Literature DB >> 31766037

Deep learning approaches for plethysmography signal quality assessment in the presence of atrial fibrillation.

Tania Pereira1, Cheng Ding, Kais Gadhoumi, Nate Tran, Rene A Colorado, Karl Meisel, Xiao Hu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Photoplethysmography (PPG) monitoring has been implemented in many portable and wearable devices we use daily for health and fitness tracking. Its simplicity and cost-effectiveness has enabled a variety of biomedical applications, such as continuous long-term monitoring of heart arrhythmias, fitness, and sleep tracking, and hydration monitoring. One major issue that can hinder PPG-based applications is movement artifacts, which can lead to false interpretations. In many implementations, noisy PPG signals are discarded. Misinterpreted or discarded PPG signals pose a problem in applications where the goal is to increase the yield of detecting physiological events, such as in the case of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF)-a common episodic heart arrhythmia and a leading risk factor for stroke. In this work, we compared a traditional machine learning and deep learning approaches for PPG quality assessment in the presence of AF, in order to find the most robust method for PPG quality assessment. APPROACH: The training data set was composed of 78 278 30 s long PPG recordings from 3764 patients using bedside patient monitors. Two different representations of PPG signals were employed-a time-series based (1D) one and an image-based (2D) one. Trained models were tested on an independent set of 2683 30 s PPG signals from 13 stroke patients. MAIN
RESULTS: ResNet18 showed a higher performance (0.985 accuracy, 0.979 specificity, and 0.988 sensitivity) than SVM and other deep learning approaches. 2D-based models were generally more accurate than 1D-based models. SIGNIFICANCE: 2D representation of PPG signal enhances the accuracy of PPG signal quality assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31766037      PMCID: PMC7198064          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab5b84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  23 in total

1.  Combining billing codes, clinical notes, and medications from electronic health records provides superior phenotyping performance.

Authors:  Wei-Qi Wei; Pedro L Teixeira; Huan Mo; Robert M Cronin; Jeremy L Warner; Joshua C Denny
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages.

Authors:  Q McNEMAR
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1947-06       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Signal quality measures for pulse oximetry through waveform morphology analysis.

Authors:  J Abdul Sukor; S J Redmond; N H Lovell
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Signal-quality indices for the electrocardiogram and photoplethysmogram: derivation and applications to wireless monitoring.

Authors:  Christina Orphanidou; Timothy Bonnici; Peter Charlton; David Clifton; David Vallance; Lionel Tarassenko
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 5.772

5.  2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS.

Authors:  Paulus Kirchhof; Stefano Benussi; Dipak Kotecha; Anders Ahlsson; Dan Atar; Barbara Casadei; Manuel Castella; Hans-Christoph Diener; Hein Heidbuchel; Jeroen Hendriks; Gerhard Hindricks; Antonis S Manolis; Jonas Oldgren; Bogdan Alexandru Popescu; Ulrich Schotten; Bart Van Putte; Panagiotis Vardas
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 6.  Atrial Fibrillation and Mechanisms of Stroke: Time for a New Model.

Authors:  Hooman Kamel; Peter M Okin; Mitchell S V Elkind; Costantino Iadecola
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Monitoring significant ST changes through deep learning.

Authors:  Ran Xiao; Yuan Xu; Michele M Pelter; Richard Fidler; Fabio Badilini; David W Mortara; Xiao Hu
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 1.438

8.  Insights into the problem of alarm fatigue with physiologic monitor devices: a comprehensive observational study of consecutive intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Barbara J Drew; Patricia Harris; Jessica K Zègre-Hemsey; Tina Mammone; Daniel Schindler; Rebeca Salas-Boni; Yong Bai; Adelita Tinoco; Quan Ding; Xiao Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Atrial Fibrillation on Intensive Care Unit Admission Independently Increases the Risk of Weaning Failure in Nonheart Failure Mechanically Ventilated Patients in a Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Yen-Han Tseng; Hsin-Kuo Ko; Yen-Chiang Tseng; Yi-Hsuan Lin; Yu Ru Kou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Photoplethysmography and Deep Learning: Enhancing Hypertension Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Yongbo Liang; Zhencheng Chen; Rabab Ward; Mohamed Elgendi
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-26
View more
  7 in total

1.  Explainability Metrics of Deep Convolutional Networks for Photoplethysmography Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Oliver Zhang; Cheng Ding; Tania Pereira; Ran Xiao; Kais Gadhoumi; Karl Meisel; Randall J Lee; Yiran Chen; Xiao Hu
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  Impact of recording length and other arrhythmias on atrial fibrillation detection from wrist photoplethysmogram using smartwatches.

Authors:  Min-Tsun Liao; Chih-Chieh Yu; Lian-Yu Lin; Ke-Han Pan; Tsung-Hsien Tsai; Yu-Chun Wu; Yen-Bin Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Robust PPG Peak Detection Using Dilated Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Kianoosh Kazemi; Juho Laitala; Iman Azimi; Pasi Liljeberg; Amir M Rahmani
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Impact of Label Noise on the Learning Based Models for a Binary Classification of Physiological Signal.

Authors:  Cheng Ding; Tania Pereira; Ran Xiao; Randall J Lee; Xiao Hu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 5.  How machine learning is impacting research in atrial fibrillation: implications for risk prediction and future management.

Authors:  Ivan Olier; Sandra Ortega-Martorell; Mark Pieroni; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 6.  Machine Learning for Cardiovascular Outcomes From Wearable Data: Systematic Review From a Technology Readiness Level Point of View.

Authors:  Arman Naseri Jahfari; David Tax; Marcel Reinders; Ivo van der Bilt
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-01-19

7.  Machine learning-based data analytic approaches for evaluating post-natal mouse respiratory physiological evolution.

Authors:  Wesley Wang; Diego Alzate-Correa; Michele Joana Alves; Mikayla Jones; Alfredo J Garcia; Jing Zhao; Catherine Miriam Czeisler; José Javier Otero
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 1.931

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.