Literature DB >> 26842832

Incidental findings in emergency imaging: frequency, recommendations, and compliance with consensus guidelines.

Tarek N Hanna1, Haris Shekhani2, Matthew E Zygmont2, James Matthew Kerchberger3, Jamlik-Omari Johnson2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of incidental findings (IFs) in emergency department (ED) imaging reports and evaluate the adherence of imaging recommendations to consensus societal guidelines for IFs. A retrospective review of consecutive ED computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) reports from two university-affiliated EDs over a 2-month period was performed. Each imaging report was reviewed in its entirety, and incidental findings were documented along with recommendations for additional imaging. Imaging recommendations were compared to published societal guidelines from the American College of Radiology (ACR) and Fleischner Society. Three thousand one hundred thirty-one total cases consisting of 1967 CTs and 1164 US contained 514 incidental findings (16.4 %), with 329 CT IFs (64 %) and 185 US IFs (36 %). The ovary was the most common organ for an IF (n = 214, 42 %). Of all IFs, 347 (67.5 %) recommendations were concordant with societal guidelines and 167 (32.5 %) were discordant. 39.8 % of CT recommendations were discordant, while 19.5 % of US recommendations were discordant (p < 0.0001). Incidental findings are commonly encountered in the emergent setting. Variable adherence to societal guidelines is noted. Targeted radiologist education and technological solutions may decrease rates of discordance.

Keywords:  American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria; Emergency; Incidental findings; Radiology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26842832     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-016-1378-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  41 in total

1.  The prevalence and implications of incidental findings on ED abdominal CT scans.

Authors:  W A Messersmith; D F Brown; M J Barry
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.469

2.  Trends in utilization rates of the various imaging modalities in emergency departments: nationwide Medicare data from 2000 to 2008.

Authors:  Vijay M Rao; David C Levin; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Frangos; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Quality review: Fleischner criteria adherence by radiologists in a large community hospital.

Authors:  Mark Masciocchi; Brent Wagner; Benjamin Lloyd
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  The American College of Radiology strategy for managing incidental findings on abdominal computed tomography.

Authors:  Lincoln L Berland
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Incidental CT findings in trauma patients: incidence and implications for care of the injured.

Authors:  Thomas R Paluska; Michael J Sise; Daniel I Sack; C Beth Sise; Michael C Egan; Michael Biondi
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2007-01

6.  Assessing the impact of incidental findings in a lung cancer screening study by using low-dose computed tomography.

Authors:  Michael J Kucharczyk; Ravi J Menezes; Alexander McGregor; Narinder S Paul; Heidi C Roberts
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 2.248

7.  Common incidental findings on MDCT: survey of radiologist recommendations for patient management.

Authors:  Pamela T Johnson; Karen M Horton; Alec J Megibow; R Brooke Jeffrey; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  William B Hall; Sherstin G Truitt; Leslie P Scheunemann; Sidharth A Shah; M Patricia Rivera; Leonard A Parker; Shannon S Carson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-23

9.  Significance of cardiac computed tomography incidental findings in acute chest pain.

Authors:  Sam J Lehman; Suhny Abbara; Ricardo C Cury; John T Nagurney; Joe Hsu; Aashish Goela; Christopher L Schlett; Jonathan D Dodd; Thomas J Brady; Fabian Bamberg; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Delayed Growth in Incidental Pancreatic Cysts: Are the Current American College of Radiology Recommendations for Follow-up Appropriate?

Authors:  Olga R Brook; Peter Beddy; Jay Pahade; Corey Couto; Ian Brennan; Payal Patel; Alexander Brook; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Clinically relevant incidental cardiovascular findings in CT examinations].

Authors:  P Voigt; J Fahnert; D Schramm; A G Bach; T Kahn; A Surov
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Whole-body computed tomography: a new point of view in a hospital check-up unit? Our experience in 6516 patients.

Authors:  Maite Millor; Pablo Bartolomé; Maria José Pons; Gorka Bastarrika; Óscar Beloqui; David Cano; Ignacio González; Isabel Vivas
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Detection of unexpected emergency diseases using FDG-PET/CT in oncology patients.

Authors:  Akira Toriihara; Emi Yamaga; Masashi Nakadate; Jun Oyama; Ukihide Tateishi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Incidental findings on whole-body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system.

Authors:  Keisuke Kumada; Nobuo Murakami; Hideshi Okada; Izumi Toyoda; Shinji Ogura; Takahiko Asano
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2019-03-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.