Literature DB >> 21333869

Effect of uncorrected astigmatism on vision.

James S Wolffsohn1, Gurpreet Bhogal, Sunil Shah.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of uncorrected astigmatism in older adults.
SETTING: University vision clinic.
DESIGN: Investigational simulation.
METHODS: Healthy adult presbyopes had astigmatism of 0.00 to -4.00 diopters cylinder (DC) × 90 degrees and -3.00 DC × 90, × 180, and × 45 degrees induced with spectacle lenses, with the mean spherical equivalent compensated to plano, in random order. Visual acuity was assessed binocularly using a computerized test chart at 95%, 50%, and 10% contrast. Near acuity and reading speed were measured using standardized reading texts. Light scatter was quantified with a C-Quant straylight meter and driving reaction times with a computer simulator. Visual clarity of a mobile phone and computer screen was subjectively rated.
RESULTS: Distance visual acuity in the 21 volunteers decreased with increasing uncorrected astigmatic power (F = 174.50, P < .001) and at lower contrasts (F = 170.77, P < .001). Near visual acuity and reading speed also decreased with increasing uncorrected astigmatism power (P < .001). Light scatter was not significantly affected by uncorrected astigmatism (P > .05); however, the reliability and variability of measurements decreased with increasing uncorrected astigmatic power (P < .05). Driving simulator performance was unaffected by uncorrected astigmatism (P > .05), although subjective rating of clarity decreased with increasing uncorrected astigmatic power (P < .001). Uncorrected astigmatism at the 45-degree or 180-degree orientation resulted in worse distance and near visual acuity and subjective-rated clarity than at the 90-degree orientation (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Uncorrected astigmatism, even as low as 1.00 D, caused significantly decreased vision and if left uncorrected could significantly affect patients' independence, quality of life, and well-being.
Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21333869     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  38 in total

1.  Topography and pachymetry maps for mouse corneas using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Alice S Liu; Dillon M Brown; Rachel E Conn; Ryan P McNabb; Machelle T Pardue; Anthony N Kuo
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Optical quality of toric intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery.

Authors:  Xian-Wen Xiao; Jing Hao; Hong Zhang; Fang Tian
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Influence of severity and types of astigmatism on visual acuity in school-aged children in southern China.

Authors:  Li-Li Wang; Wei Wang; Xiao-Tong Han; Ming-Guang He
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) in pre-cataract eyes prior to and after refractive lens exchange.

Authors:  Toam Katz; Johannes Steinberg; Vasyl Druchkiv; Stephan J Linke; Andreas Frings
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis with mitomycin C for myopic astigmatism ≥2.00 diopters using a Zeiss MEL 80 Excimer.

Authors:  A Frings; B Vidic; Y El-Shabrawi; N Ardjomand
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Reading Fluency in School-Aged Children with Bilateral Astigmatism.

Authors:  Erin M Harvey; Joseph M Miller; J Daniel Twelker; Amy L Davis
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Evaluation of Astigmatism-Correcting Efficiency and Rotational Stability after Cataract Surgery with a Double-Loop Haptic Toric Intraocular Lens: A 1-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Ladislav Viktor Nováček; Marie Němcová; Kateřina Tyx; Kristýna Lahodová; Leoš Rejmont; Pavel Rozsíval; Pavel Studený
Journal:  Biomed Hub       Date:  2021-02-17

8.  Clinical differences between toric intraocular lens (IOL) and monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation when myopia is determined as target refraction.

Authors:  Da Young Shin; Ho Sik Hwang; Hyun Seung Kim; Man Soo Kim; Eun Chul Kim
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Perceptual adaptation to the correction of natural astigmatism.

Authors:  Maria Vinas; Lucie Sawides; Pablo de Gracia; Susana Marcos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of the Astigmatic Power of Toric Intraocular Lenses Using Three Toric Calculators.

Authors:  Hyun Ju Park; Hun Lee; Young Jae Woo; Eung Kweon Kim; Kyoung Yul Seo; Ha Yan Kim; Tae-im Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.