Literature DB >> 14734033

Sympatric natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. paradoxus populations have different thermal growth profiles.

Joseph Y Sweeney1, Heidi A Kuehne, Paul D Sniegowski.   

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its close congener S. paradoxus are typically indistinguishable by the phenotypic criteria of classical yeast taxonomy, but they are evolutionarily distinct as indicated by hybrid spore inviability and genomic sequence divergence. Previous work has shown that these two species coexist in oak-associated microhabitats at natural woodland sites in North America. Here, we show that sympatric populations of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus from a single natural site are phenotypically differentiated in their growth rate responses to temperature. Our main finding is that the S. cerevisiae population exhibits a markedly higher growth rate at 37 degrees C than the S. paradoxus population; we also find possible differences in growth rate between these populations at two lower temperatures. We discuss the implications of our results for the coexistence of these yeasts in natural environments, and we suggest that thermal growth response may be an evolutionarily labile feature of these organisms that could be analyzed using genomic approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14734033     DOI: 10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00171-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res        ISSN: 1567-1356            Impact factor:   2.796


  18 in total

1.  Social wasps promote social behavior in Saccharomyces spp.

Authors:  Meredith Blackwell; Cletus P Kurtzman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Local climatic adaptation in a widespread microorganism.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Leducq; Guillaume Charron; Pedram Samani; Alexandre K Dubé; Kayla Sylvester; Brielle James; Pedro Almeida; José Paulo Sampaio; Chris Todd Hittinger; Graham Bell; Christian R Landry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Social wasps are a Saccharomyces mating nest.

Authors:  Irene Stefanini; Leonardo Dapporto; Luisa Berná; Mario Polsinelli; Stefano Turillazzi; Duccio Cavalieri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Temperature adaptation markedly determines evolution within the genus Saccharomyces.

Authors:  Z Salvadó; F N Arroyo-López; J M Guillamón; G Salazar; A Querol; E Barrio
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Natural populations of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in Portugal are associated with oak bark and are sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus.

Authors:  José Paulo Sampaio; Paula Gonçalves
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Revisiting Mortimer's Genome Renewal Hypothesis: heterozygosity, homothallism, and the potential for adaptation in yeast.

Authors:  Paul M Magwene
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Evidence for divergent evolution of growth temperature preference in sympatric Saccharomyces species.

Authors:  Paula Gonçalves; Elisabete Valério; Cláudia Correia; João M G C F de Almeida; José Paulo Sampaio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a nomadic yeast with no niche?

Authors:  Matthew R Goddard; Duncan Greig
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Forest Saccharomyces paradoxus are robust to seasonal biotic and abiotic changes.

Authors:  Primrose J Boynton; Dominika Wloch-Salamon; Doreen Landermann; Eva H Stukenbrock
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Prezygotic reproductive isolation between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus.

Authors:  Calum J Maclean; Duncan Greig
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.