Literature DB >> 21329699

Computational protein design and large-scale assessment by I-TASSER structure assembly simulations.

Andrea Bazzoli1, Andrea G B Tettamanzi, Yang Zhang.   

Abstract

Protein design aims at designing new protein molecules of desired structure and functionality. One of the major obstacles to large-scale protein design are the extensive time and manpower requirements for experimental validation of designed sequences. Recent advances in protein structure prediction have provided potentials for an automated assessment of the designed sequences via folding simulations. We present a new protocol for protein design and validation. The sequence space is initially searched by Monte Carlo sampling guided by a public atomic potential, with candidate sequences selected by the clustering of sequence decoys. The designed sequences are then assessed by I-TASSER folding simulations, which generate full-length atomic structural models by the iterative assembly of threading fragments. The protocol is tested on 52 nonhomologous single-domain proteins, with an average sequence identity of 24% between the designed sequences and the native sequences. Despite this low sequence identity, three-dimensional models predicted for the first designed sequence have an RMSD of <2 Å to the target structure in 62% of cases. This percentage increases to 77% if we consider the three-dimensional models from the top 10 designed sequences. Such a striking consistency between the target structure and the structural prediction from nonhomologous sequences, despite the fact that the design and folding algorithms adopt completely different force fields, indicates that the design algorithm captures the features essential to the global fold of the target. On average, the designed sequences have a free energy that is 0.39 kcal/(mol residue) lower than in the native sequences, potentially affording a greater stability to synthesized target folds.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21329699      PMCID: PMC3070181          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  42 in total

1.  Rosetta in CASP4: progress in ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  R Bonneau; J Tsai; I Ruczinski; D Chivian; C Rohl; C E Strauss; D Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001

2.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations.

Authors:  Raphael Guerois; Jens Erik Nielsen; Luis Serrano
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-07-05       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  TASSER: an automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Adrian K Arakaki; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005

5.  High-resolution structural validation of the computational redesign of human U1A protein.

Authors:  Neil Dobson; Gautam Dantas; David Baker; Gabriele Varani
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Automated server predictions in CASP7.

Authors:  James N D Battey; Jürgen Kopp; Lorenza Bordoli; Randy J Read; Neil D Clarke; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007

7.  De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection.

Authors:  B I Dahiyat; S L Mayo
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein.

Authors:  J Kyte; R F Doolittle
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Emergence of protein fold families through rational design.

Authors:  Feng Ding; Nikolay V Dokholyan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  18 in total

1.  Further evidence for the likely completeness of the library of solved single domain protein structures.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Hongyi Zhou; Michal Brylinski
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Changing the Apoptosis Pathway through Evolutionary Protein Design.

Authors:  David Shultis; Pralay Mitra; Xiaoqiang Huang; Jarrett Johnson; Naureen Aslam Khattak; Felicia Gray; Clint Piper; Jeff Czajka; Logan Hansen; Bingbing Wan; Krishnapriya Chinnaswamy; Liu Liu; Mi Wang; Jingxi Pan; Jeanne Stuckey; Tomasz Cierpicki; Christoph H Borchers; Shaomeng Wang; Ming Lei; Yang Zhang
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Enhanced purification of histidine-tagged carboxymethylcellulase produced by Escherichia coli BL21/LBH-10 and comparison of its characteristics with carboxymethylcellulase without histidine-tag.

Authors:  Duk-Un Kang; Yong-Suk Lee; Jin-Woo Lee
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  FASPR: an open-source tool for fast and accurate protein side-chain packing.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Huang; Robin Pearce; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  EvoEF2: accurate and fast energy function for computational protein design.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Huang; Robin Pearce; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Why not consider a spherical protein? Implications of backbone hydrogen bonding for protein structure and function.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Mu Gao; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.676

7.  Crystal structure of designed PX domain from cytokine-independent survival kinase and implications on evolution-based protein engineering.

Authors:  David Shultis; Gregory Dodge; Yang Zhang
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.867

Review 8.  Energy functions in de novo protein design: current challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  Zhixiu Li; Yuedong Yang; Jian Zhan; Liang Dai; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 12.981

Review 9.  Structure, function and evolution of the animal mitochondrial replicative DNA helicase.

Authors:  Laurie S Kaguni; Marcos T Oliveira
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2015-11-29       Impact factor: 8.250

10.  Physics-based protein structure refinement through multiple molecular dynamics trajectories and structure averaging.

Authors:  Vahid Mirjalili; Keenan Noyes; Michael Feig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-08-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.