatial congruency matters.

Authors:  Yung-Hao Yang; Su-Ling Yeh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Phenomenology of the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Richard V Abadi; Jonathan S Murphy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Nothing is irrelevant in a noisy world: sensory illusions reveal obligatory within-and across-modality integration.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Long-term training reduces the responses to the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Erlei Wang; Ke Lu; Aijun Wang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Daniel P Kumpik; Helen E Roberts; Andrew J King; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The cross-modal double flash illusion depends on featural similarity between cross-modal inducers.

Authors:  Warrick Roseboom; Takahiro Kawabe; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Peripheral Flicker Illusion.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Ito; Tomomi Koizumi
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-12-20

8.  Emotional information affects fission illusion induced by audio-visual interactions.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Takeshima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.