Literature DB >> 27760704

Differences in mental workload between traditional and single-incision laparoscopic procedures measured with a secondary task.

Mark W Scerbo1, Rebecca C Britt2, Dimitrios Stefanidis3.   

Abstract

INTRO: The mental workload associated with laparoscopic suturing can be assessed with a secondary task that requires the same visual-spatial attentional resources. The purpose of this study was to use a secondary task to measure the incremental workload demands of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) procedures versus traditional laparoscopic procedures.
METHOD: 12 surgery residents and surgical assistants who had met FLS criteria on an FLS and SILS simulator performed one trial each of peg transfer, cutting, and intracorporeal suturing tasks simultaneously with the secondary task and provided subjective workload ratings using the NASA-TLX.
RESULTS: SILS procedures resulted in lower primary and secondary task scores, p < 0.001 and higher workload ratings, p < 0.0001. Suturing resulted in lower primary (p < 0.003) and secondary task scores (p < 0.017) and higher workload ratings (p < 0.017) compared to the other tasks.
CONCLUSIONS: SILS procedures were significantly more mentally demanding than traditional laparoscopic procedures corroborated by primary and secondary tasks scores and subjective ratings.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Mental workload; Secondary task; Single incision surgery; Skill

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27760704      PMCID: PMC5303664          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.09.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  17 in total

1.  Redefining simulator proficiency using automaticity theory.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Mark W Scerbo; James R Korndorffer; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Design of a proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  E Matt Ritter; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.058

3.  Maintaining proficiency after fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training: a 1-year analysis of skill retention for surgery residents.

Authors:  Antonio O Castellvi; Lisa A Hollett; Abu Minhajuddin; Deborah C Hogg; Seifu T Tesfay; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) using cross hand technique.

Authors:  Norihiko Ishikawa; Yoshihiko Arano; Satsuki Shimizu; Minoru Morishita; Masahiko Kawaguchi; Aika Matsunoki; Iwao Adachi; Junzo Shimizu; Go Watanabe
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.442

Review 5.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does it work? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marco Maria Lirici; Simone Maria Tierno; Cecilia Ponzano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Higher mental workload is associated with poorer laparoscopic performance as measured by the NASA-TLX tool.

Authors:  Yuliya Y Yurko; Mark W Scerbo; Ajita S Prabhu; Christina E Acker; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.929

Review 7.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S R Markar; A Karthikesalingam; S Thrumurthy; L Muirhead; J Kinross; P Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Simple technique for single incision transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Alan A Saber; Mohamed H Elgamal; Tarek H El-Ghazaly; Aditya V Dewoolkar; Abir Akl
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 6.071

9.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery - current status and controversies.

Authors:  Prashanth P Rao; Pradeep P Rao; Sonali Bhagwat
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.407

10.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.407

View more
  5 in total

1.  Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons' intraoperative cognitive workload.

Authors:  R D Dias; M C Ngo-Howard; M T Boskovski; M A Zenati; S J Yule
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Minimally Invasive Single-Site Cholecystectomy in Obese Patients: Laparoscopic vs. Robotic.

Authors:  Hyeong Seok Kim; Jin-Young Jang
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2019-09-15

3.  Physiological correlates of cognitive load in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Zohreh Zakeri; Ahmet Omurtag; Neil Mansfield; Caroline Sunderland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A Current View on Dual-Task Paradigms and Their Limitations to Capture Cognitive Load.

Authors:  Shirin Esmaeili Bijarsari
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-20

5.  Conventional versus single-incision laparoscopy for the surgical treatment of ovarian torsion.

Authors:  Murat Gozukucuk; Yetkin Karasu; Sena Münire Kaya; Erhan Yangır; Yusuf Üstün
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.