Literature DB >> 8470627

Are endoscopic measurements of colonic polyps reliable?

M B Fennerty1, J Davidson, S S Emerson, R E Sampliner, L J Hixson, H S Garewal.   

Abstract

Many clinical studies of colorectal adenomatous polyps rely on endoscopic estimation of polyp size. To examine the reliability of such measurements, we conducted a study using artificial polyps in an endoscopy teaching model. Eight experienced endoscopists estimated the size of 13 polyps in two separate sessions 2 wk apart. Endoscopic estimates of polyp size tended to be significantly lower than the true polyp size for all polyps and all endoscopists at both sessions. We also found a statistically significant difference in the magnitude of the underestimation between the first and second session (p < 0.0001). At the first session, polyps tended to be estimated at 64% of their true size, and at the second session, the estimates tended to be at 77% of the actual polyp size. We estimate the magnitude of the variation in polyp measurements due to individual polyps, endoscopist, and examination session, and discuss the impact these sources of variation have in planning of clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8470627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  25 in total

1.  An evidence-based microsimulation model for colorectal cancer: validation and application.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; James E Savarino
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  Polyp size measurement at CT colonography: what do we know and what do we need to know?

Authors:  Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Measurement of colonic polyps by radiologists and endoscopists: who is most accurate?

Authors:  S Punwani; S Halligan; P Irving; S Bloom; A Bungay; R Greenhalgh; J Godbold; S A Taylor; D G Altman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Endoscopic imaging and size estimation of colorectal adenomas in the multiple intestinal neoplasia mouse.

Authors:  Harvey H Hensley; Carrie E Merkel; Wen-Chi L Chang; Karthik Devarajan; Harry S Cooper; Margie L Clapper
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Characterization of the pathologic and endoscopic measurements of colorectal polyp sizes with a focus on sessile serrated adenoma and high-grade dysplasia.

Authors:  Fan Li; Zheng Chen; Yu Yang; Xianghua Yi; Yunsheng Yang; Lanjing Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-03-15

6.  Endoscopic estimation of tumor size in early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jeongmin Choi; Sang Gyun Kim; Jong Pil Im; Joo Sung Kim; Hyun Chae Jung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Prevalence of colon polyps detected by colonoscopy screening in asymptomatic black and white patients.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Jennifer L Holub; Matthew D Moravec; Glenn M Eisen; Dawn Peters; Cynthia D Morris
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Does a computer-aided detection algorithm in a second read paradigm enhance the performance of experienced computed tomography colonography readers in a population of increased risk?

Authors:  Ayso H de Vries; Sebastiaan Jensch; Marjolein H Liedenbaum; Jasper Florie; Chung Y Nio; Roel Truyen; Shandra Bipat; Evelien Dekker; Paul Fockens; Lubbertus C Baak; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Polyp measurement based on CT colonography and colonoscopy: variability and systematic differences.

Authors:  Ayso H de Vries; Shandra Bipat; Evelien Dekker; Marjolein H Liedenbaum; Jasper Florie; Paul Fockens; Roel van der Kraan; Elizabeth M Mathus-Vliegen; Johannes B Reitsma; Roel Truyen; Frans M Vos; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Primary uncleansed 2D versus primary electronically cleansed 3D in limited bowel preparation CT-colonography. Is there a difference for novices and experienced readers?

Authors:  Ayso H de Vries; Marjolein H Liedenbaum; Shandra Bipat; Roel Truyen; Iwo W O Serlie; Rutger H Cohen; Saskia G C van Elderen; Anneke Heutinck; Oskar Kesselring; Wouter de Monyé; Lambertus te Strake; Tjeerd Wiersma; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.