Literature DB >> 12199209

Assessing sensitivity in a multidimensional space: some problems and a definition of a general d'.

R D Thomas1.   

Abstract

This article provides a formal definition for a sensivity measure, d'g between two multivariate stimuli. In recent attempts to assess perceptual representations using qualitative tests on response probabilities, the concept of a d' between two multidimensional stimuli has played a central role. For example, Kadlec and Townsend (1992a, 1992b) proposed several tests based on multidimensional signal detection theory that allow conclusions concerning the perceptual and/or decisional interactions of stimulus dimensions. One proposition, referred to as the diagonal d' test, relies on specific stimulus subsets of a feature-complete factorial identification task to infer perceptual separability. Also, Ashby and Townsend (1986), in a similar manner, attempted to relate perceptual independence to dimensional orthogonality in Tanner's (1956) model, which also involves d' between two multivariate signals. An analysis of the proposed d'g reveals shortcomings in the diagonal d' test and also demonstrates that the assumptions behind equating perceptual independence to dimensional orthogonality are too weak. This d'g can be related to a common measure of statistical distance, Mahalanobis distance, in the special case of equal covariance matrices.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 12199209     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  Feature integration that routinely occurs without focal attention.

Authors:  M Kubovy; D J Cohen; J Hollier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

2.  Similarity, identification, and categorization: comment on Ashby and Lee (1991)

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; J E Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1992-06

3.  Predicting similarity and categorization from identification.

Authors:  F G Ashby; W W Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1991-06

4.  Perceptual separability, decisional separability, and the identification-speeded classification relationship.

Authors:  W T Maddox; F G Ashby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Integrality in the perception of tongue root position and voice quality in vowels.

Authors:  J Kingston; N A Macmillan; L W Dickey; R Thorburn; C Bartels
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Visual detection and perceptual independence: assessing color and form.

Authors:  D J Cohen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-05

7.  Varieties of perceptual independence.

Authors:  F G Ashby; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization.

Authors:  W T Maddox; F G Ashby
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-01

9.  Investigations of exemplar and decision bound models in large, ill-defined category structures.

Authors:  S C McKinley; R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Integrality of nasalization and F1 in vowels in isolation and before oral and nasal consonants: a detection-theoretic application of the Garner paradigm.

Authors:  J Kingston; N A Macmillan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Using magnitude estimation to investigate the perceptual components of signal detection theory.

Authors:  D J Cohen; L Lecci
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Diagonal d' does not (always) diagnose failure of separability: An addendum to.

Authors:  Noah H Silbert; Kenneth J de Jong; Robin D Thomas; James T Townsend
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2009-07-01

3.  Indecision on decisional separability.

Authors:  Michael L Mack; Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

Review 4.  Decisional separability, model identification, and statistical inference in the general recognition theory framework.

Authors:  Noah H Silbert; Robin D Thomas
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

5.  Linking signal detection theory and encoding models to reveal independent neural representations from neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Lauren E Vucovich; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Separating the contributions of primary and unwanted cues in psychophysical studies.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Mathematical Psychology: Prospects For The 21 Century: A Guest Editorial.

Authors:  James T Townsend
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.223

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.