Literature DB >> 19806024

DNA damage foci in mitosis are devoid of 53BP1.

Glyn Nelson1, Matthias Buhmann, Thomas von Zglinicki.   

Abstract

Nuclear DNA damage foci indicate ongoing DNA damage response, which is the major inducer of cell cycle arrest, cellular senescence and apoptosis. 53BP1 is one central mediator of the DNA damage response and a component of active DNA damage foci. Using an AcGFP-53BP1c fluorescent fusion protein that quantitatively reports DNA damage, we show that the recruitment of 53BP1 into gammaH2A.X-containing DNA damage foci was inhibited at G(2)/M. This suggests a possible mechanism for cells to continue through the G(2) checkpoint with gammaH2A.X-flagged double strand breaks via inhibition of 53BP1-mediated DNA damage signalling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19806024     DOI: 10.4161/cc.8.20.9857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  51 in total

1.  γH2AX foci on apparently intact mitotic chromosomes: not signatures of misrejoining events but signals of unresolved DNA damage.

Authors:  Marta Martín; Mariona Terradas; Laia Hernández; Anna Genescà
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 2.  The control of DNA repair by the cell cycle.

Authors:  Nicole Hustedt; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  Let it go: how to deal with a breakup in mitosis.

Authors:  Eros Lazzerini Denchi; Julia Li
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  Plk1-mediated stabilization of 53BP1 through USP7 regulates centrosome positioning to maintain bipolarity.

Authors:  H Yim; S-B Shin; S U Woo; P C-W Lee; R L Erikson
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 5.  53BP1: pro choice in DNA repair.

Authors:  Michal Zimmermann; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 20.808

6.  microRNA-34a promotes DNA damage and mitotic catastrophe.

Authors:  Alexander V Kofman; Jungeun Kim; So Yeon Park; Evan Dupart; Christopher Letson; Yongde Bao; Kai Ding; Quan Chen; David Schiff; James Larner; Roger Abounader
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Image-based quantitative determination of DNA damage signal reveals a threshold for G2 checkpoint activation in response to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Aya Ishikawa; Motohiro Yamauchi; Keiji Suzuki; Shunichi Yamashita
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2010-08-04

8.  DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis.

Authors:  Simona Giunta; Rimma Belotserkovskaya; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Pseudo-DNA damage response in senescent cells.

Authors:  Tatyana V Pospelova; Zoya N Demidenko; Elena I Bukreeva; Valery A Pospelov; Andrei V Gudkov; Mikhail V Blagosklonny
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Feedback between p21 and reactive oxygen production is necessary for cell senescence.

Authors:  João F Passos; Glyn Nelson; Chunfang Wang; Torsten Richter; Cedric Simillion; Carole J Proctor; Satomi Miwa; Sharon Olijslagers; Jennifer Hallinan; Anil Wipat; Gabriele Saretzki; Karl Lenhard Rudolph; Tom B L Kirkwood; Thomas von Zglinicki
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 11.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.