Literature DB >> 23794077

Risk of medication safety incidents with antibiotic use measured by defined daily doses.

Anas Hamad1, Gillian Cavell, Paul Wade, James Hinton, Cate Whittlesea.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medication incidents (MIs) account for 11.3 % of all reported patient-safety incidents in England and Wales. Approximately one-third of inpatients are prescribed an antibiotic at some point during their hospital stay. The WHO has identified incident reporting as one solution to reduce the recurrence of adverse incidents.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the number and nature of reported antibiotic-associated MIs occurring in inpatients and to use defined daily doses (DDDs) to calculate the incident rate for the antibiotics most commonly associated with MIs at each hospital.
SETTING: Two UK acute NHS teaching hospitals.
METHODS: Retrospective quantitative analysis was performed on antibiotic-associated MIs reported to the risk management system over a 2-year period. Quality-assurance measures were undertaken before analysis. The study was approved by the clinical audit departments at both hospitals. Drug consumption data from each hospital were used to calculate the DDD for each antibiotic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of antibiotic-related MIs reported and the incident rate for the 10 antibiotics most commonly associated with MIs at each hospital.
RESULTS: Healthcare staff submitted 6,756 reports, of which 885 (13.1 %) included antibiotics. This resulted in a total of 959 MIs. Most MIs occurred during prescribing (42.4 %, n = 407) and administration (40.0 %, n = 384) stages. Most common types of MIs were omission/delay (26.3 %, n = 252), and dose/frequency (17.9 %, n = 172). Penicillins (34.5 %, n = 331) and aminoglycosides (16.6 %, n = 159) were the most frequently reported groups with co-amoxiclav (16.8 %, n = 161) and gentamicin (14.1 %, n = 135) the most frequently reported drugs. Using DDDs to assess the incident rate showed that cefotaxime (105.4/10,000 DDDs), gentamicin (25.7/10,000 DDDs) and vancomycin (23.7/10,000 DDDs) had the highest rates.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that detailed analysis of data from reports is essential in understanding MIs and developing strategies to prevent their recurrence. Using DDDs in the analysis of MIs allowed determination of an incident rate providing more useful information than the absolute numbers alone. It also highlighted the disproportionate risk associated with less commonly prescribed antibiotics not identified using MI reporting rates alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23794077     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-013-9805-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  15 in total

1.  Retrospective analysis of medication incidents reported using an on-line reporting system.

Authors:  Darren M Ashcroft; Jonathan Cooke
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2006-11-21

2.  Mapping the limits of safety reporting systems in health care--what lessons can we actually learn?

Authors:  Matthew J W Thomas; Timothy J Schultz; Natalie Hannaford; William B Runciman
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Influence of attitudes on pharmacists' intention to report serious adverse drug events to the Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Paul Gavaza; Carolyn M Brown; Kenneth A Lawson; Karen L Rascati; James P Wilson; Mary Steinhardt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Medication incidents reported to an online incident reporting system.

Authors:  Adel Alrwisan; Jennifer Ross; David Williams
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Hospital staff should use more than one method to detect adverse events and potential adverse events: incident reporting, pharmacist surveillance and local real-time record review may all have a place.

Authors:  Sisse Olsen; Graham Neale; Kat Schwab; Beth Psaila; Tejal Patel; E Jane Chapman; Charles Vincent
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-02

6.  Medication errors in a paediatric teaching hospital in the UK: five years operational experience.

Authors:  L M Ross; J Wallace; J Y Paton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  The incidence and nature of prescribing and medication administration errors in paediatric inpatients.

Authors:  Maisoon Abdullah Ghaleb; Nick Barber; Bryony Dean Franklin; Ian Chi Kei Wong
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Strategies for detecting adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  Terry S Field; Jerry H Gurwitz; Leslie R Harrold; Jeffrey M Rothschild; Kristin Debellis; Andrew C Seger; Leslie S Fish; Lawrence Garber; Michael Kelleher; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 9.  Prevalence, incidence and nature of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Penny J Lewis; Tim Dornan; David Taylor; Mary P Tully; Val Wass; Darren M Ashcroft
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study.

Authors:  Andreas Valentin; Maurizia Capuzzo; Bertrand Guidet; Rui Moreno; Barbara Metnitz; Peter Bauer; Philipp Metnitz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-03-12
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Magnitude of error: a review of wrong dose medication incidents reported to a UK hospital voluntary incident reporting system.

Authors:  Gillian F Cavell; Deepal Mandaliya
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2019-08-21

2.  A pre-postintervention study to evaluate the impact of dose calculators on the accuracy of gentamicin and vancomycin initial doses.

Authors:  Anas Hamad; Gillian Cavell; James Hinton; Paul Wade; Cate Whittlesea
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Antibiotic-associated suspected adverse drug reactions among hospitalized patients in Uganda: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ronald Kiguba; Charles Karamagi; Sheila M Bird
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2017-02-17

4.  Exploring two distinct gentamicin prescribing protocols in UK hospitals: a mixed-methods realist evaluation.

Authors:  Nadine Dyar; Karen Mattick; Rob Bethune
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.