Literature DB >> 21338742

Validation of the school lunch recall questionnaire to capture school lunch intake of third- to fifth-grade students.

Amy Paxton1, Suzanne Domel Baxter, Phyllis Fleming, Alice Ammerman.   

Abstract

Children's dietary intake is a key variable in evaluations of school-based interventions. Current methods for assessing children's intake, such as 24-hour recalls and meal observations, are time- and resource-intensive. As part of a study to evaluate the impact of farm-to-school programs, the school lunch recall was developed from a need for a valid and efficient tool to assess school lunch intake among large samples of children. A self-administered paper-and-pencil questionnaire, the school lunch recall prompts for school lunch items by asking children whether they chose a menu item, how much of it they ate, how much they liked it, and whether they would choose it again. The school lunch recall was validated during summer school in 2008 with 18 third- to fifth-grade students (8 to 11 years old) in a North Carolina elementary school. For 4 consecutive days, trained observers recorded foods and amounts students ate during school lunch. Students completed the school lunch recall immediately after lunch. Thirty-seven total observation school lunch recall sets were analyzed. Comparison of school lunch recalls against observations indicated high accuracy, with means of 6% for omission rate (items observed but unreported), 10% for intrusion rate (items unobserved but reported), and 0.63 servings for total inaccuracy (a measure that combines errors for reporting items and amounts). For amounts, accuracy was high for matches (0.06 and 0.01 servings for absolute and arithmetic differences, respectively) but lower for omissions (0.47 servings) and intrusions (0.54 servings). In this pilot study, the school lunch recall was a valid, efficient tool for assessing school lunch intake for a small sample of third- to fifth-grade students.
Copyright © 2011 American Dietetic Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21338742     DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  11 in total

1.  A validation study concerning the effects of interview content, retention interval, and grade on children's recall accuracy for dietary intake and/or physical activity.

Authors:  Suzanne D Baxter; David B Hitchcock; Caroline H Guinn; Kate K Vaadi; Megan P Puryear; Julie A Royer; Kerry L McIver; Marsha Dowda; Russell R Pate; Dawn K Wilson
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.910

Review 2.  A Systematic Review of Methods to Assess Children's Diets in the School Context.

Authors:  Claire N Tugault-Lafleur; Jennifer L Black; Susan I Barr
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Validation of a Brief Questionnaire Against Direct Observation to Assess Adolescents' School Lunchtime Beverage Consumption.

Authors:  Anna H Grummon; Karla E Hampton; Amelie Hecht; Ariana Oliva; Charles E McCulloch; Claire D Brindis; Anisha I Patel
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 3.045

4.  Fourth-grade children's dietary reporting accuracy by meal component: Results from a validation study that manipulated retention interval and prompts.

Authors:  Suzanne D Baxter; David B Hitchcock; Julie A Royer; Albert F Smith; Caroline H Guinn
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-02-05       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Fourth-Grade Children's Reporting Accuracy for Amounts Eaten at School-Provided Meals: Insight from a Reporting-Error-Sensitive Analytic Approach Applied to Validation Study Data.

Authors:  Suzanne D Baxter; David B Hitchcock; Julie A Royer; Albert F Smith; Caroline H Guinn
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 4.910

6.  Effectiveness of Prompts on Fourth-Grade Children's Dietary Recall Accuracy Depends on Retention Interval and Varies by Gender.

Authors:  Suzanne D Baxter; Albert F Smith; David B Hitchcock; Caroline H Guinn; Julie A Royer; Kathleen L Collins; Alyssa L Smith; Megan P Puryear; Kate K Vaadi; Christopher J Finney; Patricia H Miller
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Cardiovascular Health Promotion in Children: Challenges and Opportunities for 2020 and Beyond: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Julia Steinberger; Stephen R Daniels; Nancy Hagberg; Carmen R Isasi; Aaron S Kelly; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Russell R Pate; Charlotte Pratt; Christina M Shay; Jeffrey A Towbin; Elaine Urbina; Linda V Van Horn; Justin P Zachariah
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  A Trial of the Efficacy and Cost of Water Delivery Systems in San Francisco Bay Area Middle Schools, 2013.

Authors:  Anisha I Patel; Anna H Grummon; Karla E Hampton; Ariana Oliva; Charles E McCulloch; Claire D Brindis
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Reporting accuracy of packed lunch consumption among Danish 11-year-olds differ by gender.

Authors:  Nina Lyng; Sisse Fagt; Michael Davidsen; Camilla Hoppe; Bjørn Holstein; Inge Tetens
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Association Between Student Purchases of Beverages During the School Commute and In-School Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, San Francisco Bay Area, 2013.

Authors:  Anna H Grummon; Ariana Oliva; Karla E Hampton; Anisha I Patel
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.