Literature DB >> 21330696

Signal quality measures for pulse oximetry through waveform morphology analysis.

J Abdul Sukor1, S J Redmond, N H Lovell.   

Abstract

Pulse oximetry has been extensively used to estimate oxygen saturation in blood, a vital physiological parameter commonly used when monitoring a subject's health status. However, accurate estimation of this parameter is difficult to achieve when the fundamental signal from which it is derived, the photoplethysmograph (PPG), is contaminated with noise artifact induced by movement of the subject or the measurement apparatus. This study presents a novel method for automatic rejection of artifact contaminated pulse oximetry waveforms, based on waveform morphology analysis. The performance of the proposed algorithm is compared to a manually annotated gold standard. The creation of the gold standard involved two experts identifying sections of the PPG signal containing good quality PPG pulses and/or noise, in 104 fingertip PPG signals, using a simultaneous electrocardiograph (ECG) signal as a reference signal. The fingertip PPG signals were each 1 min in duration and were acquired from 13 healthy subjects (10 males and 3 females). Each signal contained approximately 20 s of purposely induced artifact noise from a variety of activities involving subject movement. Some unique waveform morphology features were extracted from the PPG signals, which were believed to be correlated with signal quality. A simple decision-tree classifier was employed to arrive at a classification decision, at a pulse-by-pulse resolution, of whether a pulse was of acceptable quality for use or not. The performance of the algorithm was assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy measures. A mean κ of 0.64 ± 0.22 was obtained, while the mean sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 89 ± 10%, 77 ± 19% and 83 ± 11%, respectively. Furthermore, a heart rate estimate, extracted from uncontaminated sections of PPG, as identified by the algorithm, was compared with the heart rate derived from an uncontaminated simultaneous ECG signal. The mean error between both heart rate readings was 0.49 ± 0.66 beats per minute (BPM), in comparison to an error value observed without using the artifact detection algorithm of 7.23 ± 5.78 BPM. These results demonstrate that automated identification of signal artifact in the PPG signal through waveform morphology analysis is achievable. In addition, a clear improvement in the accuracy of the derived heart rate is also evident when such methods are employed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21330696     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/32/3/008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  18 in total

1.  Deep learning approaches for plethysmography signal quality assessment in the presence of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Tania Pereira; Cheng Ding; Kais Gadhoumi; Nate Tran; Rene A Colorado; Karl Meisel; Xiao Hu
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 2.833

Review 2.  A review of signals used in sleep analysis.

Authors:  A Roebuck; V Monasterio; E Gederi; M Osipov; J Behar; A Malhotra; T Penzel; G D Clifford
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  Signal quality index: an algorithm for quantitative assessment of functional near infrared spectroscopy signal quality.

Authors:  M Sofía Sappia; Naser Hakimi; Willy N J M Colier; Jörn M Horschig
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  What Does Big Data Mean for Wearable Sensor Systems? Contribution of the IMIA Wearable Sensors in Healthcare WG.

Authors:  S J Redmond; N H Lovell; G Z Yang; A Horsch; P Lukowicz; L Murrugarra; M Marschollek
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

5.  Signal quality estimation with multichannel adaptive filtering in intensive care settings.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Joon Lee; Roger G Mark
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 6.  Detection and Monitoring of Viral Infections via Wearable Devices and Biometric Data.

Authors:  Craig J Goergen; MacKenzie J Tweardy; Steven R Steinhubl; Stephan W Wegerich; Karnika Singh; Rebecca J Mieloszyk; Jessilyn Dunn
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 11.324

7.  Research on recognition and classification of pulse signal features based on EPNCC.

Authors:  Haichu Chen; Chenglong Guo; Zhifeng Wang; Jianxiao Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Time-domain signal averaging to improve microparticles detection and enumeration accuracy in a microfluidic impedance cytometer.

Authors:  Brandon K Ashley; Umer Hassan
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  A Supervised Approach to Robust Photoplethysmography Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Tania Pereira; Kais Gadhoumi; Mitchell Ma; Xiuyun Liu; Ran Xiao; Rene A Colorado; Kevin J Keenan; Karl Meisel; Xiao Hu
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 7.021

10.  Optimized Signal Quality Assessment for Photoplethysmogram Signals Using Feature Selection.

Authors:  Fahimeh Mohagheghian; Dong Han; Andrew Peitzsch; Nishat Nishita; Eric Ding; Emily L Dickson; Danielle DiMezza; Edith M Otabil; Kamran Noorishirazi; Jessica Scott; Darleen Lessard; Ziyue Wang; Cody Whitcomb; Khanh-Van Tran; Timothy P Fitzgibbons; David D McManus; Ki H Chon
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.756

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.