Literature DB >> 21342776

Clinical experience with the ATS 3f Enable® Sutureless Bioprosthesis.

Sven Martens1, Jerzy Sadowski, Friedrich S Eckstein, Krzysztof Bartus, Boguslaw Kapelak, Hans-Hinrich Sievers, Christian Schlensak, Thierry Carrel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The ATS 3f Enable® Bioprosthesis is a self-expanding valve with a tubular design that allows for decreased leaflet stress and preservation of aortic sinuses. We report the midterm results of a prospective, multicenter clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of this stented bioprosthesis in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant procedures.
METHODS: A total of 140 patients (mean age: 76 ± 6 years; 63% of patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) stage III-IV) received the ATS 3f Enable(®) Bioprosthesis in 10 European centers between March 2007 and December 2009. The total accumulated follow-up is 121.8 patient-years.
RESULTS: Valve implantation resulted in significant improvement of patients' symptoms. Mean systolic gradient was 9.04 ± 3.56 and 8.62 ± 3.16 mm Hg with mean effective orifice area of 1.69 ± 0.52 and 1.67 ± 0.44 at 6 months and 1 year, respectively. No significant transvalvular aortic regurgitation was observed. Early complications included three major paravalvular leaks (PVL; 2.1%) resulting in valve explantation and one thrombo-embolic (0.7%) event. All, but one, of the early PVLs were evident intra-operatively with the medical decision made not to reposition or resolve immediately. Late adverse events included three explantations (2.5% per patient-year): one due to PVL and two due to endocarditis. There was an additional case of late endocarditis (0.8% per patient-year) that resolved by medical management. No structural deterioration, valve-related thrombosis or hemolysis was documented.
CONCLUSIONS: The sutureless valve implantation technique is feasible and safe with the ATS 3f Enable Bioprosthesis. Valve implantation resulted in excellent hemodynamics and significant clinical improvement. Overall, these data confirm the safety and clinical utility of the Enable® Bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement.
Copyright © 2011 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21342776     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.12.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  24 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive heart valve surgery: how and why in 2012.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Nassir M Thalji
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Regression of left ventricular mass after implantation of the sutureless 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Giovanni Concistrè; Antonio Miceli; Federica Marchi; Francesca Chiaramonti; Mattia Glauber; Marco Solinas
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2015-04-01

3.  Do we need sutureless or self-anchoring aortic valve prostheses?

Authors:  Malakh Shrestha
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 4.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Yi-Chin Tsai; Nithya Niranjan; Denis Bouchard; Thierry P Carrel; Otto E Dapunt; Harald C Eichstaedt; Theodor Fischlein; Borut Gersak; Mattia Glauber; Axel Haverich; Martin Misfeld; Peter J Oberwalder; Giuseppe Santarpino; Malakh Lal Shrestha; Marco Solinas; Marco Vola; Tristan D Yan; Marco Di Eusanio
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 5.  Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Mattia Glauber; Matteo Ferrarini; Antonio Miceli
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

Review 6.  What are the current results of sutureless valves in high-risk aortic valve disease patients?

Authors:  Amir H Sepehripour; Leanne Harling; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-02-17

Review 7.  Minimally invasive valve surgery.

Authors:  Nicolas H Pope; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 8.  Advances in the management of severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  K E O'Sullivan; S Bargenda; D Sugrue; J Hurley
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Mid-term follow-up after suture-less aortic heart valve implantation.

Authors:  Grzegorz Filip; Radoslaw Litwinowicz; Boguslaw Kapelak; Jacek Piatek; Magdalena Bartus; Janusz Konstanty-Kalandyk; Maciej Brzezinski; Krzysztof Bartus
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Changing trends in aortic valve procedures over the past ten years-from mechanical prosthesis via stented bioprosthesis to TAVI procedures-analysis of 50,846 aortic valve cases based on a Polish National Cardiac Surgery Database.

Authors:  Krzysztof Bartus; Jerzy Sadowski; Radoslaw Litwinowicz; Grzegorz Filip; Marek Jasinski; Marek Deja; Mariusz Kusmierczyk; Szymon Pawlak; Marek Jemielity; Dariusz Jagielak; Piotr Hendzel; Piotr Suwalski; Zdzisław Tobota; Bohdan Maruszewski; Boguslaw Kapelak
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.