Literature DB >> 26173550

Training improves laparoscopic tasks performance and decreases operator workload.

Jesse S L Hu1, Jirong Lu2, Wee Boon Tan2, Davide Lomanto2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been postulated that increased operator workload during task performance may increase fatigue and surgical errors. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) is a validated tool for self-assessment for workload. Our study aims to assess the relationship of workload and performance of novices in simulated laparoscopic tasks of different complexity levels before and after training.
METHODS: Forty-seven novices without prior laparoscopic experience were recruited in a trial to investigate whether training improves task performance as well as mental workload. The participants were tested on three standard tasks (ring transfer, precision cutting and intracorporeal suturing) in increasing complexity based on the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) curriculum. Following a period of training and rest, participants were tested again. Test scores were computed from time taken and time penalties for precision errors. Test scores and NASA-TLX scores were recorded pre- and post-training and analysed using paired t tests. One-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyse differences in NASA-TLX scores between the three tasks.
RESULTS: NASA-TLX score was lowest with ring transfer and highest with intracorporeal suturing. This was statistically significant in both pre-training (p < 0.001) and post-training (p < 0.001). NASA-TLX scores mirror the changes in test scores for the three tasks. Workload scores decreased significantly after training for all three tasks (ring transfer = 2.93, p < 0.001, precision cutting = 3.74, p < 0.001, intracorporeal suturing = 2.98, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: NASA-TLX score is an accurate reflection of the complexity of simulated laparoscopic tasks in the FLS curriculum. This also correlates with the relationship of test scores between the three tasks. Simulation training improves both performance score and workload score across the tasks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic surgery; Mental workload; Performance assessment; Surgical training

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26173550     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4410-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  9 in total

1.  Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters; Gerald M Fried; Lee L Swanstrom; Nathaniel J Soper; Lelan F Sillin; Bruce Schirmer; Kaaren Hoffman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Workload assessment of surgeons: correlation between NASA TLX and blinks.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Xianta Jiang; Geoffrey Tien; Adam Meneghetti; O Neely M Panton; M Stella Atkins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Increased stress levels may explain the incomplete transfer of simulator-acquired skill to the operating room.

Authors:  Ajita Prabhu; Warren Smith; Yuliya Yurko; Christina Acker; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Surgeons' stress from surgery and night duty: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Koji Yamaguchi; Shuichi Kanemitsu
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-11-15

5.  Assessing mental workload during laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  C Melody Carswell; Duncan Clarke; W Brent Seales
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.058

6.  Differences in gaze behaviour of expert and junior surgeons performing open inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Tony Tien; Philip H Pucher; Mikael H Sodergren; Kumuthan Sriskandarajah; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Higher mental workload is associated with poorer laparoscopic performance as measured by the NASA-TLX tool.

Authors:  Yuliya Y Yurko; Mark W Scerbo; Ajita S Prabhu; Christina E Acker; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.929

8.  Hands-free administration of subjective workload scales: acceptability in a surgical training environment.

Authors:  C Melody Carswell; Cindy H Lio; Russell Grant; Martina I Klein; Duncan Clarke; W Brent Seales; Stephen Strup
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.661

9.  Assessment of workload using NASA Task Load Index in perianesthesia nursing.

Authors:  Gloria Young; Lyubov Zavelina; Vallire Hooper
Journal:  J Perianesth Nurs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.084

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Changes in motor performance and mental workload during practice of reaching movements: a team dynamics perspective.

Authors:  Isabelle M Shuggi; Patricia A Shewokis; Jeffrey W Herrmann; Rodolphe J Gentili
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons' intraoperative cognitive workload.

Authors:  R D Dias; M C Ngo-Howard; M T Boskovski; M A Zenati; S J Yule
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Sensor-based indicators of performance changes between sessions during robotic surgery training.

Authors:  Chuhao Wu; Jackie Cha; Jay Sulek; Chandru P Sundaram; Juan Wachs; Robert W Proctor; Denny Yu
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 4.  Human Mental Workload: A Survey and a Novel Inclusive Definition.

Authors:  Luca Longo; Christoper D Wickens; Gabriella Hancock; Peter A Hancock
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-02

5.  Cognitive load predicts point-of-care ultrasound simulator performance.

Authors:  Sara Aldekhyl; Rodrigo B Cavalcanti; Laura M Naismith
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2018-02

6.  The effect of repeated full immersion simulation training in ureterorenoscopy on mental workload of novice operators.

Authors:  Takashige Abe; Faizan Dar; Passakorn Amnattrakul; Abdullatif Aydin; Nicholas Raison; Nobuo Shinohara; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Kamran Ahmed; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Transfer of training-Virtual reality training with augmented multisensory cues improves user experience during training and task performance in the real world.

Authors:  Natalia Cooper; Ferdinando Millela; Iain Cant; Mark D White; Georg Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  [Robot-assisted surgery as an elective-fascinating lesson(s)?]

Authors:  Philip Zeuschner; Philippe Becker; Julia Heinzelbecker; Johannes Linxweiler; Stefan Siemer; Michael Stöckle; Matthias Saar
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Avatar-based versus conventional vital sign display in a central monitor for monitoring multiple patients: a multicenter computer-based laboratory study.

Authors:  Olivier Garot; Julian Rössler; Juliane Pfarr; Michael T Ganter; Donat R Spahn; Christoph B Nöthiger; David W Tscholl
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Validation of the Raw National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) Questionnaire to Assess Perceived Workload in Patient Monitoring Tasks: Pooled Analysis Study Using Mixed Models.

Authors:  Sadiq Said; Malgorzata Gozdzik; Tadzio Raoul Roche; Julia Braun; Julian Rössler; Alexander Kaserer; Donat R Spahn; Christoph B Nöthiger; David Werner Tscholl
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 5.428

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.