Literature DB >> 21327365

Indecision on decisional separability.

Michael L Mack1, Jennifer J Richler, Isabel Gauthier, Thomas J Palmeri.   

Abstract

The theoretical framework of General Recognition Theory (GRT; Ashby & Townsend, Psychological Review, 93, 154-179, 1986) coupled with the empirical analysis tools of Multidimensional Signal Detection Analysis (MSDA; Kadlec & Townsend, Multidimensional models of perception and recognition, pp. 181-228, 1992) have become one important method for assessing dimensional interactions in perceptual decision-making. In this article, we critically examine MSDA and characterize cases where it is unable to discriminate two kinds of dimensional interactions: perceptual separability and decisional separability. We performed simulations with known instances of violations of perceptual or decisional separability, applied MSDA to the data generated by these simulations, and evaluated MSDA on its ability to accurately characterize the perceptual versus decisional source of these simulated dimensional interactions. Critical cases of violations of perceptual separability are often mischaracterized by MSDA as violations of decisional separability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21327365     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-010-0017-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  Perceptual interactions of facial dimensions in speeded classification and identification.

Authors:  R D Thomas
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-05

2.  On the relation between decision rules and perceptual representation in multidimensional perceptual categorization.

Authors:  W T Maddox; S V Bogdanov
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-07

3.  Preserving informational separability and violating decisional separability in facial perception and recognition.

Authors:  Michael J Wenger; Erin M Ingvalson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Assessing sensitivity in a multidimensional space: some problems and a definition of a general d'.

Authors:  R D Thomas
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

5.  Holistic processing of faces: perceptual and decisional components.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier; Michael J Wenger; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces.

Authors:  Olivia S Cheung; Jennifer J Richler; Thomas J Palmeri; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Sensory and perceptual interactions in weight perception.

Authors:  André B Valdez; Eric L Amazeen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-05

8.  Invariance of perceptual spaces and perceptual separability of stimulus dimensions.

Authors:  H Kadlec; C L Hicks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Configurational information in face perception.

Authors:  A W Young; D Hellawell; D C Hay
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Varieties of perceptual independence.

Authors:  F G Ashby; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Decisional separability, model identification, and statistical inference in the general recognition theory framework.

Authors:  Noah H Silbert; Robin D Thomas
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

2.  Object-location binding across a saccade: A retinotopic spatial congruency bias.

Authors:  Anna Shafer-Skelton; Colin N Kupitz; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  General recognition theory with individual differences: a new method for examining perceptual and decisional interactions with an application to face perception.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Lauren Vucovich; Robert Musgrave; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

4.  The perception of a face can be greater than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  Jianhong Shen; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

5.  When a face type is perceived as threatening: Using general recognition theory to understand biased categorization of Afrocentric faces.

Authors:  Heather M Kleider-Offutt; Alesha D Bond; Sarah E Williams; Corey J Bohil
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

6.  Becoming a Lunari or Taiyo expert: learned attention to parts drives holistic processing of faces.

Authors:  Kao-Wei Chua; Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Feature-location binding in 3D: Feature judgments are biased by 2D location but not position-in-depth.

Authors:  Nonie J Finlayson; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  When Intuition Fails to Align with Data: A Reply to.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013-05-10

9.  Testing Separability and Independence of Perceptual Dimensions with General Recognition Theory: A Tutorial and New R Package (grtools).

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Emily Zheng; Johnny Fonseca; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-23

10.  Meanings, mechanisms, and measures of holistic processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Thomas J Palmeri; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.