Literature DB >> 21317255

Temperature adaptation markedly determines evolution within the genus Saccharomyces.

Z Salvadó1, F N Arroyo-López, J M Guillamón, G Salazar, A Querol, E Barrio.   

Abstract

The present study uses a mathematical-empirical approach to estimate the cardinal growth temperature parameters (T(min), the temperature below which growth is no longer observed; T(opt), the temperature at which the μ(max) equals its optimal value; μ(opt), the optimal value of μ(max); and T(max), the temperature above which no growth occurs) of 27 yeast strains belonging to different Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces species. S. cerevisiae was the yeast best adapted to grow at high temperatures within the Saccharomyces genus, with the highest optimum (32.3°C) and maximum (45.4°C) growth temperatures. On the other hand, S. kudriavzevii and S. bayanus var. uvarum showed the lowest optimum (23.6 and 26.2°C) and maximum (36.8 and 38.4°C) growth temperatures, respectively, confirming that both species are more psychrophilic than S. cerevisiae. The remaining Saccharomyces species (S. paradoxus, S. mikatae, S. arboricolus, and S. cariocanus) showed intermediate responses. With respect to the minimum temperature which supported growth, this parameter ranged from 1.3 (S. cariocanus) to 4.3°C (S. kudriavzevii). We also tested whether these physiological traits were correlated with the phylogeny, which was accomplished by means of a statistical orthogram method. The analysis suggested that the most important shift in the adaptation to grow at higher temperatures occurred in the Saccharomyces genus after the divergence of the S. arboricolus, S. mikatae, S. cariocanus, S. paradoxus, and S. cerevisiae lineages from the S. kudriavzevii and S. bayanus var. uvarum lineages. Finally, our mathematical models suggest that temperature may also play an important role in the imposition of S. cerevisiae versus non-Saccharomyces species during wine fermentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21317255      PMCID: PMC3067424          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01861-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  20 in total

1.  Modeling of the bacterial growth curve.

Authors:  M H Zwietering; I Jongenburger; F M Rombouts; K van 't Riet
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Assessing phylogenetic dependence of morphological traits using co-inertia prior to investigate character evolution in Loricariinae catfishes.

Authors:  Raphaël Covain; Stéphane Dray; Sonia Fisch-Muller; Juan I Montoya-Burgos
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2007-12-25       Impact factor: 4.286

3.  The combined effects of temperature, pH and NaCl on growth of Debaryomyces hansenii analyzed by flow cytometry and predictive microbiology.

Authors:  B B Sørensen; M Jakobsen
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1997-03-03       Impact factor: 5.277

4.  Influence of temperature and pH on Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum growth; impact of a wine yeast interspecific hybridization on these parameters.

Authors:  Audrey Serra; Pierre Strehaiano; Patricia Taillandier
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 5.277

5.  Saccharomyces paradoxus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are associated with exudates of North American oaks.

Authors:  G I Naumov; E S Naumova; P D Sniegowski
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  The effect of sodium chloride and temperature on the rate and extent of growth of Clostridium botulinum type A in pasteurized pork slurry.

Authors:  A M Gibson; N Bratchell; T A Roberts
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1987-06

7.  Sympatric natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. paradoxus populations have different thermal growth profiles.

Authors:  Joseph Y Sweeney; Heidi A Kuehne; Paul D Sniegowski
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Saccharomyces arboricolus sp. nov., a yeast species from tree bark.

Authors:  Shi-An Wang; Feng-Yan Bai
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.747

9.  Development and validation of a tertiary simulation model for predicting the potential growth of Salmonella typhimurium on cooked chicken.

Authors:  Thomas P Oscar
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 5.277

10.  Quantifying the complexities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae's ecosystem engineering via fermentation.

Authors:  Matthew R Goddard
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.499

View more
  66 in total

1.  Electron transport chain in a thermotolerant yeast.

Authors:  Jorge A Mejía-Barajas; José A Martínez-Mora; Rafael Salgado-Garciglia; Ruth Noriega-Cisneros; Omar Ortiz-Avila; Christian Cortés-Rojo; Alfredo Saavedra-Molina
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 2.  The biology of habitat dominance; can microbes behave as weeds?

Authors:  Jonathan A Cray; Andrew N W Bell; Prashanth Bhaganna; Allen Y Mswaka; David J Timson; John E Hallsworth
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.813

3.  Local climatic adaptation in a widespread microorganism.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Leducq; Guillaume Charron; Pedram Samani; Alexandre K Dubé; Kayla Sylvester; Brielle James; Pedro Almeida; José Paulo Sampaio; Chris Todd Hittinger; Graham Bell; Christian R Landry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Cellular Control of Viscosity Counters Changes in Temperature and Energy Availability.

Authors:  Laura B Persson; Vardhaan S Ambati; Onn Brandman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Co-encapsulation of amyloglucosidase with starch and Saccharomyces cerevisiae as basis for a long-lasting CO2 release.

Authors:  Pascal Humbert; Marina Vemmer; Marco Giampà; Hanna Bednarz; Karsten Niehaus; Anant V Patel
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Prion-based memory of heat stress in yeast.

Authors:  Tatiana A Chernova; Yury O Chernoff; Keith D Wilkinson
Journal:  Prion       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.931

7.  Lipid Composition Analysis Reveals Mechanisms of Ethanol Tolerance in the Model Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M Lairón-Peris; S J Routledge; J A Linney; J Alonso-Del-Real; C M Spickett; A R Pitt; J M Guillamón; E Barrio; A D Goddard; A Querol
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Physiological and transcriptional responses of anaerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae subjected to diurnal temperature cycles.

Authors:  Marit Hebly; Dick de Ridder; Erik A F de Hulster; Pilar de la Torre Cortes; Jack T Pronk; Pascale Daran-Lapujade
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Mating of natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for improved glucose fermentation and lignocellulosic inhibitor tolerance.

Authors:  Trudy Jansen; Justin Wallace Hoff; Neil Jolly; Willem Heber van Zyl
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.099

10.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae KNU5377 stress response during high-temperature ethanol fermentation.

Authors:  Il-Sup Kim; Young-Saeng Kim; Hyun Kim; Ingnyol Jin; Ho-Sung Yoon
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 5.034

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.