Literature DB >> 23813344

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis with mitomycin C for myopic astigmatism ≥2.00 diopters using a Zeiss MEL 80 Excimer.

A Frings1, B Vidic, Y El-Shabrawi, N Ardjomand.   

Abstract

To examine the refractive and visual outcome of laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) with mitomycin C(MMC) in eyes with myopic astigmatism ≥2.00 diopters (D). This study comprised 82 eyes of 82 consecutive patients (37 male, 45 female; mean age at surgery 34.7 ± 9.0 years) with preoperative topographic astigmatism ≥2.00 D and mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) -4.50 ± 1.13 D. To assess whether the refractive results differed with the amount of corrected sphere, the data were separated by preoperative SE thereby defining two groups with SE < -5.00 D (-2.00 to -4.75 D) and ≥-5.00 D (-5.00 to -7.75 D). Mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) of -0.39 ± 0.52 D was obtained at the 6-months (5.4 ± 1.6 months) follow-up. The results were within ±1.00 D of the attempted correction in 89 % of patients. The mean postoperative corrected distant visual acuity was -0.02 ± 0.065 logMAR (range -0.10 to 0.15 logMAR). Sixty-seven (81.7 %) of all eyes did not change lines in safety. There was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.262) in safety between the SE groups. Mean efficacy was 0.89 ± 0.27. There was a statistically significant difference in efficacy (P = 0.024) between the preoperative SE groups. Larger ablation zones were associated with better visual outcome, confirmed by safety, efficacy and predictability. The data reported here demonstrated that LASEK using a Zeiss MEL 80 excimer laser with an additional application of MMC is a safe and efficient technique with predictable results for the correction of eyes with myopic astigmatism ≥2.00 D.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23813344     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-013-9819-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  33 in total

Review 1.  LASEK (laser subepithelial keratomileusis).

Authors:  Mohammad H Dastjerdi; H Kaz Soong
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 2.  Wound healing in the cornea: a review of refractive surgery complications and new prospects for therapy.

Authors:  Marcelo V Netto; Rajiv R Mohan; Renato Ambrósio; Audrey E K Hutcheon; James D Zieske; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 3.  Laser eye surgery for refractive errors.

Authors:  Tohru Sakimoto; Mark I Rosenblatt; Dimitri T Azar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-04-29       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Effect of uncorrected astigmatism on vision.

Authors:  James S Wolffsohn; Gurpreet Bhogal; Sunil Shah
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Effects of ablation diameter on long-term refractive stability and corneal transparency after photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  Madhavan S Rajan; David O'Brart; Philip Jaycock; John Marshall
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Risk factors for postoperative cylindrical prediction error after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  R B Vajpayee; D Ghate; N Sharma; R Tandon; J S Titiyal; R M Pandey
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Meta-analysis: clinical outcomes of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy in myopia.

Authors:  Li-Quan Zhao; Rui-Li Wei; Jin-Wei Cheng; You Li; Ji-Ping Cai; Xiao-Ye Ma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Faisal Ghadhfan; Ali Al-Rajhi; Michael D Wagoner
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Analysis of aggregate surgically induced refractive change, prediction error, and intraocular astigmatism.

Authors:  N Alpins
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Wavefront-guided LASIK with the NIDEK NAVEX platform for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism with 6-month follow-up.

Authors:  Jan Venter
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  4 in total

1.  Use of true net power in intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with prior myopic laser refractive surgery.

Authors:  Andreas Frings; Veronika Hold; Gernot Steinwender; Yosuf El-Shabrawi; Navid Ardjomand
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Comparison of clinical outcomes in PRK with a standard and aspherical optimized profile: a full case analysis of 100 eyes with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Dieter Dausch; Burglinde Dausch; Matthias Wottke; Georg Sluyterman van Langeweyde
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-24

3.  A pilot study: LASEK with the Triple-A profile of a MEL 90 for mild and moderate myopia.

Authors:  Yingjun Chen; Dong Yang; Tian Han; Haipeng Xu; Meiyan Li; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Femtosecond laser-assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis to correct myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Juan Gros-Otero; Montserrat Garcia-Gonzalez; Miguel A Teus; MariLuz Iglesias-Iglesias; Carlos Gimenez-Vallejo
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-10-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.