Literature DB >> 30140644

Influence of severity and types of astigmatism on visual acuity in school-aged children in southern China.

Li-Li Wang1, Wei Wang1, Xiao-Tong Han1, Ming-Guang He1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the influence of astigmatism on visual acuity in school-aged children, and to define a cutoff for clinically significant astigmatism.
METHODS: This is a population-based, cross-sectional study. Among 5053 enumerated children aged 5-15y in Guangzhou, 3729 (73.8%) children aged 7-15 with successful cycloplegic auto-refraction (1% cyclopentolate) and a reliable visual acuity measurement were included. Ocular measurement included external eye, anterior segment, media and fundus and cycloplegic auto-refraction. Primary outcome measures included the relationship between severity and subtypes of astigmatism and the prevalence of visual impairment. Three criteria for visual impairment were adopted: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤0.7, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) ≤0.5 or <0.7 in the right eye.
RESULTS: Increases of cylinder power was significantly associated with worse visual acuity (UCVA: β=0.051, P<0.01; BCVA: β=0.025, P<0.001). A substantial increase in UCVI and BCVI was seen with astigmatism of 1.00 diopter (D) or more. Astigmatism ≥1.00 D had a greater BCVI prevalence than cylinder power less than 1.00 D (OR=4.20, 95%CI: 3.08-5.74), and this was also true for hyperopic, emmetropic and myopic refraction categories. Oblique astigmatism was associated with a higher risk of BCVI relative to with the rule astigmatism in myopic refractive category (OR=12.87, 95%CI: 2.20-75.38).
CONCLUSION: Both magnitude and subtypes of astigmatism influence the prevalence of visual impairment in school children. Cylinder ≥1.00 D may be useful as a cutoff for clinically significant astigmatism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  astigmatism; children; population-based study; visual acuity

Year:  2018        PMID: 30140644      PMCID: PMC6090130          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2018.08.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  35 in total

1.  Subjective blur limits for cylinder.

Authors:  Huanqing Guo; David A Atchison
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  The effect of monocularly and binocularly induced astigmatic blur on depth discrimination is orientation dependent.

Authors:  Sean I Chen; Mfazo Hove; Carmel L McCloskey; Stephen B Kaye
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Effect of uncorrected astigmatism on vision.

Authors:  James S Wolffsohn; Gurpreet Bhogal; Sunil Shah
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Global cost of correcting vision impairment from uncorrected refractive error.

Authors:  T R Fricke; B A Holden; D A Wilson; G Schlenther; K S Naidoo; S Resnikoff; K D Frick
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Prevalence of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in non-Hispanic white and Asian children: multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study.

Authors:  Ge Wen; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Susan A Cotter; Mark Borchert; Jesse Lin; Jeniffer Kim; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Astigmatism in underserved rural areas: a population based study.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Payam Nabovati; Azam Malekifar; Abbasali Yekta; Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Prevalence of refractive error in Singaporean Chinese children: the strabismus, amblyopia, and refractive error in young Singaporean Children (STARS) study.

Authors:  Mohamed Dirani; Yiong-Huak Chan; Gus Gazzard; Dana Marie Hornbeak; Seo-Wei Leo; Prabakaran Selvaraj; Brendan Zhou; Terri L Young; Paul Mitchell; Rohit Varma; Tien Yin Wong; Seang-Mei Saw
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Risk factors for astigmatism in the Vision in Preschoolers Study.

Authors:  Jiayan Huang; Maureen G Maguire; Elise Ciner; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Lynn A Cyert; Graham E Quinn; Deborah Orel-Bixler; Bruce Moore; Gui-Shuang Ying
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Reading Fluency in School-Aged Children with Bilateral Astigmatism.

Authors:  Erin M Harvey; Joseph M Miller; J Daniel Twelker; Amy L Davis
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 10.  Development and treatment of astigmatism-related amblyopia.

Authors:  Erin M Harvey
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  4 in total

1.  Pentacam Indices in Photorefractive Keratectomy Surgery.

Authors:  Ghazal Maraghechi; Habib Ojaghi; Firouz Amani; Telma Zahirian Moghadam
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec

2.  Self-Reported Computer Vision Syndrome among Thai University Students in Virtual Classrooms during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Prevalence and Associated Factors.

Authors:  Kampanat Wangsan; Phit Upaphong; Pheerasak Assavanopakun; Ratana Sapbamrer; Wachiranun Sirikul; Amornphat Kitro; Naphasorn Sirimaharaj; Sawita Kuanprasert; Maneekarn Saenpo; Suchada Saetiao; Thitichaya Khamphichai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Prevalence of and factors associated with astigmatism in preschool children in Wuxi City, China.

Authors:  Zhihui Yang; Zijing Lu; Yihui Shen; Ting Chu; Xubin Pan; Cun Wang; Jihong Wang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  A comparative study of Pentacam indices in various types and severities of refractive error in candidates for photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery.

Authors:  Ghazal Maraghechi; Habib Ojaghi; Firouz Amani; Amin Najafi
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2022-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.