Literature DB >> 25341132

Imaging-based screening: understanding the controversies.

Diana L Lam1, Pari V Pandharipande, Janie M Lee, Constance D Lehman, Christoph I Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goals of this article are to provide an overview of controversial aspects of imaging-based screening and to elucidate potential risks that may offset anticipated benefits.
CONCLUSION: Current controversial topics associated with imaging-based screening include false-positive results, incidental findings, overdiagnosis, radiation risks, and costs. Alongside the benefits of screening, radiologists should be prepared to discuss these additional diagnostic consequences with providers and patients to better guide shared decision making regarding imaging-based screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  false-positive; incidental findings; overdiagnosis; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25341132      PMCID: PMC4220242          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  60 in total

1.  Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy.

Authors:  Richard J Barth; Glen R Gibson; Patricia A Carney; Leila A Mott; Robert D Becher; Steven P Poplack
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer.

Authors:  Donald A Berry; Kathleen A Cronin; Sylvia K Plevritis; Dennis G Fryback; Lauren Clarke; Marvin Zelen; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Andrei Y Yakovlev; J Dik F Habbema; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Occult papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. A "normal" finding in Finland. A systematic autopsy study.

Authors:  H R Harach; K O Franssila; V M Wasenius
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Talya Salz; Sarah E Lillie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Trock; B K Rimer; A Boyce; C Jepson; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.

Authors:  J G Elmore; M B Barton; V M Moceri; S Polk; P J Arena; S W Fletcher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-04-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  Stephen J Swensen; James R Jett; Jeff A Sloan; David E Midthun; Thomas E Hartman; Anne-Marie Sykes; Gregory L Aughenbaugh; Frank E Zink; Shauna L Hillman; Gayle R Noetzel; Randolph S Marks; Amy C Clayton; Peter C Pairolero
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Current thyroid cancer trends in the United States.

Authors:  Louise Davies; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.223

9.  CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia.

Authors:  David H Kim; Perry J Pickhardt; Andrew J Taylor; Winifred K Leung; Thomas C Winter; J Louis Hinshaw; Deepak V Gopal; Mark Reichelderfer; Richard H Hsu; Patrick R Pfau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: concepts and controversies.

Authors:  Evan J Zucker; Anand M Prabhakar
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

Review 2.  The Role of Imaging in Health Screening: Overview, Rationale of Screening, and Screening Economics.

Authors:  David H Ballard; Kirsteen R Burton; Nikita Lakomkin; Shannon Kim; Prabhakar Rajiah; Midhir J Patel; Parisa Mazaheri; Gary J Whitman
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Avoiding fears and promoting shared decision-making: How should physicians inform patients about radiation exposure from imaging tests?

Authors:  Blanca Lumbreras; José Vilar; Isabel González-Álvarez; Mercedes Guilabert; María Pastor-Valero; Lucy Anne Parker; Jorge Vilar-Palop; Ildefonso Hernández-Aguado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  The half-painted picture: Reviewing the mental health impacts of cancer screening.

Authors:  Lauren P Wadsworth; Inga Wessman; Andri Steinþór Björnsson; Gudbjorg Jonsdottir; Sigurður Yngvi Kristinsson
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Visualizing the Invisible: Invisible Waste in Diagnostic Imaging.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann; Eivind Richter Andersen; Elin Kjelle
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.